TRIP vs EXPE

For growth investors, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the stronger pick with 7. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) a "Hold" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Tripadvisor, Inc. at 33. 7x. On forward P/E, Tripadvisor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) delivered a total return of +34. 1%, compared to -76. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPE returned +110. 4% versus TRIP's -77. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 41β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning TRIP is approximately 29% more volatile than EXPE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 192% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is pulling ahead at 7. 6% versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to 9. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRIP leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPE leads at 13. 4% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXPE leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Tripadvisor, Inc.

(TRIP) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Expedia Group, Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRIP: 21. 0% to $12. 64.

In this comparison, EXPE (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. TRIP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield, +110. 4% 10Y return). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPE: +110. 4%, TRIP: -77. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

EXPE pays a dividend while TRIP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.