MNRO
Monro, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$523M
5Y Perf.-68.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MNRO vs PAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PAG
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Auto - Dealerships
Market Cap$11.29B
5Y Perf.+380.1%
MNRO vs PAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MNRO | PAG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $523M | $11.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $32.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $926M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 3.9% |
| Forward P/E | 32.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $529M | $8.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $65M |
MNRO vs PAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MNRO
PAG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monro, Inc. (MNRO) | 100 | 31.6 | -68.4% |
| Penske Automotive G… (PAG) | 100 | 480.1 | +380.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNRO vs PAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PAG leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Monro, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MNRO
Monro, Inc.
The Income Pick
MNRO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 6.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PAG's 3.0%
- +45.4% vs PAG's +14.2%
Best for: dividends and momentum
PAG
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
The Income Pick
PAG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth -2.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.6%
- 427.6% 10Y total return vs MNRO's -62.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PAG | -0.2% revenue growth vs MNRO's -6.4% |
| Value | PAG | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 32.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | PAG | 2.9% margin vs MNRO's -1.1% |
| Stability / Safety | PAG | Beta 0.66 vs MNRO's 1.50 |
| Dividends | MNRO | 6.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PAG's 3.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MNRO | +45.4% vs PAG's +14.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PAG | 5.2% ROA vs MNRO's -0.8%, ROIC 6.9% vs 2.5% |
MNRO vs PAG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
MNRO vs PAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPAGLAGGINGMNRO
MNROMonro, Inc.
1leads
PAGPenske Automotive Gro…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MNROMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MNRO4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PAG6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PAG5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
PAG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MNRO and PAG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAG is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.1B annually — 27.2x MNRO's $1.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (PAG) to -1.1% (MNRO). On growth, PAG holds the edge at +3.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | PAGPenske Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $32.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $926M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | $465M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +16.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +3.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +150.0% | -2.7% |
Evenly matched — MNRO and PAG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MNRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MNRO's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAG's 13.8x.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | PAGPenske Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $523M | $11.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $20.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.23x | 12.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.40x | 12.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.41x | 13.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.96x | 15.25x |
MNRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAG delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MNRO. MNRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAG's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAG scores 7/9 vs MNRO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | PAGPenske Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $509M | $8.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $65M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $529M | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.09x | 6.37x |
PAG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAG five years ago would be worth $20,467 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,236 for MNRO. Over the past 12 months, MNRO leads with a +45.4% total return vs PAG's +14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAG at 9.7% vs MNRO's -24.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | PAGPenske Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | +9.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.4% | +14.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.7% | +32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.6% | +104.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.4% | +427.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.9% | +9.7% |
PAG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAG is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNRO's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAG currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs MNRO's 72.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | PAGPenske Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.91 | $189.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.20 | $140.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.9% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 65.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 770K | 275K |
PAG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNRO and PAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNRO as "Hold" and PAG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 129.5% upside for MNRO (target: $40) vs 10.7% for PAG (target: $190). For income investors, MNRO offers the higher dividend yield at 6.43% vs PAG's 3.02%.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | PAGPenske Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $190.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.4% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.12 | $5.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.4% |
Evenly matched — MNRO and PAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PAG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MNRO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallPenske Automotive Group, In… (PAG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MNRO vs PAG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNRO or PAG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) is the stronger pick with -0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNRO or PAG?
On forward P/E, Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNRO or PAG?
Over the past 5 years, Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) delivered a total return of +104. 7%, compared to -67. 6% for Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAG returned +427. 6% versus MNRO's -62. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNRO or PAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Monro, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning MNRO is approximately 126% more volatile than PAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monro, Inc. (MNRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 158% for Penske Automotive Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNRO or PAG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) is pulling ahead at -0. 2% versus -6. 4% for Monro, Inc. (MNRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Penske Automotive Group, Inc. grew EPS -2. 5% year-over-year, compared to -119. 3% for Monro, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAG leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNRO or PAG?
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -0. 4% for Monro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAG leads at 4. 0% versus 3. 4% for MNRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNRO leads at 34. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNRO or PAG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 32. 4x for Monro, Inc. — 19. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNRO: 129. 5% to $40. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNRO or PAG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Monro, Inc. (MNRO) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 3. 0% for Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG).
09Is MNRO or PAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
(PAG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 3. 0% yield, +427. 6% 10Y return). Monro, Inc. (MNRO) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAG: +427. 6%, MNRO: -62. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNRO and PAG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNRO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PAG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MNRO: -4.0% · PAG: 3.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.