Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MNOV vs SIGA vs GILD vs AVTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
MNOV vs SIGA vs GILD vs AVTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $70M | $339M | $166.40B | $423M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $410K | $94M | $29.73B | $-209K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-4.04T | $9.22B | $-78M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 61.8% | 63.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -32.4% | 27.7% | 38.2% | -1236.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.8x | 15.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $194K | $595K | $24.59B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $155M | $7.56B | $16M |
MNOV vs SIGA vs GILD vs AVTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MediciNova, Inc. (MNOV) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
| SIGA Technologies, … (SIGA) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Gilead Sciences, In… (GILD) | 100 | 172.2 | +72.2% |
| Avalo Therapeutics,… (AVTX) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNOV vs SIGA vs GILD vs AVTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNOV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 8.16x
- Beta 0.31 vs AVTX's 1.21
SIGA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs GILD's 87.8%
- Beta 1.15, yield 12.7%, current ratio 11.83x
- Better valuation composite
- 12.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GILD's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
GILD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.4%
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth 16.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- 2.4% revenue growth vs AVTX's -86.6%
- 31.0% margin vs SIGA's -43K%
AVTX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +413.9% vs MNOV's -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.4% revenue growth vs AVTX's -86.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.0% margin vs SIGA's -43K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs AVTX's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 12.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GILD's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +413.9% vs MNOV's -4.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.1% ROA vs AVTX's -61.8%, ROIC 23.4% vs -165.1% |
MNOV vs SIGA vs GILD vs AVTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MNOV vs SIGA vs GILD vs AVTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GILD leads in 3 of 6 categories
SIGA leads 1 • MNOV leads 0 • AVTX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILD and AVTX operate at a comparable scale, with $29.7B and -$209,000 in trailing revenue. GILD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIGA's -43117.4%. On growth, GILD holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $409,657 | $94M | $29.7B | -$209,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $26M | $12.1B | -$72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$4.04T | $9.2B | -$78M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $33M | $10.3B | -$51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +61.8% | +63.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | +27.7% | +38.2% | -1236.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | -43117.4% | +31.0% | -1326.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | +35.2% | +34.8% | -872.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -11.3% | +4.4% | -2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | — | +54.8% | -104.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SIGA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, SIGA trades at a 28% valuation discount to GILD's 19.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIGA's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GILD's 17.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70M | $339M | $166.4B | $423M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | $185M | $183.4B | $408M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.96x | 14.33x | 19.77x | -3.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.78x | 15.69x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.60x | 16.95x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 171.21x | 3.58x | 5.65x | 7176.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.69x | 1.70x | 7.44x | 3.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.96x | 17.60x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GILD leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GILD delivers a 42.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-78 for AVTX. SIGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GILD's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GILD scores 9/9 vs AVTX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.9% | -10.7% | +42.3% | -77.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.3% | -7.4% | +16.1% | -61.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -85.5% | +33.7% | +23.4% | -165.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | +11.3% | +25.1% | -59.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x | 1.09x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$154M | $17.0B | -$16M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $155M | $7.6B | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $194,331 | $595,169 | $24.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 8.87x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GILD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GILD five years ago would be worth $22,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29 for AVTX. Over the past 12 months, AVTX leads with a +413.9% total return vs MNOV's -4.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GILD at 22.2% vs AVTX's -67.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | -15.0% | +10.9% | +34.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.0% | +1.5% | +38.8% | +413.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | +22.2% | +82.4% | -96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.1% | +1.4% | +124.2% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.1% | +764.0% | +87.8% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | +6.9% | +22.2% | -67.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNOV and AVTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNOV is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVTX's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVTX currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs SIGA's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 1.15x | 0.66x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.96 | $9.62 | $157.29 | $24.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $4.29 | $95.30 | $3.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.0% | +49.2% | +85.2% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 47.0 | 52.6 | 76.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 688K | 5.8M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SIGA and GILD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIGA as "Buy", GILD as "Buy", AVTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.7% upside for AVTX (target: $46) vs 20.8% for GILD (target: $162). For income investors, SIGA offers the higher dividend yield at 12.73% vs GILD's 2.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $161.88 | $45.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 58 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +12.7% | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 11 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 | $3.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.0% |
GILD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIGA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MNOV vs SIGA vs GILD vs AVTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the stronger pick with 2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -86. 6% for Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. (AVTX). SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (2. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX?
On trailing P/E, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Gilead Sciences, Inc. at 19. 8x. On forward P/E, SIGA Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX?
Over the past 5 years, Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) delivered a total return of +124. 2%, compared to -99. 7% for Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. (AVTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIGA returned +764. 0% versus AVTX's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning AVTX is approximately 292% more volatile than MNOV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 109% for Gilead Sciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is pulling ahead at 2. 4% versus -86. 6% for Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. (AVTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gilead Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 1684% year-over-year, compared to -79. 1% for Avalo Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GILD leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX?
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 9% net margin versus -1326. 4% for Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GILD leads at 40. 1% versus -1236. 0% for AVTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GILD leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) trades at 2. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for Gilead Sciences, Inc. — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVTX: 99. 7% to $45. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX?
In this comparison, SIGA (12.
7% yield), GILD (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. MNOV, AVTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNOV or SIGA or GILD or AVTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 12. 7% yield, +764. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIGA: +764. 0%, AVTX: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNOV and SIGA and GILD and AVTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNOV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIGA is a small-cap deep-value stock; GILD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AVTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SIGA, GILD pay a dividend while MNOV, AVTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.