Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MLP vs STRW vs PINE vs SBRA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Retail
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
MLP vs STRW vs PINE vs SBRA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Retail | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $309M | $170M | $281M | $5.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $145M | $65M | $813M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $7M | $-415K | $156M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 81.4% | -4.1% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | -25.6% | 54.3% | 28.0% | 29.0% |
| Forward P/E | 26.4x | 19.4x | 59.3x | 29.8x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $672M | $394M | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $48M | $5M | $72M |
MLP vs STRW vs PINE vs SBRA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maui Land & Pineapp… (MLP) | 100 | 170.1 | +70.1% |
| Strawberry Fields R… (STRW) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
| Sabra Health Care R… (SBRA) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLP vs STRW vs PINE vs SBRA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 24.5% FFO/revenue growth vs SBRA's 10.2%
STRW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 4.4%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 46.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.4%
- Beta 0.69, yield 4.4%, current ratio 7.37x
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 29.8x)
PINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 0.33x
- Beta 0.33 vs MLP's 1.31
- +37.3% vs MLP's +6.1%
SBRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 50.9% 10Y total return vs MLP's 191.3%
- 19.2% margin vs MLP's -61.6%
- 2.8% ROA vs MLP's -24.7%, ROIC 3.8% vs -18.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.5% FFO/revenue growth vs SBRA's 10.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 29.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.2% margin vs MLP's -61.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs MLP's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SBRA's 5.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs MLP's +6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs MLP's -24.7%, ROIC 3.8% vs -18.8% |
MLP vs STRW vs PINE vs SBRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MLP vs STRW vs PINE vs SBRA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRW leads in 3 of 6 categories
SBRA leads 2 • MLP leads 0 • PINE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $813M annually — 44.3x MLP's $18M. SBRA is the more profitable business, keeping 19.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MLP's -61.6%. On growth, MLP holds the edge at +49.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $145M | $65M | $813M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $123M | $45M | $432M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $7M | -$415,000 | $156M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3,000 | $88M | -$46M | $367M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +81.4% | -4.1% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.6% | +54.3% | +28.0% | +29.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -61.6% | +4.8% | -0.6% | +19.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +60.7% | -71.7% | +45.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.4% | +34.8% | +29.6% | +20.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.9% | +6.7% | +185.7% | -5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
STRW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, STRW trades at a 29% valuation discount to SBRA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STRW's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBRA's 17.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $309M | $170M | $281M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $306M | $793M | $671M | $7.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -41.24x | 22.72x | -89.27x | 32.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.43x | 19.44x | 59.32x | 29.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.31x | 14.63x | 17.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 26.75x | 1.45x | 4.65x | 6.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.26x | 1.10x | 1.01x | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.81x | — | 14.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-34 for MLP. MLP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRW's 8.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRW scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.5% | +11.2% | -0.1% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.7% | +0.8% | -0.1% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.8% | +7.2% | +2.2% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.7% | +9.0% | +2.8% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 8.04x | 1.31x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $623M | $390M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $48M | $5M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $672M | $394M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.24x | 1.82x | 0.82x | 2.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBRA five years ago would be worth $14,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,054 for MLP. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs MLP's +6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBRA at 28.7% vs MLP's 8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | +1.0% | +18.8% | +9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.1% | +29.7% | +37.3% | +20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.9% | +109.3% | +46.6% | +113.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.5% | +47.8% | +41.2% | +49.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.3% | +47.8% | +38.3% | +50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | +27.9% | +13.6% | +28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SBRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBRA is the less volatile stock with a -0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLP's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBRA currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs MLP's 77.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 0.69x | 0.33x | -0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.34 | $14.00 | $20.80 | $21.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.84 | $9.46 | $13.10 | $17.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +92.5% | +94.4% | +97.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 51.6 | 54.0 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 23K | 176K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRW and SBRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STRW as "Buy", PINE as "Buy", SBRA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for STRW (target: $15) vs 3.0% for SBRA (target: $21). For income investors, SBRA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.75% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.33 | $20.75 | $21.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 12 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.4% | +0.2% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.57 | $0.04 | $1.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +3.1% | 0.0% |
STRW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SBRA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
MLP vs STRW vs PINE vs SBRA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
(MLP) is the stronger pick with 24. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 2% for Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. (SBRA). Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA?
On trailing P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the cheapest at 22.
7x versus Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA?
Over the past 5 years, Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
(SBRA) delivered a total return of +49. 9%, compared to +40. 5% for Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLP returned +191. 3% versus PINE's +38. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
(SBRA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 06β versus Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning MLP is approximately -2115% more volatile than SBRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 8% for Strawberry Fields REIT LLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
(MLP) is pulling ahead at 24. 5% versus 10. 2% for Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. (SBRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Strawberry Fields REIT LLC grew EPS 46. 2% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRW leads at 10. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA?
Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
(SBRA) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus -63. 9% for Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STRW leads at 52. 4% versus -63. 6% for MLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STRW leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 39. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRW: 18. 4% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA?
In this comparison, SBRA (5.
8% yield), STRW (4. 4% yield), PINE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MLP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MLP or STRW or PINE or SBRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
(SBRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 06), 5. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBRA: +50. 9%, MLP: +191. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLP and STRW and PINE and SBRA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MLP is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRW is a small-cap high-growth stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBRA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. STRW, SBRA pay a dividend while MLP, PINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.