Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-46.3%
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.77B
5Y Perf.+39.4%
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.-69.2%
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.12B
5Y Perf.+534.9%
CSGS
CSG Systems International, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.29B
5Y Perf.+69.8%

MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MNDO logoMNDO
NTCT logoNTCT
SHEN logoSHEN
LQDT logoLQDT
CSGS logoCSGS
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureTelecommunications ServicesSpecialty RetailSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$21M$2.77B$898M$1.12B$2.29B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$861M$266M$480M$1.24B
Net Income (TTM)$3M$96M$-36M$30M$64M
Gross Margin51.0%79.2%37.9%23.2%48.3%
Operating Margin10.7%12.8%-10.3%8.4%13.9%
Forward P/E7.8x15.9x24.3x15.9x
Total Debt$929K$76M$642M$14M$587M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$457M$27M$175M$180M

MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MNDO
NTCT
SHEN
LQDT
CSGS
StockMay 20May 26Return
MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO)10053.7-46.3%
NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT)100139.4+39.4%
Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN)10030.8-69.2%
Liquidity Services,… (LQDT)100634.9+534.9%
CSG Systems Interna… (CSGS)100169.8+69.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MNDO leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. NetScout Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. LQDT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
The Income Pick

MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
  • Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
  • Lower P/E (7.8x vs 15.9x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +80.5% vs MNDO's -34.8%
Best for: momentum
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
The Communication Services Pick

SHEN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
The Growth Play

LQDT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 31.2%, EPS growth 38.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs CSGS's 114.6%
  • 31.2% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CSGS
CSG Systems International, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CSGS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLQDT logoLQDT31.2% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
ValueMNDO logoMNDOLower P/E (7.8x vs 15.9x)
Quality / MarginsMNDO logoMNDO13.4% margin vs SHEN's -13.7%
Stability / SafetyMNDO logoMNDOBeta 0.07 vs NTCT's 1.12, lower leverage
DividendsMNDO logoMNDO21.6% yield, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NTCT logoNTCT+80.5% vs MNDO's -34.8%
Efficiency (ROA)MNDO logoMNDO8.6% ROA vs SHEN's -2.0%, ROIC 8.6% vs -1.1%

MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd
FY 2025
Service
96.2%$19M
License
3.8%$733,000
NTCTNetScout Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
56.3%$463M
Product
43.7%$360M
SHENShenandoah Telecommunications Company
FY 2025
Service
100.0%$351M
LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$311M
CSGSCSG Systems International, Inc.
FY 2025
Software as a Service and Related Solutions
90.1%$1.1B
License and Service
6.1%$74M
Maintenance
3.9%$47M

MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMNDOLAGGINGSHEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CSGS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 63.6x MNDO's $19M. MNDO is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHEN's -13.7%. On growth, CSGS holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdNTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CSGS logoCSGSCSG Systems Inter…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$861M$266M$480M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M$171M$104M$51M$225M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3M$96M-$36M$30M$64M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4M$275M-$276M$78M$131M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.0%+79.2%+37.9%+23.2%+48.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.7%+12.8%-10.3%+8.4%+13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.4%+11.1%-13.7%+6.3%+5.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.9%+32.0%-103.5%+16.2%+10.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.0%-0.5%-100.0%+3.7%+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-23.4%+11.9%-18.2%+4.5%+45.6%
CSGS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MNDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 81% valuation discount to LQDT's 41.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LQDT's 21.2x.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdNTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CSGS logoCSGSCSG Systems Inter…
Market CapShares × price$21M$2.8B$898M$1.1B$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13M$2.4B$1.5B$964M$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.77x-7.57x-22.86x41.67x40.60x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.87x24.33x15.86x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate23.89x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.68x13.80x21.19x7.26x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.06x3.36x2.51x2.36x1.87x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x1.78x0.92x5.78x8.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.20x13.11x19.07x16.21x
MNDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MNDO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

CSGS delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SHEN. MNDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSGS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LQDT scores 7/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdNTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CSGS logoCSGSCSG Systems Inter…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.9%+6.1%-3.7%+14.2%+22.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.6%+4.3%-2.0%+8.0%+4.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.6%-19.3%-1.1%+60.8%+32.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.8%-18.5%-1.3%+17.3%+33.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946375
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.05x0.66x0.07x2.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M-$381M$614M-$160M$407M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$457M$27M$175M$180M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$929,000$76M$642M$14M$587M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense55.89x-0.65x6.10x
MNDO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LQDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CSGS five years ago would be worth $18,936 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,502 for MNDO. Over the past 12 months, NTCT leads with a +80.5% total return vs MNDO's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LQDT at 37.0% vs MNDO's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdNTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CSGS logoCSGSCSG Systems Inter…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.7%+42.6%+43.5%+22.5%+5.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-34.8%+80.5%+41.3%+15.0%+33.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.2%+30.3%-13.6%+157.1%+72.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.0%+42.9%-27.9%+47.8%+89.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+66.7%+66.6%+21.6%+508.2%+114.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-8.8%+9.2%-4.8%+37.0%+19.9%
LQDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MNDO and CSGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTCT's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSGS currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs MNDO's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdNTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CSGS logoCSGSCSG Systems Inter…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.07x1.12x0.89x0.76x0.44x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.64$39.24$17.34$38.83$80.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.98$19.98$9.66$21.67$60.04
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.6%+97.6%+93.6%+93.4%+99.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10027.468.655.281.656.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded37K552K300K159K342K
Evenly matched — MNDO and CSGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MNDO and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NTCT as "Hold", SHEN as "Buy", LQDT as "Buy", CSGS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -24.3% for NTCT (target: $29). For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs SHEN's 0.72%.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdNTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LQDT logoLQDTLiquidity Service…CSGS logoCSGSCSG Systems Inter…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$29.00$44.00$80.70
# AnalystsCovering analysts2181415
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+21.6%+0.7%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0311
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.22$0.12$1.33
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+0.9%0.0%+1.4%+3.6%
Evenly matched — MNDO and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MNDO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CSGS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallMIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Liquidity Services, Inc.

(LQDT) is the stronger pick with 31. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?

On trailing P/E, MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Liquidity Services, Inc. at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, CSG Systems International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?

Over the past 5 years, CSG Systems International, Inc.

(CSGS) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -35. 0% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LQDT returned +508. 2% versus SHEN's +21. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus NetScout Systems, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning NTCT is approximately 1528% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for CSG Systems International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liquidity Services, Inc.

(LQDT) is pulling ahead at 31. 2% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Liquidity Services, Inc. grew EPS 38. 1% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LQDT leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?

MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 4% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSGS leads at 24. 5% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTCT leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, CSG Systems International, Inc.

(CSGS) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Liquidity Services, Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78. 7% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?

In this comparison, MNDO (21.

6% yield), CSGS (1. 6% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NTCT, LQDT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, NTCT: +66. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MNDO and NTCT and SHEN and LQDT and CSGS?

These companies operate in different sectors (MNDO (Technology) and NTCT (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services) and LQDT (Consumer Cyclical) and CSGS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LQDT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO, SHEN, CSGS pay a dividend while NTCT, LQDT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MNDO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 8.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTCT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHEN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LQDT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSGS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MNDO and NTCT and SHEN and LQDT and CSGS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MNDO: -6.0% · NTCT: -0.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(MNDO: 13.4% · NTCT: 11.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.