Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs IHRT vs IAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Travel Services
Broadcasting
Internet Content & Information
MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs IHRT vs IAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services | Travel Services | Broadcasting | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $44M | $14.83B | $4.52B | $880M | $3.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $321M | $3.41B | $1.04B | $3.86B | $2.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $25M | $57M | $-473M | $41M |
| Gross Margin | 86.2% | 77.4% | 73.4% | 78.5% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | -0.8% | 14.1% | -0.5% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 25.8x | 73.2x | — | 109.7x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.14B | $237M | $5.79B | $1.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $1.73B | $509M | $271K | $960M |
MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs IHRT vs IAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 328.8 | +228.8% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs IHRT vs IAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 11.8%
- Beta 0.37, yield 11.8%, current ratio 0.56x
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 109.7x)
- Beta 0.37 vs IHRT's 1.82
CSGP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
MMYT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -54.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.7%
- 190.1% 10Y total return vs IAC's 347.8%
- 25.0% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- 5.5% margin vs IHRT's -12.2%
IHRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +415.5% vs MMYT's -54.9%
Among these 5 stocks, IAC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 109.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs IHRT's -12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs IHRT's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 11.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IHRT's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs MMYT's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs IHRT's -12.0%, ROIC 9.2% vs -0.4% |
MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs IHRT vs IAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs IHRT vs IAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MMYT leads in 3 of 6 categories
MKTW leads 2 • CSGP leads 0 • IHRT leads 0 • IAC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IHRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 12.0x MKTW's $321M. MMYT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IHRT's -12.2%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $321M | $3.4B | $1.0B | $3.9B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $278M | $175M | $339M | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $25M | $57M | -$473M | $41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $241M | $224M | $11M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +86.2% | +77.4% | +73.4% | +78.5% | +64.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | -0.8% | +14.1% | -0.5% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +0.7% | +5.5% | -12.2% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +7.1% | +21.5% | +0.3% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.5% | +22.5% | +10.6% | +0.8% | -25.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -156.1% | +127.7% | -68.3% | -20.8% | +64.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MKTW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, MKTW trades at a 100% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IAC's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 83.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $14.8B | $4.5B | $880M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$20M | $14.2B | $4.3B | $6.7B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.20x | 2107.23x | 60.86x | -1.86x | -32.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.84x | 73.17x | — | 109.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.31x | 83.74x | 28.92x | 19.65x | 14.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 4.57x | 4.62x | 0.23x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.77x | 4.79x | — | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.96x | 361.59x | 26.07x | 80.64x | 71.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $0 for CSGP. CSGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IAC's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMYT scores 6/9 vs IHRT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +0.3% | +8.2% | — | +0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +0.2% | +3.1% | -12.0% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.9% | +9.2% | -0.4% | -1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -0.8% | +9.2% | -0.5% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.14x | 0.20x | — | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$64M | -$589M | -$272M | $5.8B | $466M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $1.7B | $509M | $270,900 | $960M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.1B | $237M | $5.8B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.58x | 1.67x | -0.17x | 4.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,170 for MKTW. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs MMYT's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMYT at 25.5% vs CSGP's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | -46.7% | -38.3% | +36.6% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.6% | -53.6% | -54.9% | +415.5% | +22.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | -52.9% | +97.5% | +85.9% | -2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.3% | -58.9% | +97.0% | -75.0% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.2% | +77.5% | +190.1% | -68.5% | +347.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.1% | -22.2% | +25.5% | +23.0% | -1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKTW and IAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHRT's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 0.80x | 1.17x | 1.82x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.74 | $97.43 | $113.85 | $6.56 | $45.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.37 | $33.31 | $32.84 | $1.08 | $29.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +35.9% | +44.4% | +86.4% | +94.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 30.4 | 59.4 | 68.6 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 5.9M | 1.5M | 986K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
MKTW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKTW as "Hold", CSGP as "Buy", MMYT as "Buy", IHRT as "Buy", IAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs -79.0% for MKTW (target: $4). For income investors, MKTW offers the higher dividend yield at 11.79% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $61.91 | $91.00 | $3.50 | $49.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 25 | 11 | 10 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.8% | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.96 | — | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.7% | +3.9% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +9.8% |
MMYT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MKTW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MKTW vs CSGP vs MMYT vs IHRT vs IAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC?
On trailing P/E, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, CoStar Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.
0%, compared to -88. 3% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus MKTW's -88. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning IHRT is approximately 390% more volatile than MKTW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 30% for IAC InterActive Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.
0% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC?
MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
7% net margin versus -12. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKTW leads at 19. 2% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTW leads at 85. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) trades at 25. 8x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 83. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC?
In this comparison, MKTW (11.
8% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CSGP, MMYT, IAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MKTW or CSGP or MMYT or IHRT or IAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 11. 8% yield). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTW: -88. 2%, IHRT: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKTW and CSGP and MMYT and IHRT and IAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (MKTW (Technology) and CSGP (Real Estate) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical) and IHRT (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MKTW is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MKTW pays a dividend while CSGP, MMYT, IHRT, IAC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.