Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG vs ICHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG vs ICHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $20.25B | $13.63B | $22.48B | $2.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.07B | $1.03B | $3.24B | $959M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $327M | $106M | $265M | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 48.8% | 43.2% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.8% | 10.0% | 29.1% | -3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 30.4x | 38.7x | 41.4x | 62.2x |
| Total Debt | $4.69B | $17M | $3.89B | $186M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $675M | $346M | $360M | $98M |
MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG vs ICHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 881.7 | +781.7% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 313.1 | +213.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG vs ICHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 62.2x)
ONTO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 5.79x
- 10.3% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
- 4.7% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC 5.7% vs -3.9%
ENTG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ICHR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and momentum.
- 11.6% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
- +329.1% vs ENTG's +88.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.6% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 62.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.64 vs ICHR's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +329.1% vs ENTG's +88.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC 5.7% vs -3.9% |
MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG vs ICHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG vs ICHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICHR leads 1 • MKSI leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 4.2x ICHR's $959M. ONTO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $1.0B | $3.2B | $959M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $945M | $158M | $1.3B | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $327M | $106M | $265M | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $401M | $239M | $721M | -$17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +48.8% | +43.2% | +11.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +10.0% | +29.1% | -3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +10.3% | +8.2% | -5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +23.2% | +22.3% | -1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | +9.5% | +5.0% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.2% | -48.5% | +46.3% | +46.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ICHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 30% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENTG's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONTO's 68.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.2B | $13.6B | $22.5B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.3B | $13.3B | $26.0B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 68.83x | 98.57x | 95.26x | -46.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.36x | 38.74x | 41.38x | 62.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.70x | 68.79x | 19.81x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.15x | 13.56x | 7.03x | 2.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.49x | 6.43x | 5.68x | 3.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.74x | 45.47x | 56.74x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ICHR. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ICHR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +5.2% | +6.7% | -7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +4.7% | +3.1% | -5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +5.7% | +9.3% | -3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +6.5% | +11.7% | -4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.73x | 0.01x | 0.98x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.0B | -$329M | $3.5B | $87M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $675M | $346M | $360M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.7B | $17M | $3.9B | $186M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.84x | — | 2.47x | -5.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MKSI and ONTO and ICHR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,895 for ICHR. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs ENTG's +88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs ENTG's 23.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +78.8% | +65.2% | +65.1% | +249.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +306.1% | +118.9% | +88.9% | +329.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +266.0% | +218.0% | +87.4% | +151.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | +312.6% | +30.4% | +28.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +750.6% | +1431.7% | +1040.3% | +629.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.1% | +47.1% | +23.3% | +35.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKSI and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKSI is the less volatile stock with a 2.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs ONTO's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 2.66x | 2.66x | 3.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $326.83 | $315.86 | $159.15 | $72.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $71.49 | $85.88 | $66.32 | $13.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.0% | +86.8% | +92.8% | +97.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 61.0 | 63.8 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 832K | 2.4M | 795K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKSI as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -30.1% for ICHR (target: $50). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $272.86 | $308.33 | $152.00 | $49.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 11 | 26 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.87 | — | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICHR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG vs ICHR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
(ICHR) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MKS Inc. (MKSI) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR?
On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to +28. 9% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1432% versus ICHR's +629. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 64β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 49% more volatile than MKSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
(ICHR) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MKSI leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 31. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ONTO, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MKSI or ONTO or ENTG or ICHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) carries a higher beta of 3. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, ICHR: +629. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKSI and ONTO and ENTG and ICHR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.