Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MOD vs GTLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
MOD vs GTLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $14.22B | $9.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.87B | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 52.1x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $449M | $3.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $366M |
MOD vs GTLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modine Manufacturin… (MOD) | 100 | 5040.2 | +4940.2% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.4 | +428.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOD vs GTLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 13.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 25.2% 10Y total return vs GTLS's 7.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.51, Low D/E 48.9%, current ratio 1.78x
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- Beta 0.56, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.36x
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 52.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 52.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs MOD's 2.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +195.3% vs GTLS's +37.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 17.6% vs 7.4% |
MOD vs GTLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOD vs GTLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MOD and GTLS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS and MOD operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $2.9B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.4% (MOD) to 0.9% (GTLS). On growth, MOD holds the edge at +30.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $399M | $644M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $203M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.5% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GTLS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 78.8x trailing earnings, MOD trades at a 87% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTLS's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MOD's 40.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.2B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.6B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 78.84x | 628.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.06x | 16.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.41x | 14.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.50x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.83x | 2.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 109.97x | 48.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOD leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOD delivers a 8.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. MOD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOD scores 7/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | +1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.1% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $378M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $366M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $449M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.57x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOD five years ago would be worth $158,525 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,951 for GTLS. Over the past 12 months, MOD leads with a +195.3% total return vs GTLS's +37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOD at 136.8% vs GTLS's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +91.5% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +195.3% | +37.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1227.7% | +62.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1485.2% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2518.0% | +772.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +136.8% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOD's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs MOD's 93.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.51x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $287.30 | $208.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.48 | $140.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 950K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
GTLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MOD as "Buy" and GTLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -6.5% upside for GTLS (target: $194) vs -8.9% for MOD (target: $246). GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.60 | $193.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
GTLS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). MOD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MOD vs GTLS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOD or GTLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) is the stronger pick with 7.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) offers the better valuation at 78. 8x trailing P/E (52. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOD or GTLS?
On trailing P/E, Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) is the cheapest at 78.
8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOD or GTLS?
Over the past 5 years, Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) delivered a total return of +1485%, compared to +29.
5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOD returned +25. 2% versus GTLS's +772. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOD or GTLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Modine Manufacturing Company's 2. 51β — meaning MOD is approximately 351% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOD or GTLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) is pulling ahead at 7.
3% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Modine Manufacturing Company grew EPS 13. 2% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOD or GTLS?
Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus 11. 0% for MOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLS leads at 29. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOD or GTLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 52. 1x for Modine Manufacturing Company — 35. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTLS: -6. 5% to $193. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOD or GTLS?
In this comparison, GTLS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. MOD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MOD or GTLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, MOD: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOD and GTLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOD (Consumer Cyclical) and GTLS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.