Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MLTX vs ARQT vs NKTR vs DAWN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MLTX vs ARQT vs NKTR vs DAWN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $2.58B | $1.69B | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $416M | $55M | $158M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-227M | $-2M | $-164M | $-107M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.9% | 99.6% | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.8% | -237.9% | -80.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 77.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $76M | $6M | $149M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $335M | $43M | $15M | $197M |
MLTX vs ARQT vs NKTR vs DAWN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoonLake Immunother… (MLTX) | 100 | 172.0 | +72.0% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLTX vs ARQT vs NKTR vs DAWN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 64.0% 10Y total return vs ARQT's -5.2%
ARQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs MLTX's -92.2%
- -0.6% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
- -0.6% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC -5.2% vs -57.2%
NKTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +8.2% vs MLTX's -54.3%
DAWN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.35
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.35, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.35 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs MLTX's -92.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.6% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs MLTX's -54.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC -5.2% vs -57.2% |
MLTX vs ARQT vs NKTR vs DAWN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MLTX vs ARQT vs NKTR vs DAWN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • DAWN leads 1 • MLTX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT and MLTX operate at a comparable scale, with $416M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.6% (ARQT) to -3.0% (NKTR). On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $416M | $55M | $158M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$242M | $6M | -$130M | -$124M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$227M | -$2M | -$164M | -$107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$196M | $27M | -$209M | -$108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.9% | +99.6% | +89.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.8% | -2.4% | -80.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -0.6% | -3.0% | -67.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.5% | -3.8% | -68.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.1% | -25.3% | +83.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.2% | +55.0% | -4.5% | +70.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.6B | $1.7B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $969M | $2.5B | $1.8B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.87x | -158.92x | -8.57x | -20.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 77.64x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.87x | 30.64x | 14.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.64x | 13.87x | 15.66x | 5.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. DAWN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARQT scores 4/9 vs MLTX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.7% | -1.4% | -4.0% | -23.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.6% | -0.6% | -62.8% | -20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -114.2% | -5.2% | -57.2% | -30.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.7% | -4.3% | -55.7% | -26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.03x | 1.66x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$259M | -$37M | $134M | -$194M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $335M | $43M | $15M | $197M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $6M | $149M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.31x | 2.08x | -4.74x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLTX five years ago would be worth $16,863 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,765 for NKTR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs MLTX's -54.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs MLTX's -14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.9% | -28.8% | +92.0% | +143.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.3% | +50.8% | +818.2% | +241.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.4% | +44.9% | +621.8% | +65.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.6% | -39.5% | -72.3% | -8.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.0% | -5.2% | -59.1% | -8.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.0% | +13.2% | +93.3% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs MLTX's 27.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.48x | 1.85x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.75 | $31.77 | $109.00 | $21.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.95 | $12.42 | $7.99 | $5.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.4% | +65.0% | +76.5% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.0 | 54.3 | 53.4 | 80.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 957K | 1.3M | 991K | 4.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MLTX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.8% upside for ARQT (target: $36) vs 10.3% for DAWN (target: $24).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.25 | $35.50 | $132.83 | $23.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 12 | 33 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns).
MLTX vs ARQT vs NKTR vs DAWN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLTX or ARQT or NKTR or DAWN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Analysts rate MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MLTX or ARQT or NKTR or DAWN?
Over the past 5 years, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) delivered a total return of +68.
6%, compared to -72. 3% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLTX returned +64. 0% versus NKTR's -59. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MLTX or ARQT or NKTR or DAWN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 422% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (DAWN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MLTX or ARQT or NKTR or DAWN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -86. 8% for MoonLake Immunotherapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MLTX or ARQT or NKTR or DAWN?
MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLTX leads at 0. 0% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MLTX or ARQT or NKTR or DAWN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARQT: 71.
8% to $35. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — MLTX or ARQT or NKTR or DAWN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MLTX or ARQT or NKTR or DAWN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35)). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAWN: -8. 4%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MLTX and ARQT and NKTR and DAWN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MLTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.