Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MLI vs MWA vs NVT vs GFF vs ATKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Conglomerates
Electrical Equipment & Parts
MLI vs MWA vs NVT vs GFF vs ATKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Conglomerates | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $15.29B | $4.21B | $26.96B | $4.22B | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.37B | $1.46B | $4.33B | $2.35B | $2.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $847M | $207M | $492M | $35M | $-120M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 37.6% | 37.0% | 42.6% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 19.4% | 15.8% | 8.3% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 18.6x | 39.7x | 17.3x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $46M | $452M | $1.56B | $1.59B | $932M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.37B | $432M | $238M | $99M | $507M |
MLI vs MWA vs NVT vs GFF vs ATKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mueller Industries,… (MLI) | 100 | 1029.1 | +929.1% |
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 287.9 | +187.9% |
| nVent Electric plc (NVT) | 100 | 909.6 | +809.6% |
| Griffon Corporation (GFF) | 100 | 580.8 | +480.8% |
| Atkore Inc. (ATKR) | 100 | 275.6 | +175.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLI vs MWA vs NVT vs GFF vs ATKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs NVT's 5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 5.92x
- PEG 0.42 vs GFF's 0.97
- 19.4% margin vs ATKR's -4.2%
MWA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 1.0%
- Beta 1.02, yield 1.0%, current ratio 3.54x
- Beta 1.02 vs ATKR's 1.69, lower leverage
NVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- 29.5% revenue growth vs ATKR's -11.0%
- +178.6% vs ATKR's +12.1%
Among these 5 stocks, GFF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ATKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 17.3x)
- 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MWA's 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs ATKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 17.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs ATKR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs ATKR's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MWA's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +178.6% vs ATKR's +12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.9% ROA vs ATKR's -4.2%, ROIC 44.7% vs 9.0% |
MLI vs MWA vs NVT vs GFF vs ATKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MLI vs MWA vs NVT vs GFF vs ATKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories
ATKR leads 1 • NVT leads 1 • MWA leads 0 • GFF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 3.0x MWA's $1.5B. MLI is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATKR's -4.2%. On growth, NVT holds the edge at +53.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $1.5B | $4.3B | $2.3B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $333M | $848M | $241M | $291M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $847M | $207M | $492M | $35M | -$120M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $652M | $171M | $387M | $294M | $133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +37.6% | +37.0% | +42.6% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +19.4% | +15.8% | +8.3% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +14.2% | +11.4% | +1.5% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +11.7% | +8.9% | +12.5% | +4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +5.5% | +53.5% | -31.0% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.4% | +15.2% | -59.7% | -65.3% | +70.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ATKR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, MLI trades at a 76% valuation discount to GFF's 83.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MLI offers better value at 0.49x vs GFF's 4.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.3B | $4.2B | $27.0B | $4.2B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.0B | $4.2B | $28.3B | $5.7B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.09x | 22.04x | 38.68x | 83.18x | -164.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.02x | 18.65x | 39.70x | 17.30x | 14.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.49x | 1.00x | — | 4.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.49x | 14.07x | 34.30x | 21.23x | 7.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.66x | 2.94x | 6.93x | 1.68x | 0.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.06x | 4.31x | 7.36x | 57.22x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.27x | 24.45x | 72.49x | 13.91x | 8.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GFF delivers a 40.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-9 for ATKR. MLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GFF's 21.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs ATKR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.4% | +20.7% | +13.4% | +40.8% | -8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.9% | +11.4% | +7.2% | +1.7% | -4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +44.7% | +19.7% | +8.9% | +9.1% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.6% | +17.8% | +10.5% | +11.0% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.46x | 0.42x | 21.52x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $20M | $1.3B | $1.5B | $425M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $432M | $238M | $99M | $507M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46M | $452M | $1.6B | $1.6B | $932M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13483.55x | 22.98x | 6.61x | 2.30x | 1.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLI five years ago would be worth $59,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,629 for ATKR. Over the past 12 months, NVT leads with a +178.6% total return vs ATKR's +12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVT at 59.8% vs ATKR's -15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.3% | +12.6% | +56.5% | +21.1% | +15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.2% | +14.9% | +178.6% | +34.7% | +12.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +274.8% | +88.7% | +308.2% | +215.8% | -39.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +490.9% | +89.1% | +436.7% | +265.3% | -13.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +847.6% | +179.4% | +576.7% | +558.1% | +380.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.3% | +23.6% | +59.8% | +46.7% | -15.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MLI and MWA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MWA is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATKR's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLI currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs MWA's 86.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.02x | 1.68x | 1.36x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $140.84 | $31.00 | $174.50 | $97.58 | $80.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.16 | $22.74 | $59.73 | $65.01 | $53.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +86.7% | +95.5% | +92.9% | +92.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 41.2 | 82.3 | 63.3 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 679K | 1.0M | 2.3M | 348K | 384K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MWA and ATKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MLI as "Hold", MWA as "Hold", NVT as "Buy", GFF as "Buy", ATKR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.9% upside for MWA (target: $33) vs -19.6% for NVT (target: $134). For income investors, ATKR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.76% vs NVT's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.33 | $134.00 | $111.50 | $74.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 21 | 17 | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.0% | +0.5% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $0.27 | $0.79 | $0.85 | $1.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.4% | +0.9% | +4.3% | +4.0% |
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATKR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MLI vs MWA vs NVT vs GFF vs ATKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the stronger pick with 29.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate nVent Electric plc (NVT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR?
On trailing P/E, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Griffon Corporation at 83. 2x. On forward P/E, Atkore Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Griffon Corporation's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) delivered a total return of +490. 9%, compared to -13. 7% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLI returned +847. 6% versus MWA's +179. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Atkore Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning ATKR is approximately 66% more volatile than MWA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 22% for Griffon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nVent Electric plc (NVT) is pulling ahead at 29.
5% versus -11. 0% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: nVent Electric plc grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Atkore Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVT leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR?
Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -0. 5% for Atkore Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLI leads at 21. 4% versus 8. 2% for GFF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GFF leads at 42. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Griffon Corporation's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Atkore Inc. (ATKR) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for nVent Electric plc — 25. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MWA: 23. 9% to $33. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Atkore Inc. (ATKR) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 5% for nVent Electric plc (NVT).
09Is MLI or MWA or NVT or GFF or ATKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 7% yield, +847. 6% 10Y return). nVent Electric plc (NVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLI: +847. 6%, NVT: +576. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLI and MWA and NVT and GFF and ATKR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MLI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MWA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GFF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MLI, MWA, GFF, ATKR pay a dividend while NVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.