Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MLGO vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV vs IAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Advertising Agencies
MLGO vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV vs IAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $45M | $483M | $2.01B | $1.76B | $1.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $440M | $723M | $764M | $591M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-8M | $159M | $55M | $47M |
| Gross Margin | 26.8% | 33.3% | 63.4% | 82.2% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | -3.4% | 14.8% | 11.5% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 8.9x | 13.4x | 20.5x | 27.5x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $42M | $279M | $100M | $58M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $91M | $553M | $259M | $84M |
MLGO vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV vs IAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) | 100 | 50.3 | -49.7% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| Integral Ad Science… (IAS) | 100 | 50.0 | -50.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLGO vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV vs IAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 27.5x)
PERI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 139.6% 10Y total return vs MGNI's -4.7%
MGNI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 22.0% margin vs PERI's -1.8%
- 5.3% ROA vs PERI's -0.9%, ROIC 9.5% vs -1.7%
DV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.3%
- 13.9% revenue growth vs MLGO's -19.1%
IAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.83
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 5.7%, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.83, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.83 vs MLGO's 2.29
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% revenue growth vs MLGO's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 27.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs PERI's -1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs MLGO's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.1% vs MLGO's -94.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs PERI's -0.9%, ROIC 9.5% vs -1.7% |
MLGO vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV vs IAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MLGO vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV vs IAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MLGO leads in 1 of 6 categories
MGNI leads 1 • PERI leads 1 • IAS leads 1 • DV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MGNI and DV and IAS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DV is the larger business by revenue, generating $764M annually — 12.5x MLGO's $61M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PERI's -1.8%. On growth, IAS holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $440M | $723M | $764M | $591M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $3M | $145M | $148M | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$8M | $159M | $55M | $47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $39M | $44M | $135M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +33.3% | +63.4% | +82.2% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | -3.4% | +14.8% | +11.5% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | -1.8% | +22.0% | +7.2% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +8.9% | +6.1% | +17.7% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.3% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +9.6% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +72.7% | +142.9% | +3.0% | -57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MLGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.9x trailing earnings, MLGO trades at a 96% valuation discount to IAS's 45.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 106.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $483M | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$126M | $434M | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.94x | -56.74x | 14.74x | 36.17x | 44.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.89x | 13.45x | 20.52x | 27.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.99x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -133.59x | 106.04x | 11.43x | 11.77x | 13.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 1.10x | 2.81x | 2.35x | 3.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.09x | 0.67x | 2.33x | 1.60x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.13x | 12.66x | 12.11x | 10.18x | 22.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PERI. MLGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLGO scores 6/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | -1.2% | +18.6% | +5.0% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | -0.9% | +5.3% | +4.2% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | -1.7% | +9.5% | +6.4% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | -1.8% | +7.3% | +6.6% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.06x | 0.30x | 0.09x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | -$49M | -$275M | -$159M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $91M | $553M | $259M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $42M | $279M | $100M | $58M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | — | 4.03x | 43.16x | 93.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PERI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PERI five years ago would be worth $6,282 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for MLGO. Over the past 12 months, IAS leads with a +40.1% total return vs MLGO's -94.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs MLGO's -92.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.7% | +15.3% | -12.8% | -0.1% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.4% | +16.9% | +12.6% | -19.9% | +40.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -68.0% | +58.7% | -60.1% | -39.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -37.2% | -60.9% | -70.2% | -49.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +139.6% | -4.7% | -68.9% | -49.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.8% | -31.6% | +16.7% | -26.4% | -15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
IAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLGO's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAS currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs MLGO's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.29x | 0.94x | 1.63x | 1.03x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $117.00 | $11.79 | $26.65 | $16.82 | $10.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.02 | $8.07 | $10.82 | $7.64 | $7.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +91.4% | +52.5% | +64.5% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 59.1 | 55.4 | 61.2 | 67.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 137K | 321K | 2.1M | 2.6M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PERI as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", DV as "Buy", IAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for DV (target: $15) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | $18.00 | $15.10 | $14.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 31 | 33 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +14.7% | +2.3% | +8.1% | 0.0% |
MLGO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MGNI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
MLGO vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV vs IAS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) offers the better valuation at 1. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS?
On trailing P/E, MicroAlgo Inc.
(MLGO) is the cheapest at 1. 9x versus Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, Perion Network Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS?
Over the past 5 years, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) delivered a total return of -37. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PERI returned +139. 6% versus MLGO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
(IAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus MicroAlgo Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning MLGO is approximately 175% more volatile than IAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -19. 1% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -176. 0% for Perion Network Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DV leads at 18. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS?
MicroAlgo Inc.
(MLGO) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -1. 8% for Perion Network Ltd. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -3. 1% for PERI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DV leads at 82. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DV: 39. 2% to $15. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MLGO or PERI or MGNI or DV or IAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), +139. 6% 10Y return). MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PERI: +139. 6%, MLGO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLGO and PERI and MGNI and DV and IAS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MLGO (Technology) and PERI (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services) and DV (Technology) and IAS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MLGO is a small-cap deep-value stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; DV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 20%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.