MMA vs GENI vs DKNG vs PENN vs FLUT

For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 4% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA). Analysts rate Genius Sports Limited (GENI) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) delivered a total return of -47. 9%, compared to -86. 9% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +160. 4% versus MMA's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited's 1. 42β — meaning MMA is approximately 34% more volatile than DKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.

0% versus -63. 4% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -25. 6% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLUT leads at 6. 3% versus -22. 3% for MMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMA leads at 71. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.

8x forward P/E versus 161. 2x for Genius Sports Limited — 144. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 134. 4% to $11. 17.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), +160. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKNG: +160. 4%, MMA: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MMA (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MMA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.