Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MODG vs PLNT vs PTON vs NKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
MODG vs PLNT vs PTON vs NKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure | Leisure | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $2.32B | $3.52B | $2.32B | $52.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.06B | $1.38B | $2.45B | $46.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.50B | $229M | $23M | $2.52B |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | 54.2% | 52.0% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | -31.0% | 29.6% | 5.5% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.0x | 36.7x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.14B | $443M | $1.98B | $11.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $445M | $346M | $1.04B | $7.46B |
MODG vs PLNT vs PTON vs NKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topgolf Callaway Br… (MODG) | 100 | 82.2 | -17.8% |
| Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) | 100 | 140.9 | +40.9% |
| Peloton Interactive… (PTON) | 100 | 13.2 | -86.8% |
| NIKE, Inc. (NKE) | 100 | 62.7 | -37.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MODG vs PLNT vs PTON vs NKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MODG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +80.6% vs PLNT's -56.7%
PLNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 31.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- 203.6% 10Y total return vs MODG's 37.6%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs NKE's -9.8%
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 29.6x)
PTON lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NKE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 83.4%, current ratio 2.21x
- Beta 1.17, yield 3.5%, current ratio 2.21x
- 3.5% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs PLNT's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs NKE's -9.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 29.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs MODG's -37.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs MODG's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs PLNT's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.6% vs PLNT's -56.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs MODG's -19.9%, ROIC 35.2% vs -13.8% |
MODG vs PLNT vs PTON vs NKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MODG vs PLNT vs PTON vs NKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLNT leads in 2 of 6 categories
NKE leads 1 • MODG leads 0 • PTON leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLNT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $46.5B annually — 33.6x PLNT's $1.4B. PLNT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MODG's -37.1%. On growth, PLNT holds the edge at +21.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $1.4B | $2.4B | $46.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$989M | $568M | $156M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.5B | $229M | $23M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | $267M | $401M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | +54.2% | +52.0% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.0% | +29.6% | +5.5% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.1% | +16.5% | +0.9% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +19.3% | +16.4% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | +21.9% | +1.1% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | +30.0% | +150.0% | -30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MODG and PLNT and PTON each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, PLNT trades at a 18% valuation discount to NKE's 20.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PLNT's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTON's 60.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $3.5B | $2.3B | $52.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $3.6B | $3.3B | $56.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.60x | 16.80x | -18.87x | 20.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.03x | 36.69x | 29.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.57x | 60.85x | 12.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 2.66x | 0.93x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | — | — | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.73x | 13.82x | 7.16x | 16.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLNT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NKE delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MODG. NKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.83x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MODG's 1.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLNT scores 9/9 vs NKE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.8% | — | — | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.9% | +7.4% | +1.1% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.8% | +35.2% | -3.9% | +16.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.8% | +14.2% | -2.6% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.72x | — | — | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $97M | $937M | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $445M | $346M | $1.0B | $7.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $443M | $2.0B | $11.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.38x | 6.73x | 1.52x | 10.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MODG and PLNT and PTON each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLNT five years ago would be worth $5,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $675 for PTON. Over the past 12 months, MODG leads with a +80.6% total return vs PLNT's -56.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTON at -11.2% vs NKE's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.4% | -59.9% | -7.5% | -29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.6% | -56.7% | -18.9% | -21.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.4% | -38.9% | -30.0% | -61.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.6% | -42.9% | -93.2% | -62.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.6% | +203.6% | -78.0% | -5.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.8% | -15.1% | -11.2% | -27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MODG and PLNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MODG's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MODG currently trades 75.6% from its 52-week high vs PLNT's 38.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.93x | 0.41x | 1.94x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.65 | $114.47 | $9.20 | $80.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.87 | $37.03 | $3.65 | $42.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +38.4% | +61.5% | +55.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 32.8 | 57.4 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.2M | 1.8M | 13.1M | 20.8M |
Analyst Outlook
NKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MODG as "Buy", PLNT as "Buy", PTON as "Buy", NKE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.8% upside for PLNT (target: $79) vs 15.2% for MODG (target: $15). NKE is the only dividend payer here at 3.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $79.15 | $7.20 | $68.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 27 | 40 | 71 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 | — | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +14.2% | 0.0% | +5.6% |
PLNT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NKE leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
MODG vs PLNT vs PTON vs NKE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 8% for NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE?
On trailing P/E, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus NIKE, Inc. at 20. 6x. On forward P/E, Planet Fitness, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE?
Over the past 5 years, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) delivered a total return of -42. 9%, compared to -93. 2% for Peloton Interactive, Inc. (PTON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLNT returned +215. 8% versus PTON's -77. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Peloton Interactive, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning PTON is approximately 373% more volatile than PLNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NIKE, Inc. (NKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 83% versus 172% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -9. 8% for NIKE, Inc. (NKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peloton Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 80. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLNT leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE?
Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus -34. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLNT leads at 29. 8% versus -29. 7% for MODG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLNT leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 7x for Peloton Interactive, Inc. — 22. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLNT: 79. 8% to $79. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE?
In this comparison, NKE (3.
5% yield) pays a dividend. MODG, PLNT, PTON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MODG or PLNT or PTON or NKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +215. 8% 10Y return). Peloton Interactive, Inc. (PTON) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLNT: +215. 8%, PTON: -77. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MODG and PLNT and PTON and NKE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MODG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLNT is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. NKE pays a dividend while MODG, PLNT, PTON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.