Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNR vs CHRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
MNR vs CHRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.22B | $7.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $5.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $92M | $-67M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | 16.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.16B | $1.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $190M |
MNR vs CHRD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
| Chord Energy Corpor… (CHRD) | 100 | 83.3 | -16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNR vs CHRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 14.1%
- Rev growth 12.8%, EPS growth -42.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 12.8% revenue growth vs CHRD's -7.1%
CHRD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs MNR's 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 18.6%, current ratio 1.06x
- Beta 0.13, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.8% revenue growth vs CHRD's -7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 8.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs CHRD's -1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs MNR's 0.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.1% yield, vs CHRD's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.6% vs MNR's +13.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs CHRD's -0.5%, ROIC 7.7% vs 1.6% |
MNR vs CHRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNR vs CHRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRD is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 4.5x MNR's $1.2B. MNR is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHRD's -1.3%. On growth, CHRD holds the edge at +37.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $5.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $556M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $92M | -$67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $157M | $522M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.0% | +16.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +37.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -47.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNR and CHRD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, MNR trades at a 94% valuation discount to CHRD's 186.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHRD's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNR's 6.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $9.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.08x | 186.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.12x | 7.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.10x | 5.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.02x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.37x | 11.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CHRD. CHRD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNR's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNR scores 5/9 vs CHRD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | -0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | -0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $190M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.61x | 3.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHRD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHRD five years ago would be worth $25,959 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,273 for MNR. Over the past 12 months, CHRD leads with a +58.6% total return vs MNR's +13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHRD at 4.5% vs MNR's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | +46.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.7% | +58.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.7% | +14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.7% | +159.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.7% | +541.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CHRD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHRD is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNR's 0.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHRD currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs MNR's 84.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.60 | $150.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.46 | $84.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 761K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
MNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNR as "Buy" and CHRD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.3% upside for MNR (target: $19) vs -0.9% for CHRD (target: $137). For income investors, MNR offers the higher dividend yield at 14.11% vs CHRD's 3.99%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $136.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.86 | $5.49 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% |
MNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHRD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
MNR vs CHRD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNR or CHRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the stronger pick with 12.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD). Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNR or CHRD?
On trailing P/E, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Chord Energy Corporation at 186. 1x. On forward P/E, Chord Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNR or CHRD?
Over the past 5 years, Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) delivered a total return of +159.
6%, compared to +2. 7% for Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHRD returned +541. 7% versus MNR's +2. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNR or CHRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
13β versus Mach Natural Resources LP's 0. 24β — meaning MNR is approximately 84% more volatile than CHRD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 58% for Mach Natural Resources LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNR or CHRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is pulling ahead at 12.
8% versus -7. 1% for Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mach Natural Resources LP grew EPS -42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -95. 4% for Chord Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHRD leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNR or CHRD?
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus 0. 9% for Chord Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNR leads at 23. 2% versus 4. 1% for CHRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNR leads at 28. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNR or CHRD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) trades at 7.
6x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for Mach Natural Resources LP — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNR: 44. 3% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNR or CHRD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the highest yield at 14. 1%, versus 4. 0% for Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD).
09Is MNR or CHRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
13), 4. 0% yield, +541. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHRD: +541. 7%, MNR: +2. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNR and CHRD?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHRD is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.