Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MKC vs THS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.14B
5Y Perf.-45.3%
THS
TreeHouse Foods, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.46B
5Y Perf.-53.3%

MKC vs THS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MKC logoMKC
THS logoTHS
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$12.14B$1.46B
Revenue (TTM)$6.84B$3.34B
Net Income (TTM)$789M$-242M
Gross Margin37.9%17.7%
Operating Margin15.7%-4.6%
Forward P/E15.5x12.8x
Total Debt$4.00B$1.57B
Cash & Equiv.$96M$290M

MKC vs THSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MKC
THS
StockMay 20May 26Return
McCormick & Company… (MKC)10054.7-45.3%
TreeHouse Foods, In… (THS)10046.7-53.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MKC vs THS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MKC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
The Growth Play

MKC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 1.7%, EPS growth 0.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
  • 26.9% 10Y total return vs THS's -73.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta -0.03, Low D/E 69.3%, current ratio 0.70x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
THS
TreeHouse Foods, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

THS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.18, current ratio 1.36x
  • Lower P/E (12.8x vs 15.5x)
  • +13.8% vs MKC's -33.6%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMKC logoMKC1.7% revenue growth vs THS's -2.3%
ValueTHS logoTHSLower P/E (12.8x vs 15.5x)
Quality / MarginsMKC logoMKC11.5% margin vs THS's -7.2%
Stability / SafetyMKC logoMKCLower D/E ratio (69.3% vs 101.3%)
DividendsMKC logoMKC3.7% yield; 27-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)THS logoTHS+13.8% vs MKC's -33.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MKC logoMKC6.0% ROA vs THS's -6.4%, ROIC 8.5% vs 2.7%

MKC vs THS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MKCMcCormick & Company, Incorporated
FY 2025
Consumer
57.8%$4.0B
Flavor Solutions
42.2%$2.9B
THSTreeHouse Foods, Inc.
FY 2024
Snacking
100.0%$1.3B

MKC vs THS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMKCLAGGINGTHS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MKC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKC is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 2.1x THS's $3.3B. MKC is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to THS's -7.2%.

MetricMKC logoMKCMcCormick & Compa…THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.8B$3.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.3B$11M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$789M-$242M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$879M$101M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.9%+17.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.7%-4.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.5%-7.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.8%+3.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.9%+0.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.0%-74.1%
MKC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

THS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.3x trailing earnings, MKC trades at a 66% valuation discount to THS's 47.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, THS's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MKC's 12.1x.

MetricMKC logoMKCMcCormick & Compa…THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …
Market CapShares × price$12.1B$1.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16.0B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.35x47.90x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.46x12.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate15.47x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.12x10.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.78x0.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.24x0.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.40x11.59x
THS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MKC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MKC delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-19 for THS. MKC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to THS's 1.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKC scores 6/9 vs THS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMKC logoMKCMcCormick & Compa…THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.7%-19.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.0%-6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.5%+2.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.7%+3.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.69x1.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.9B$1.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$96M$290M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.0B$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.65x-1.98x
MKC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MKC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MKC five years ago would be worth $6,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,022 for THS. Over the past 12 months, THS leads with a +13.8% total return vs MKC's -33.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKC at -15.6% vs THS's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMKC logoMKCMcCormick & Compa…THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-28.1%+4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-33.6%+13.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.8%-54.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.2%-49.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+26.9%-73.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-15.6%-23.1%
MKC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MKC and THS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MKC is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THS's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THS currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs MKC's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMKC logoMKCMcCormick & Compa…THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.03x1.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$78.16$24.85
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$47.31$15.85
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.3%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.857.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.0M28.9M
Evenly matched — MKC and THS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates MKC as "Hold" and THS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.8% upside for MKC (target: $73) vs -5.9% for THS (target: $23). MKC is the only dividend payer here at 3.74% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMKC logoMKCMcCormick & Compa…THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$73.20$23.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3026
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises27
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.79
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+10.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MKC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). THS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMcCormick & Company, Incorp… (MKC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MKC vs THS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MKC or THS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the stronger pick with 1.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) a "Hold" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MKC or THS?

On trailing P/E, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the cheapest at 16.

3x versus TreeHouse Foods, Inc. at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MKC or THS?

Over the past 5 years, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) delivered a total return of -37.

2%, compared to -49. 8% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MKC returned +26. 9% versus THS's -73. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MKC or THS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

03β versus TreeHouse Foods, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning THS is approximately -4316% more volatile than MKC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 101% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MKC or THS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is pulling ahead at 1.

7% versus -2. 3% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McCormick & Company, Incorporated grew EPS 0. 3% year-over-year, compared to -45. 7% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, THS leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MKC or THS?

McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

5% net margin versus 0. 8% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKC leads at 16. 0% versus 3. 1% for THS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKC leads at 37. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MKC or THS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TreeHouse Foods, Inc.

(THS) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for McCormick & Company, Incorporated — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKC: 52. 8% to $73. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MKC or THS?

In this comparison, MKC (3.

7% yield) pays a dividend. THS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MKC or THS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

03), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKC: +26. 9%, THS: -73. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MKC and THS?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MKC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; THS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MKC pays a dividend while THS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MKC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

THS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MKC and THS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MKC: 2.9% · THS: 0.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MKC: 16.3x · THS: 47.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.