Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MNKD vs INSM vs RARE vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MNKD vs INSM vs RARE vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $22.62B | $2.57B | $3.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $361M | $606M | $669M | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-1.28B | $-609M | $376M |
| Gross Margin | 79.3% | 79.4% | 83.6% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | -194.0% | -83.9% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | 177.5x | — | — | 55.6x |
| Total Debt | $473M | $768M | $1.28B | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $510M | $434M | $178M |
MNKD vs INSM vs RARE vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 233.1 | +133.1% |
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 417.0 | +317.0% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNKD vs INSM vs RARE vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNKD plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
INSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.54
- Rev growth 66.7%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs ACAD's -22.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 3.83x
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 34.3% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
- 26.2% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -86.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.7% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs INSM's -210.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs MNKD's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -86.5% |
MNKD vs INSM vs RARE vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNKD vs INSM vs RARE vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories
INSM leads 1 • MNKD leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 3.0x MNKD's $361M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -2.1%. On growth, INSM holds the edge at +152.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $361M | $606M | $669M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | -$1.2B | -$536M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$1.3B | -$609M | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | -$998M | -$487M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.3% | +79.4% | +83.6% | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | -194.0% | -83.9% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -2.1% | -91.0% | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -164.5% | -72.8% | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | +152.6% | -2.4% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -16.7% | -17.2% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 94% valuation discount to MNKD's 177.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNKD's 29.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $22.6B | $2.6B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $22.9B | $3.4B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 177.50x | -16.35x | -4.48x | 9.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 55.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.26x | — | — | 26.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.14x | 37.30x | 3.82x | 3.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 30.30x | — | 3.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 80.08x | — | — | 36.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSM's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs RARE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -168.4% | -6.1% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | -57.3% | -45.8% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | -86.5% | -89.4% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | -66.8% | -46.4% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.04x | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $399M | $258M | $842M | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $510M | $434M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $473M | $768M | $1.3B | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | -14.23x | -14.49x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, INSM leads with a +53.5% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSM at 77.0% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.6% | -40.8% | +10.7% | -13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.8% | +53.5% | -21.8% | +52.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | +454.5% | -44.5% | +4.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | +221.7% | -77.2% | +7.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.2% | +793.5% | -59.4% | -22.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.9% | +77.0% | -17.8% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSM and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACAD currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.54x | 1.36x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.51 | $212.75 | $42.37 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.23 | $63.81 | $18.29 | $14.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.5% | +49.3% | +61.7% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.3 | 41.9 | 66.6 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 2.3M | 1.8M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNKD as "Buy", INSM as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 132.4% upside for MNKD (target: $8) vs 54.1% for ACAD (target: $35).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.25 | $214.22 | $48.36 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 35 | 33 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). INSM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MNKD vs INSM vs RARE vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger pick with 66.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MannKind Corporation (MNKD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus MannKind Corporation at 177. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +221.
7%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +763. 6% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RARE is approximately 154% more volatile than INSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 104% for Insmed Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is pulling ahead at 66.
7% versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -210. 5% for Insmed Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNKD leads at 11. 1% versus -194. 0% for INSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNKD: 132.
4% to $8. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MNKD or INSM or RARE or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +763. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +763. 6%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNKD and INSM and RARE and ACAD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.