MLCI
Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock
Asset Management
Market Cap$46M
5Y Perf.-2.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MLCI vs PFLT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
Asset Management
Market Cap$888M
5Y Perf.-6.8%
MLCI vs PFLT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MLCI | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $46M | $888M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-12M | $172M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-61M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 480.5% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $94M | $1.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $123M |
Quick Verdict: MLCI vs PFLT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PFLT leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MLCI
Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock
The Banking Pick
MLCI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, current ratio 36.76x
- 489.9% margin vs PFLT's 38.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
The Banking Pick
PFLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.5%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -48.6%
- 72.6% 10Y total return vs MLCI's -11.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PFLT | 2.2% NII/revenue growth vs MLCI's -106.3% |
| Value | PFLT | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 15.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | MLCI | 489.9% margin vs PFLT's 38.7% |
| Stability / Safety | PFLT | Beta 0.79 vs MLCI's 1.20 |
| Dividends | PFLT | 13.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MLCI's 4.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PFLT | +1.5% vs MLCI's -11.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PFLT | 4.3% ROA vs MLCI's -3.6%, ROIC 2.1% vs -40.0% |
MLCI vs PFLT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
MLCI vs PFLT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPFLTLAGGINGMLCI
MLCIMount Logan Capital I…
2leads
PFLTPennantPark Floating …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MLCIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MLCI4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MLCI2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PFLT5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PFLT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
PFLT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
PFLT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLCI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFLT and MLCI operate at a comparable scale, with $172M and -$12M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.9% (MLCI) to 38.7% (PFLT).
| Metric | MLCIMount Logan Capit… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$12M | $172M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$89M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$61M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | $242M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +178.6% | +55.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.0% | +40.9% |
MLCI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MLCI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MLCIMount Logan Capit… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $888M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $124M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.57x | 12.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.07x | 7.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 37.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.34x |
MLCI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFLT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFLT delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-77 for MLCI. MLCI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFLT's 1.65x.
| Metric | MLCIMount Logan Capit… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -76.8% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.0% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.9% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.03x | 1.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $79M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $123M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.87x | 0.35x |
PFLT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFLT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFLT five years ago would be worth $11,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,806 for MLCI. Over the past 12 months, PFLT leads with a +1.5% total return vs MLCI's -11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFLT at 5.7% vs MLCI's -4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MLCIMount Logan Capit… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.1% | -0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.9% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.9% | +18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.9% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.9% | +72.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.2% | +5.7% |
PFLT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLCI's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFLT currently trades 82.3% from its 52-week high vs MLCI's 46.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MLCIMount Logan Capit… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.74 | $10.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.31 | $7.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.6% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 68.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 987K |
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, PFLT offers the higher dividend yield at 13.47% vs MLCI's 4.63%.
| Metric | MLCIMount Logan Capit… | PFLTPennantPark Float… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.19 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | 0.0% |
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PFLT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MLCI leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallPennantPark Floating Rate C… (PFLT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MLCI vs PFLT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLCI or PFLT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -106. 3% for Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock (MLCI). PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLCI or PFLT?
On forward P/E, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 7. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLCI or PFLT?
Over the past 5 years, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) delivered a total return of +17. 2%, compared to -11. 9% for Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock (MLCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFLT returned +72. 6% versus MLCI's -11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLCI or PFLT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock's 1. 20β — meaning MLCI is approximately 52% more volatile than PFLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock (MLCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 165% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLCI or PFLT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -106. 3% for Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock (MLCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. grew EPS -48. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLCI or PFLT?
Mount Logan Capital Inc.
Common Stock (MLCI) is the more profitable company, earning 489. 9% net margin versus 38. 7% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — meaning it keeps 489. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLCI leads at 717. 0% versus 39. 4% for PFLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MLCI leads at 480. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLCI or PFLT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 1x for Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLCI or PFLT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) offers the highest yield at 13. 5%, versus 4. 6% for Mount Logan Capital Inc. Common Stock (MLCI).
09Is MLCI or PFLT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 13. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFLT: +72. 6%, MLCI: -11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLCI and PFLT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MLCI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PFLT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MLCI: -106.3% · PFLT: 2.2%)Net Margin>
%
(MLCI: 489.9% · PFLT: 38.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.