Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MITT vs WELL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MITT
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.+6.9%
WELL
Welltower Inc.

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$151.66B
5Y Perf.+327.2%

MITT vs WELL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MITT logoMITT
WELL logoWELL
IndustryREIT - MortgageREIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$250M$151.66B
Revenue (TTM)$493M$11.63B
Net Income (TTM)$34M$1.43B
Gross Margin94.2%39.1%
Operating Margin93.3%4.4%
Forward P/E7.2x79.7x
Total Debt$8.10B$21.38B
Cash & Equiv.$76M$5.03B

MITT vs WELLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MITT
WELL
StockMay 20May 26Return
TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT)100106.9+6.9%
Welltower Inc. (WELL)100427.2+327.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MITT vs WELL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WELL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MITT
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc
The Real Estate Income Play

MITT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (7.2x vs 79.7x)
  • 10.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%
Best for: value and dividends
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
  • Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • 233.9% 10Y total return vs MITT's -15.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWELL logoWELL35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs MITT's 14.4%
ValueMITT logoMITTLower P/E (7.2x vs 79.7x)
Quality / MarginsWELL logoWELL12.3% margin vs MITT's 6.8%
Stability / SafetyWELL logoWELLBeta 0.13 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage
DividendsMITT logoMITT10.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%
Momentum (1Y)WELL logoWELL+45.8% vs MITT's +36.1%
Efficiency (ROA)WELL logoWELL2.3% ROA vs MITT's 0.4%, ROIC 0.5% vs 4.5%

MITT vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MITTTPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc
FY 2018
Single Family Rental Properties Segment
100.0%$4M
Corporate Segment
0.0%$0
Securities And Loans Segment
0.0%$0
WELLWelltower Inc.
FY 2025
Senior Housing - Operating
81.1%$8.5B
Triple Net
11.4%$1.2B
Outpatient Medical
7.5%$782M

MITT vs WELL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWELLLAGGINGMITT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 23.6x MITT's $493M. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MITT's 6.8%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$493M$11.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$457M$2.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$34M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$68M$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.2%+39.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+93.3%+4.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.8%+12.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.8%+21.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.9%+40.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.3%+22.5%
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MITT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.8x trailing earnings, MITT trades at a 94% valuation discount to WELL's 155.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MITT's 18.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 67.4x.

MetricMITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
Market CapShares × price$250M$151.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.3B$168.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.77x155.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.25x79.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.25x67.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.53x14.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.44x3.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.20x53.25x
MITT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MITT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MITT delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs MITT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.1%+3.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.4%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.5%+0.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.5%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage14.45x0.49x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8.0B$16.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$76M$5.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8.1B$21.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.12x0.26x
MITT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,193 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,459 for MITT. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +45.8% total return vs MITT's +36.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 43.3% vs MITT's 23.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-5.0%+16.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+36.1%+45.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.8%+194.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-5.4%+211.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.9%+233.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+23.6%+43.3%
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MITT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs MITT's 85.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.13x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.27$219.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.33$142.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.1%+98.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.557.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded280K2.6M
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MITT and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates MITT as "Buy" and WELL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for MITT (target: $10) vs 4.6% for WELL (target: $227). For income investors, MITT offers the higher dividend yield at 9.98% vs WELL's 1.28%.

MetricMITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.63$226.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1834
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+10.0%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.79$2.76
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — MITT and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WELL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MITT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallWelltower Inc. (WELL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MITT vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MITT or WELL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MITT or WELL?

On trailing P/E, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) is the cheapest at 8.

8x versus Welltower Inc. at 155. 7x. On forward P/E, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MITT or WELL?

Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) delivered a total return of +211. 9%, compared to -5. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +233. 9% versus MITT's -15. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MITT or WELL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc's 0. 90β — meaning MITT is approximately 577% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MITT or WELL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 14. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Welltower Inc. grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MITT or WELL?

TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

3% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITT leads at 96. 9% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MITT leads at 94. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MITT or WELL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) trades at 7.

2x forward P/E versus 79. 7x for Welltower Inc. — 72. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MITT: 22. 1% to $9. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MITT or WELL?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) offers the highest yield at 10. 0%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).

09

Is MITT or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +233. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +233. 9%, MITT: -15. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MITT and WELL?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MITT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WELL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MITT and WELL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MITT: 20.9% · WELL: 40.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(MITT: 6.8% · WELL: 12.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MITT: 8.8x · WELL: 155.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.