MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$2.22B
5Y Perf.-28.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MNR vs SM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SM
SM Energy Company
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$3.35B
5Y Perf.-27.8%
MNR vs SM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MNR | SM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.22B | $3.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $3.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $92M | $131M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 4.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.16B | $2.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $368M |
MNR vs SM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MNR
SM
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
| SM Energy Company (SM) | 100 | 72.2 | -27.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNR vs SM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Mach Natural Resources LP is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
The Defensive Pick
MNR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.24, yield 14.1%, current ratio 1.05x
- 7.7% margin vs SM's 3.4%
- 14.1% yield, vs SM's 2.7%
Best for: defensive
SM
SM Energy Company
The Income Pick
SM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth -15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.9%
- 132.6% 10Y total return vs MNR's 2.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SM | 18.1% revenue growth vs MNR's 12.8% |
| Value | SM | Lower P/E (4.4x vs 8.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | MNR | 7.7% margin vs SM's 3.4% |
| Stability / Safety | SM | Beta 0.16 vs MNR's 0.24, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MNR | 14.1% yield, vs SM's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SM | +41.1% vs MNR's +13.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNR | 2.7% ROA vs SM's 1.1%, ROIC 7.7% vs 8.9% |
MNR vs SM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
MNR vs SM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSMLAGGINGMNR
MNRMach Natural Resource…
2leads
SMSM Energy Company
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MNRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MNR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SM6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MNR5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 3.2x MNR's $1.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.7% (MNR) to 3.4% (SM). On growth, SM holds the edge at +76.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | SMSM Energy Company |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $556M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $92M | $131M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $157M | -$226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.0% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +76.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -2.1% |
MNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, SM trades at a 57% valuation discount to MNR's 12.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SM's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNR's 6.1x.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | SMSM Energy Company |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.08x | 5.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.12x | 4.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.10x | 2.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.02x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.37x | 5.84x |
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $2 for SM. SM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNR's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs MNR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | SMSM Energy Company |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $368M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.61x | 1.37x |
MNR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SM five years ago would be worth $17,892 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,273 for MNR. Over the past 12 months, SM leads with a +41.1% total return vs MNR's +13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SM at 5.9% vs MNR's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | SMSM Energy Company |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | +53.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.7% | +41.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.7% | +18.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.7% | +78.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.7% | +132.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | +5.9% |
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SM is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNR's 0.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SM currently trades 87.5% from its 52-week high vs MNR's 84.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | SMSM Energy Company |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.60 | $33.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.46 | $17.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +87.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 761K | 5.9M |
SM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNR and SM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNR as "Buy" and SM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.3% upside for MNR (target: $19) vs -0.3% for SM (target: $29). For income investors, MNR offers the higher dividend yield at 14.11% vs SM's 2.75%.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | SMSM Energy Company |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.1% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.86 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Evenly matched — MNR and SM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MNR leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallSM Energy Company (SM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MNR vs SM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNR or SM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SM Energy Company (SM) is the stronger pick with 18.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 8% for Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR). SM Energy Company (SM) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (4. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNR or SM?
On trailing P/E, SM Energy Company (SM) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Mach Natural Resources LP at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, SM Energy Company is actually cheaper at 4. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNR or SM?
Over the past 5 years, SM Energy Company (SM) delivered a total return of +78.
9%, compared to +2. 7% for Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SM returned +132. 6% versus MNR's +2. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNR or SM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SM Energy Company (SM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus Mach Natural Resources LP's 0. 24β — meaning MNR is approximately 47% more volatile than SM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SM Energy Company (SM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 58% for Mach Natural Resources LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNR or SM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SM Energy Company (SM) is pulling ahead at 18.
1% versus 12. 8% for Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SM Energy Company grew EPS -15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -42. 6% for Mach Natural Resources LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNR leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNR or SM?
SM Energy Company (SM) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
5% net margin versus 13. 1% for Mach Natural Resources LP — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SM leads at 26. 1% versus 23. 2% for MNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SM leads at 31. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNR or SM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SM Energy Company (SM) trades at 4.
4x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for Mach Natural Resources LP — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNR: 44. 3% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNR or SM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the highest yield at 14. 1%, versus 2. 7% for SM Energy Company (SM).
09Is MNR or SM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SM Energy Company (SM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 7% yield, +132. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SM: +132. 6%, MNR: +2. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNR and SM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MNR: 26.1% · SM: 76.2%)Net Margin>
%
(MNR: 7.7% · SM: 3.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MNR: 12.1x · SM: 5.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.