Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Telecommunications Services
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Telecommunications Services | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $21M | $2.77B | $898M | $1.12B | $2.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $861M | $266M | $480M | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $96M | $-36M | $30M | $64M |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 79.2% | 37.9% | 23.2% | 48.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 12.8% | -10.3% | 8.4% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 15.9x | — | 24.3x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $929K | $76M | $642M | $14M | $587M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $457M | $27M | $175M | $180M |
MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
| Liquidity Services,… (LQDT) | 100 | 634.9 | +534.9% |
| CSG Systems Interna… (CSGS) | 100 | 169.8 | +69.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 15.9x)
NTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +80.5% vs MNDO's -34.8%
SHEN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LQDT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 31.2%, EPS growth 38.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs CSGS's 114.6%
- 31.2% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
Among these 5 stocks, CSGS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.2% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs SHEN's -13.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs NTCT's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 21.6% yield, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.5% vs MNDO's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SHEN's -2.0%, ROIC 8.6% vs -1.1% |
MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MNDO leads in 2 of 6 categories
CSGS leads 1 • LQDT leads 1 • NTCT leads 0 • SHEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 63.6x MNDO's $19M. MNDO is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHEN's -13.7%. On growth, CSGS holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $861M | $266M | $480M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $171M | $104M | $51M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $96M | -$36M | $30M | $64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $275M | -$276M | $78M | $131M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +79.2% | +37.9% | +23.2% | +48.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +12.8% | -10.3% | +8.4% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +11.1% | -13.7% | +6.3% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +32.0% | -103.5% | +16.2% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | -0.5% | -100.0% | +3.7% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.4% | +11.9% | -18.2% | +4.5% | +45.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MNDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 81% valuation discount to LQDT's 41.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LQDT's 21.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $2.8B | $898M | $1.1B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $2.4B | $1.5B | $964M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.77x | -7.57x | -22.86x | 41.67x | 40.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.87x | — | 24.33x | 15.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 23.89x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.68x | — | 13.80x | 21.19x | 7.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 3.36x | 2.51x | 2.36x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.78x | 0.92x | 5.78x | 8.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.20x | 13.11x | — | 19.07x | 16.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSGS delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SHEN. MNDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSGS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LQDT scores 7/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +6.1% | -3.7% | +14.2% | +22.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +4.3% | -2.0% | +8.0% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | -19.3% | -1.1% | +60.8% | +32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | -18.5% | -1.3% | +17.3% | +33.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.05x | 0.66x | 0.07x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$381M | $614M | -$160M | $407M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $457M | $27M | $175M | $180M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $929,000 | $76M | $642M | $14M | $587M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 55.89x | -0.65x | — | 6.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LQDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSGS five years ago would be worth $18,936 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,502 for MNDO. Over the past 12 months, NTCT leads with a +80.5% total return vs MNDO's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LQDT at 37.0% vs MNDO's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | +42.6% | +43.5% | +22.5% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.8% | +80.5% | +41.3% | +15.0% | +33.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.2% | +30.3% | -13.6% | +157.1% | +72.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | +42.9% | -27.9% | +47.8% | +89.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.7% | +66.6% | +21.6% | +508.2% | +114.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.8% | +9.2% | -4.8% | +37.0% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNDO and CSGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTCT's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSGS currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs MNDO's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 1.12x | 0.89x | 0.76x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.64 | $39.24 | $17.34 | $38.83 | $80.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $19.98 | $9.66 | $21.67 | $60.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +97.6% | +93.6% | +93.4% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.4 | 68.6 | 55.2 | 81.6 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 552K | 300K | 159K | 342K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNDO and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTCT as "Hold", SHEN as "Buy", LQDT as "Buy", CSGS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -24.3% for NTCT (target: $29). For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs SHEN's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 | $29.00 | $44.00 | $80.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 8 | 14 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +21.6% | — | +0.7% | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.22 | — | $0.12 | — | $1.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +3.6% |
MNDO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CSGS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MNDO vs NTCT vs SHEN vs LQDT vs CSGS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is the stronger pick with 31. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Liquidity Services, Inc. at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, CSG Systems International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?
Over the past 5 years, CSG Systems International, Inc.
(CSGS) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -35. 0% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LQDT returned +508. 2% versus SHEN's +21. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus NetScout Systems, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning NTCT is approximately 1528% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for CSG Systems International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is pulling ahead at 31. 2% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Liquidity Services, Inc. grew EPS 38. 1% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LQDT leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?
MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 4% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSGS leads at 24. 5% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTCT leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CSG Systems International, Inc.
(CSGS) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Liquidity Services, Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78. 7% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield), CSGS (1. 6% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NTCT, LQDT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNDO or NTCT or SHEN or LQDT or CSGS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, NTCT: +66. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNDO and NTCT and SHEN and LQDT and CSGS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MNDO (Technology) and NTCT (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services) and LQDT (Consumer Cyclical) and CSGS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LQDT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO, SHEN, CSGS pay a dividend while NTCT, LQDT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.