Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNY vs LC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
MNY vs LC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $61M | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 39.3% | 64.7% |
| Operating Margin | -20.4% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $736K | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $918M |
MNY vs LC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoneyHero Limited C… (MNY) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| LendingClub Corpora… (LC) | 100 | 321.6 | +221.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNY vs LC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.54
- Lower volatility, beta 1.54, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 2.49x
- Beta 1.54, current ratio 2.49x
LC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth 155.6%
- -27.7% 10Y total return vs MNY's -78.7%
- 15.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNY's -1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNY's -1.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.2% margin vs MNY's -35.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.54 vs LC's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.5% vs LC's +62.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs MNY's -31.6%, ROIC 17.3% vs -344.7% |
MNY vs LC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MNY vs LC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 19.3x MNY's $69M. LC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNY's -35.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $287M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.3% | +64.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.4% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -33.5% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -171.4% | +3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MNY leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.57x | 14.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LC delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-56 for MNY. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNY's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LC scores 6/9 vs MNY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -56.1% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.4% | +17.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -62.8% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | -$902M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $918M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $736,000 | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -568.32x | 0.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LC five years ago would be worth $11,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,127 for MNY. Over the past 12 months, MNY leads with a +92.5% total return vs LC's +62.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LC at 34.4% vs MNY's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.8% | -12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +92.5% | +62.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | +142.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | +15.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | -27.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.3% | +34.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNY and LC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNY is the less volatile stock with a 1.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LC's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LC currently trades 77.0% from its 52-week high vs MNY's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.40 | $21.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $9.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MNY vs LC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNY or LC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the stronger pick with 15.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (MNY). LendingClub Corporation (LC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LendingClub Corporation (LC) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MNY or LC?
Over the past 5 years, LendingClub Corporation (LC) delivered a total return of +15.
1%, compared to -78. 7% for MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (MNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LC returned -27. 7% versus MNY's -78. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MNY or LC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (MNY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
54β versus LendingClub Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning LC is approximately 53% more volatile than MNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MNY or LC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LendingClub Corporation (LC) is pulling ahead at 15.
0% versus -1. 4% for MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (MNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to 82. 5% for MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MNY or LC?
LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
2% net margin versus -47. 5% for MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LC leads at 25. 0% versus -50. 5% for MNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LC leads at 64. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MNY or LC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MNY or LC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MoneyHero Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (MNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNY: -78. 7%, LC: -27. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MNY and LC?
These companies operate in different sectors (MNY (Communication Services) and LC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MNY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.