Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MLI vs NVT vs ATKR vs CARR vs EMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Construction
Industrial - Machinery
MLI vs NVT vs ATKR vs CARR vs EMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Construction | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $15.29B | $26.96B | $2.50B | $56.07B | $79.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.37B | $4.33B | $2.87B | $21.87B | $18.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $847M | $492M | $-120M | $1.32B | $2.44B |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 37.0% | 19.9% | 24.8% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 15.8% | 4.8% | 8.1% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 37.2x | 13.9x | 23.9x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $46M | $1.56B | $932M | $12.67B | $13.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.37B | $238M | $507M | $1.55B | $1.54B |
MLI vs NVT vs ATKR vs CARR vs EMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mueller Industries,… (MLI) | 100 | 1051.8 | +951.8% |
| nVent Electric plc (NVT) | 100 | 927.2 | +827.2% |
| Atkore Inc. (ATKR) | 100 | 276.8 | +176.8% |
| Carrier Global Corp… (CARR) | 100 | 326.5 | +226.5% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLI vs NVT vs ATKR vs CARR vs EMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs NVT's 5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 5.92x
- PEG 0.42 vs EMR's 4.81
- Beta 1.11, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.92x
NVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- 29.5% revenue growth vs ATKR's -11.0%
- +178.6% vs CARR's -2.8%
ATKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (13.9x vs 21.7x)
- 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%
CARR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs ATKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs ATKR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs ATKR's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +178.6% vs CARR's -2.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.9% ROA vs ATKR's -4.2%, ROIC 44.7% vs 9.0% |
MLI vs NVT vs ATKR vs CARR vs EMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MLI vs NVT vs ATKR vs CARR vs EMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories
ATKR leads 1 • NVT leads 1 • CARR leads 0 • EMR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MLI and EMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARR is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.9B annually — 7.6x ATKR's $2.9B. MLI is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATKR's -4.2%. On growth, NVT holds the edge at +53.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $4.3B | $2.9B | $21.9B | $18.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $848M | $291M | $3.1B | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $847M | $492M | -$120M | $1.3B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $652M | $387M | $133M | $1.7B | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +37.0% | +19.9% | +24.8% | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +15.8% | +4.8% | +8.1% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +11.4% | -4.2% | +6.0% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +8.9% | +4.6% | +7.6% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +53.5% | +4.2% | +2.4% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.4% | -59.7% | +70.1% | -40.4% | +28.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ATKR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, MLI trades at a 49% valuation discount to CARR's 39.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MLI offers better value at 0.49x vs EMR's 7.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.3B | $27.0B | $2.5B | $56.1B | $79.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.0B | $28.3B | $2.9B | $67.2B | $91.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.09x | 38.68x | -164.38x | 39.48x | 34.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.02x | 37.22x | 13.88x | 23.95x | 21.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.49x | — | — | — | 7.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.49x | 34.30x | 7.35x | 21.71x | 18.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.66x | 6.93x | 0.88x | 2.58x | 4.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.06x | 7.36x | 1.80x | 4.02x | 3.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.27x | 72.49x | 8.44x | 33.04x | 29.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-9 for ATKR. MLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARR's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMR scores 7/9 vs CARR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.4% | +13.4% | -8.7% | +9.1% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.9% | +7.2% | -4.2% | +3.5% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +44.7% | +8.9% | +9.0% | +6.7% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.6% | +10.5% | +9.8% | +7.2% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.42x | 0.67x | 0.90x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $1.3B | $425M | $11.1B | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $238M | $507M | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46M | $1.6B | $932M | $12.7B | $13.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13483.55x | 6.61x | 1.68x | 5.76x | 6.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLI five years ago would be worth $59,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,629 for ATKR. Over the past 12 months, NVT leads with a +178.6% total return vs CARR's -2.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVT at 59.8% vs ATKR's -15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.3% | +56.5% | +15.3% | +26.3% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.2% | +178.6% | +12.1% | -2.8% | +30.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +274.8% | +308.2% | -39.8% | +63.4% | +75.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +490.9% | +436.7% | -13.7% | +58.0% | +59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +847.6% | +576.7% | +380.6% | +493.6% | +206.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.3% | +59.8% | -15.6% | +17.8% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MLI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MLI is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATKR's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLI currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs CARR's 82.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.67x | 1.68x | 1.21x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $140.84 | $174.50 | $80.06 | $81.09 | $165.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.16 | $59.73 | $53.49 | $50.24 | $108.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +95.5% | +92.4% | +82.8% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 82.3 | 64.1 | 64.2 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 679K | 2.3M | 384K | 6.6M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ATKR and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MLI as "Hold", NVT as "Buy", ATKR as "Hold", CARR as "Buy", EMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for EMR (target: $162) vs 0.6% for CARR (target: $68). For income investors, ATKR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.76% vs NVT's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $180.29 | $79.50 | $67.50 | $161.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 19 | 11 | 26 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.5% | +1.8% | +1.4% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $0.79 | $1.30 | $0.91 | $2.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.9% | +4.0% | +5.2% | +1.6% |
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). ATKR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MLI vs NVT vs ATKR vs CARR vs EMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the stronger pick with 29.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate nVent Electric plc (NVT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR?
On trailing P/E, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Carrier Global Corporation at 39. 5x. On forward P/E, Atkore Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) delivered a total return of +490. 9%, compared to -13. 7% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLI returned +867. 6% versus EMR's +206. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Atkore Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning ATKR is approximately 50% more volatile than MLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 90% for Carrier Global Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nVent Electric plc (NVT) is pulling ahead at 29.
5% versus -11. 0% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: nVent Electric plc grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Atkore Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVT leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR?
Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -0. 5% for Atkore Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLI leads at 21. 4% versus 8. 3% for ATKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Atkore Inc. (ATKR) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 37. 2x for nVent Electric plc — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMR: 14. 8% to $161. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Atkore Inc. (ATKR) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 5% for nVent Electric plc (NVT).
09Is MLI or NVT or ATKR or CARR or EMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 0. 7% yield, +867. 6% 10Y return). nVent Electric plc (NVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLI: +867. 6%, NVT: +589. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLI and NVT and ATKR and CARR and EMR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MLI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ATKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MLI, ATKR, CARR, EMR pay a dividend while NVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.