Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MLTX vs UCB vs SFNC vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MLTX vs UCB vs SFNC vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $4.02B | $3.09B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.54B | $627M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-227M | $328M | $-398M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.0% | 5.8% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.5% | -84.2% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.2x | 10.3x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $76M | $205M | $641M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $335M | $203M | $380M | $910M |
MLTX vs UCB vs SFNC vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoonLake Immunother… (MLTX) | 100 | 167.6 | +67.6% |
| United Community Ba… (UCB) | 100 | 160.3 | +60.3% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLTX vs UCB vs SFNC vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLTX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
UCB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 109.0% 10Y total return vs MLTX's 64.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 5.6%, current ratio 0.17x
- PEG 1.72 vs HOMB's 3.55
- +23.3% vs MLTX's -54.3%
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs MLTX's -92.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs MLTX's -92.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs MLTX's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.3% vs MLTX's -54.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs MLTX's -53.6%, ROIC 7.2% vs -114.2% |
MLTX vs UCB vs SFNC vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MLTX vs UCB vs SFNC vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
UCB leads 1 • MLTX leads 0 • HOMB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UCB and MLTX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.5B | $627M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$242M | $457M | -$497M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$227M | $328M | -$398M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$196M | $408M | $755M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.0% | +5.8% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +27.5% | -84.2% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +21.4% | -63.4% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +26.5% | +71.7% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.2% | +16.4% | +42.1% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UCB trades at a 4% valuation discount to HOMB's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UCB offers better value at 1.96x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $4.0B | $3.1B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $969M | $4.0B | $3.4B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.87x | 12.81x | -7.24x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.22x | 10.35x | 10.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.96x | — | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.80x | — | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.61x | 4.93x | 3.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.64x | 1.12x | 0.84x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.85x | 6.88x | 12.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — UCB and HOMB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-75 for MLTX. UCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UCB scores 7/9 vs MLTX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.7% | +9.1% | -11.6% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.6% | +1.2% | -1.6% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -114.2% | +8.2% | -9.1% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.7% | +10.3% | -4.2% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.06x | 0.19x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$259M | $3M | $261M | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $335M | $203M | $380M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $205M | $641M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.31x | 0.89x | -1.01x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLTX five years ago would be worth $16,863 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, UCB leads with a +23.3% total return vs MLTX's -54.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UCB at 18.9% vs MLTX's -14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.9% | +7.5% | +14.6% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.3% | +23.3% | +16.7% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.4% | +68.2% | +53.4% | +42.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.6% | +9.7% | -15.4% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.0% | +109.0% | +25.2% | +58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.0% | +18.9% | +15.3% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLTX's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs MLTX's 27.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.02x | 1.02x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.75 | $36.77 | $22.18 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.95 | $27.23 | $17.00 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.4% | +91.3% | +96.3% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.0 | 57.2 | 62.3 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 957K | 825K | 1.2M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MLTX as "Buy", UCB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.8% upside for MLTX (target: $25) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs HOMB's 2.79%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.25 | $39.50 | $22.67 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 7 | 9 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 | 6 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 | $0.85 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). UCB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
MLTX vs UCB vs SFNC vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). United Community Banks, Inc. (UCB) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, United Community Banks, Inc.
(UCB) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Community Banks, Inc. wins at 1. 72x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (MLTX) delivered a total return of +68.
6%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UCB returned +109. 0% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus MoonLake Immunotherapeutics's 1. 17β — meaning MLTX is approximately 44% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Community Banks, Inc. (UCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Community Banks, Inc. grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCB leads at 66. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Community Banks, Inc. (UCB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 72x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for United Community Banks, Inc. — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MLTX: 46. 8% to $25. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB?
In this comparison, SFNC (4.
0% yield), UCB (2. 9% yield), HOMB (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MLTX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MLTX or UCB or SFNC or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 2%, MLTX: +64. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLTX and UCB and SFNC and HOMB?
These companies operate in different sectors (MLTX (Healthcare) and UCB (Financial Services) and SFNC (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MLTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. UCB, SFNC, HOMB pay a dividend while MLTX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.