Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MMLP vs CAPL vs GEL vs NGL vs EPD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MMLP
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.+2.8%
CAPL
CrossAmerica Partners LP

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$812M
5Y Perf.+41.1%
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.02B
5Y Perf.+105.4%
NGL
NGL Energy Partners LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.00B
5Y Perf.+216.3%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$81.56B
5Y Perf.+97.5%

MMLP vs CAPL vs GEL vs NGL vs EPD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MMLP logoMMLP
CAPL logoCAPL
GEL logoGEL
NGL logoNGL
EPD logoEPD
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Refining & MarketingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$100M$812M$2.02B$2.00B$81.56B
Revenue (TTM)$711M$4.62B$1.68B$3.03B$52.60B
Net Income (TTM)$-20M$60M$48M$159M$5.80B
Gross Margin22.3%8.5%16.8%46.8%13.6%
Operating Margin5.8%2.6%18.6%13.3%13.5%
Forward P/E49.5x20.9x47.4x13.1x
Total Debt$525M$908M$3.05B$3.08B$34.93B
Cash & Equiv.$49K$3M$6M$6M$1.25B

MMLP vs CAPL vs GEL vs NGL vs EPDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MMLP
CAPL
GEL
NGL
EPD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Martin Midstream Pa… (MMLP)100102.8+2.8%
CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL)100141.1+41.1%
Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL)100205.4+105.4%
NGL Energy Partners… (NGL)100316.3+216.3%
Enterprise Products… (EPD)100197.5+97.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MMLP vs CAPL vs GEL vs NGL vs EPD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EPD leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. NGL Energy Partners LP is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. MMLP and CAPL also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MMLP
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
The Growth Leader

MMLP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 1.2% revenue growth vs GEL's -45.0%
Best for: growth
CAPL
CrossAmerica Partners LP
The Growth Play

CAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -10.6%, EPS growth 109.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.7%
  • Beta 0.06 vs NGL's 0.67
Best for: growth exposure
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GEL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
NGL
NGL Energy Partners LP
The Defensive Pick

NGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.67, yield 14.3%, current ratio 1.30x
  • 14.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7%
  • +417.0% vs MMLP's -14.5%
Best for: defensive
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
The Income Pick

EPD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 5.7%
  • 119.8% 10Y total return vs NGL's 78.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.04x
  • Lower P/E (13.1x vs 47.4x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMMLP logoMMLP1.2% revenue growth vs GEL's -45.0%
ValueEPD logoEPDLower P/E (13.1x vs 47.4x)
Quality / MarginsEPD logoEPD11.0% margin vs MMLP's -2.8%
Stability / SafetyCAPL logoCAPLBeta 0.06 vs NGL's 0.67
DividendsNGL logoNGL14.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7%
Momentum (1Y)NGL logoNGL+417.0% vs MMLP's -14.5%
Efficiency (ROA)EPD logoEPD7.5% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 8.3% vs 8.0%

MMLP vs CAPL vs GEL vs NGL vs EPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MMLPMartin Midstream Partners L.P.
FY 2025
Product
36.2%$396M
Specialty Products
22.7%$249M
Transportation
19.4%$213M
Sulfur Service, Product Sales
13.5%$148M
Terminalling And Storage
8.3%$91M
CAPLCrossAmerica Partners LP
FY 2025
Fuel Sales To External Customers
88.0%$3.2B
Food And Merchandise Sales
11.3%$407M
Product and Service, Other
0.7%$24M
GELGenesis Energy, L.P.
FY 2025
Product Sales
89.5%$634M
Refinery Services
10.5%$74M
NGLNGL Energy Partners LP
FY 2025
Liquids Logistics Segment
52.9%$1.8B
Crude Oil Logistics Segment
25.4%$880M
Water Solutions Segment
21.8%$756M
EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P.
FY 2025
NGL Pipelines and Services
160.4%$84.4B
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines and Services
120.0%$63.1B
Petrochemical and Refined Products Services
59.9%$31.5B
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines and Services
9.7%$5.1B
Intersegment Eliminations
-250.1%$-131,540,000,000

MMLP vs CAPL vs GEL vs NGL vs EPD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGELLAGGINGCAPL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GEL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EPD is the larger business by revenue, generating $52.6B annually — 73.9x MMLP's $711M. EPD is the more profitable business, keeping 11.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MMLP's -2.8%. On growth, GEL holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …CAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…GEL logoGELGenesis Energy, L…NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…EPD logoEPDEnterprise Produc…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$711M$4.6B$1.7B$3.0B$52.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$91M$200M$550M$672M$9.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$20M$60M$48M$159M$5.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15M$75M$209M$291M$3.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.3%+8.5%+16.8%+46.8%+13.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.8%+2.6%+18.6%+13.3%+13.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.8%+1.3%+2.9%+5.3%+11.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.2%+1.6%+12.5%+9.6%+5.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.5%-100.0%+12.1%-41.3%-2.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.6%+2.4%+103.9%+4.2%+2.7%
GEL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MMLP and EPD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.2x trailing earnings, EPD trades at a 27% valuation discount to CAPL's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAPL's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EPD's 12.1x.

MetricMMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …CAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…GEL logoGELGenesis Energy, L…NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…EPD logoEPDEnterprise Produc…
Market CapShares × price$100M$812M$2.0B$2.0B$81.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$625M$1.7B$5.1B$5.1B$115.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.95x19.54x-22.56x-26.88x14.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.49.53x20.85x47.44x13.14x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.54x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.44x5.80x10.31x8.51x12.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.14x0.22x1.24x0.58x1.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.85x3.05x2.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.17x14.57x22.83x38.67x27.51x
Evenly matched — MMLP and EPD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EPD leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

NGL delivers a 132.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $133 in annual profit, vs $6 for GEL. EPD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NGL's 4.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGL scores 7/9 vs MMLP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …CAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…GEL logoGELGenesis Energy, L…NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…EPD logoEPDEnterprise Produc…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.1%+132.6%+19.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.9%+6.0%+1.0%+3.6%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.0%+18.1%+4.0%+6.4%+8.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.4%+23.4%+5.0%+8.3%+10.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935476
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.30x4.42x1.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$525M$905M$3.0B$3.1B$33.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$49,000$3M$6M$6M$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$525M$908M$3.0B$3.1B$34.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.72x1.86x1.97x2.15x5.21x
EPD leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NGL five years ago would be worth $72,658 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,438 for MMLP. Over the past 12 months, NGL leads with a +417.0% total return vs MMLP's -14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGL at 80.6% vs MMLP's 1.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …CAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…GEL logoGELGenesis Energy, L…NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…EPD logoEPDEnterprise Produc…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.6%+8.4%+6.0%+62.9%+20.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-14.5%+2.7%+19.5%+417.0%+31.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.0%+34.7%+86.9%+488.7%+73.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.4%+56.1%+109.0%+626.6%+105.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.7%+87.5%-8.4%+78.8%+119.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.6%+10.4%+23.2%+80.6%+20.2%
NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CAPL and NGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NGL's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGL currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs MMLP's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …CAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…GEL logoGELGenesis Energy, L…NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…EPD logoEPDEnterprise Produc…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.39x0.06x0.32x0.67x0.06x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.54$23.62$18.64$16.69$39.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.21$19.61$13.21$2.98$29.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.6%+90.2%+88.4%+96.6%+95.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.541.335.465.047.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded19K50K246K238K4.1M
Evenly matched — CAPL and NGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NGL and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MMLP as "Buy", CAPL as "Hold", GEL as "Buy", NGL as "Hold", EPD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.4% upside for GEL (target: $20) vs -87.6% for NGL (target: $2). For income investors, NGL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.34% vs MMLP's 0.80%.

MetricMMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …CAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…GEL logoGELGenesis Energy, L…NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…EPD logoEPDEnterprise Produc…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.00$2.00$37.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1115161745
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+9.9%+4.0%+14.3%+5.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises223215
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02$2.10$0.66$2.31$2.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+13.0%+0.1%+0.4%
Evenly matched — NGL and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GEL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). EPD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallGenesis Energy, L.P. (GEL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MMLP vs CAPL vs GEL vs NGL vs EPD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Martin Midstream Partners L.

P. (MMLP) is the stronger pick with 1. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD?

On trailing P/E, Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus CrossAmerica Partners LP at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD?

Over the past 5 years, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) delivered a total return of +626.

6%, compared to +14. 4% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPD returned +119. 8% versus MMLP's -57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus NGL Energy Partners LP's 0. 67β — meaning NGL is approximately 1105% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 4% for NGL Energy Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Martin Midstream Partners L.

P. (MMLP) is pulling ahead at 1. 2% versus -45. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CrossAmerica Partners LP grew EPS 109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPD leads at -3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD?

Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 1% net margin versus -2. 0% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 11. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEL leads at 15. 8% versus 5. 6% for CAPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GEL leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 36. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GEL: 21. 4% to $20. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) offers the highest yield at 14. 3%, versus 0. 8% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP).

09

Is MMLP or CAPL or GEL or NGL or EPD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 5. 7% yield, +119. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPD: +119. 8%, NGL: +78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MMLP and CAPL and GEL and NGL and EPD?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MMLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NGL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MMLP

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CAPL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 3.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GEL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NGL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EPD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MMLP and CAPL and GEL and NGL and EPD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MMLP: -2.5% · CAPL: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.