Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNKD vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MNKD vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $2.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $361M | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | 79.3% | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | -83.9% |
| Forward P/E | 217.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $473M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $434M |
MNKD vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNKD vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNKD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.90
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth -79.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.8%
- -46.2% 10Y total return vs RARE's -59.4%
RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -21.8% vs MNKD's -26.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs RARE's 20.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.6% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.8% vs MNKD's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.9% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 21.6% vs -89.4% |
MNKD vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNKD vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNKD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE is the larger business by revenue, generating $669M annually — 1.9x MNKD's $361M. MNKD is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, MNKD holds the edge at +15.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $361M | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.3% | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNKD and RARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 177.50x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 217.79x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.26x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.14x | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 80.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNKD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $399M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $473M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNKD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNKD five years ago would be worth $8,275 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, RARE leads with a -21.8% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNKD at -2.9% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.6% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.8% | -21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | -44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | -77.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.2% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.9% | -17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNKD and RARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNKD is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RARE currently trades 61.7% from its 52-week high vs MNKD's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.51 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.23 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.5% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.3 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNKD as "Buy" and RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.2% upside for MNKD (target: $7) vs 97.1% for RARE (target: $52).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MNKD leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
MNKD vs RARE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNKD or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the stronger pick with 22.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). MannKind Corporation (MNKD) offers the better valuation at 177. 5x trailing P/E (217. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MannKind Corporation (MNKD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MNKD or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) delivered a total return of -17.
2%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNKD returned -46. 2% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MNKD or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 58% more volatile than MNKD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MNKD or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is pulling ahead at 22.
2% versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. grew EPS 7. 3% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MNKD or RARE?
MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
7% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNKD leads at 11. 1% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RARE leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MNKD or RARE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNKD: 97.
2% to $7. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — MNKD or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MNKD or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNKD: -46. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MNKD and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.