MMYT vs TRIP

For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) offers the better valuation at 36. 2x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tripadvisor, Inc.

(TRIP) is the cheapest at 36. 2x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Tripadvisor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.

0%, compared to -74. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMYT returned +190. 1% versus TRIP's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

17β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning TRIP is approximately 62% more volatile than MMYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 192% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.

0% versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for MakeMyTrip Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

7% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMYT leads at 12. 3% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMYT leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Tripadvisor, Inc.

(TRIP) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 65. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

17), +190. 1% 10Y return). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMYT: +190. 1%, TRIP: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRIP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.