Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MLTX vs UCB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
MLTX vs UCB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.26B | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-227M | $328M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $76M | $205M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $335M | $203M |
MLTX vs UCB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoonLake Immunother… (MLTX) | 100 | 172.5 | +72.5% |
| United Community Ba… (UCB) | 100 | 162.1 | +62.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLTX vs UCB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, MLTX is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
UCB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 28.4%
- 110.6% 10Y total return vs MLTX's 68.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% NII/revenue growth vs MLTX's -92.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.4% margin vs MLTX's -1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs MLTX's 1.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.4% vs MLTX's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs MLTX's -53.6%, ROIC 8.2% vs -114.2% |
MLTX vs UCB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MLTX vs UCB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UCB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UCB and MLTX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$242M | $457M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$227M | $328M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$196M | $408M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +21.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +26.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.2% | +16.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MLTX and UCB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.01x | 12.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.75x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UCB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCB delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-75 for MLTX. UCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MLTX's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UCB scores 7/9 vs MLTX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.7% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -114.2% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.7% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$259M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $335M | $203M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $205M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.31x | 0.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLTX five years ago would be worth $17,370 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,083 for UCB. Over the past 12 months, UCB leads with a +25.4% total return vs MLTX's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UCB at 19.3% vs MLTX's -13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.1% | +8.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.9% | +25.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.6% | +70.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.7% | +10.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.7% | +110.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | +19.3% |
Risk & Volatility
UCB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UCB is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLTX's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UCB currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs MLTX's 28.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.75 | $36.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.95 | $27.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.2% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 969K | 829K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MLTX as "Buy" and UCB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.7% upside for MLTX (target: $25) vs 16.4% for UCB (target: $40). UCB is the only dividend payer here at 2.87% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.25 | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
UCB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
MLTX vs UCB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLTX or UCB a better buy right now?
United Community Banks, Inc.
(UCB) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MLTX or UCB?
Over the past 5 years, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) delivered a total return of +73.
7%, compared to +10. 8% for United Community Banks, Inc. (UCB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UCB returned +110. 6% versus MLTX's +68. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MLTX or UCB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Community Banks, Inc.
(UCB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus MoonLake Immunotherapeutics's 1. 17β — meaning MLTX is approximately 15% more volatile than UCB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Community Banks, Inc. (UCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 25% for MoonLake Immunotherapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MLTX or UCB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Community Banks, Inc.
grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to -86. 8% for MoonLake Immunotherapeutics. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MLTX or UCB?
United Community Banks, Inc.
(UCB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for MoonLake Immunotherapeutics — meaning it keeps 21. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UCB leads at 27. 5% versus 0. 0% for MLTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCB leads at 66. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MLTX or UCB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MLTX: 42.
7% to $25. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — MLTX or UCB?
In this comparison, UCB (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MLTX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MLTX or UCB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Community Banks, Inc.
(UCB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), 2. 9% yield, +110. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UCB: +110. 6%, MLTX: +68. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MLTX and UCB?
These companies operate in different sectors (MLTX (Healthcare) and UCB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MLTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UCB is a small-cap deep-value stock. UCB pays a dividend while MLTX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.