Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MODD vs PODD vs TNDM vs NVCR vs MASI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
MODD vs PODD vs TNDM vs NVCR vs MASI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $8M | $11.26B | $1.27B | $1.92B | $9.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.90B | $1.03B | $674M | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $303M | $-95M | $-173M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.0% | 54.9% | 75.2% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.5% | -7.9% | -27.2% | 19.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.2x | — | — | 32.5x |
| Total Debt | $816K | $1.05B | $444M | $290M | $559M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $716M | $91M | $103M | $152M |
MODD vs PODD vs TNDM vs NVCR vs MASI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modular Medical, In… (MODD) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
| Insulet Corporation (PODD) | 100 | 60.6 | -39.4% |
| Tandem Diabetes Car… (TNDM) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| Masimo Corporation (MASI) | 100 | 113.4 | +13.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MODD vs PODD vs TNDM vs NVCR vs MASI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MODD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.41, Low D/E 4.8%, current ratio 10.69x
- Beta 1.41, current ratio 10.69x
PODD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth -39.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 439.0% 10Y total return vs MASI's 282.9%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs MODD's -47.3%
- Lower P/E (25.2x vs 32.5x)
TNDM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MASI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.63
- Beta 0.63 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
- +18.9% vs MODD's -87.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs MODD's -47.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.2x vs 32.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs MODD's -87.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs MODD's -190.8%, ROIC 20.1% vs -344.6% |
MODD vs PODD vs TNDM vs NVCR vs MASI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MODD vs PODD vs TNDM vs NVCR vs MASI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PODD leads in 3 of 6 categories
MASI leads 2 • MODD leads 0 • TNDM leads 0 • NVCR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PODD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PODD and MODD operate at a comparable scale, with $2.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. PODD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, PODD holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.9B | $1.0B | $674M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | $582M | -$68M | -$165M | $340M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $303M | -$95M | -$173M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $416M | -$4M | -$48M | $211M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +71.0% | +54.9% | +75.2% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.5% | -7.9% | -27.2% | +19.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.4% | -9.2% | -25.7% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +14.3% | -0.4% | -7.1% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +33.9% | +5.5% | +12.3% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +160.0% | +84.8% | -100.0% | +134.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PODD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PODD's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MASI's 27.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $11.3B | $1.3B | $1.9B | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $11.6B | $1.6B | $2.1B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | 46.09x | -6.08x | -13.80x | -63.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.23x | — | — | 32.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.76x | — | — | 27.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.16x | 1.25x | 2.92x | 6.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 7.61x | 8.01x | 5.51x | 13.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.81x | — | — | 47.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PODD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PODD delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MODD. MODD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNDM's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PODD scores 7/9 vs TNDM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +21.4% | -68.3% | -50.8% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -190.8% | +9.6% | -10.0% | -16.5% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.4% | +20.1% | -10.0% | -16.4% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -127.7% | +18.7% | -11.5% | -28.9% | +18.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.69x | 2.86x | 0.85x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $335M | $354M | $187M | $407M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $716M | $91M | $103M | $152M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $816,000 | $1.1B | $444M | $290M | $559M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.39x | -15.99x | -96.80x | 12.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MASI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MASI five years ago would be worth $7,963 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $355 for MODD. Over the past 12 months, MASI leads with a +18.9% total return vs MODD's -87.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MASI at -1.7% vs MODD's -57.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.8% | -43.3% | -14.3% | +28.3% | +40.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.2% | -39.3% | -17.0% | +1.1% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.5% | -49.7% | -44.8% | -75.7% | -4.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | -31.5% | -78.0% | -91.3% | -20.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | +439.0% | -75.4% | +30.3% | +282.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.8% | -20.5% | -18.0% | -37.6% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MASI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MASI is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MASI currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs MODD's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.41x | 0.68x | 1.45x | 2.20x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.00 | $354.88 | $29.65 | $20.06 | $179.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $148.31 | $9.98 | $9.82 | $125.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.0% | +45.2% | +62.3% | +83.9% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.7 | 22.4 | 39.1 | 69.8 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 1.1M | 1.8M | 1.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MODD as "Buy", PODD as "Buy", TNDM as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MASI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.3% upside for PODD (target: $339) vs 5.0% for MASI (target: $188).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $339.00 | $31.62 | $33.50 | $187.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 50 | 39 | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
PODD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MASI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MODD vs PODD vs TNDM vs NVCR vs MASI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger pick with 30.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 1% for Masimo Corporation (MASI). Insulet Corporation (PODD) offers the better valuation at 46. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Modular Medical, Inc. (MODD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI?
On forward P/E, Insulet Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI?
Over the past 5 years, Masimo Corporation (MASI) delivered a total return of -20.
4%, compared to -96. 5% for Modular Medical, Inc. (MODD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PODD returned +439. 0% versus MODD's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Masimo Corporation (MASI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 251% more volatile than MASI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Modular Medical, Inc. (MODD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insulet Corporation (PODD) is pulling ahead at 30.
7% versus -27. 1% for Masimo Corporation (MASI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masimo Corporation grew EPS 51. 0% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PODD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI?
Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
1% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MASI leads at 20. 5% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Insulet Corporation (PODD) trades at 25.
2x forward P/E versus 32. 5x for Masimo Corporation — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PODD: 111. 3% to $339. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MODD or PODD or TNDM or NVCR or MASI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), +439. 0% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PODD: +439. 0%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MODD and PODD and TNDM and NVCR and MASI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MODD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PODD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TNDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MASI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.