Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NFLX | 15.9% revenue growth vs MOMO's -12.0% |
| Value | MOMO | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 26.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | NFLX | 24.3% net margin vs MOMO's 8.2% |
| Stability / Safety | MOMO | Beta 0.46 vs NFLX's 0.78, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MOMO | 8.5% yield; NFLX pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MOMO | -12.0% vs NFLX's -16.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NFLX | 19.8% ROA vs MOMO's 5.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 11.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Hello Group operates China's leading mobile social and entertainment platforms — primarily Momo and Tantan — that connect users through location-based matching, live streaming, and dating services. It generates revenue mainly from virtual gifting in live streaming (where viewers buy digital gifts for creators), premium subscriptions for enhanced features, and mobile marketing services. The company's competitive moat lies in its massive user network effects within China's social entertainment ecosystem and its deep understanding of local user preferences for interactive, video-based social experiences.
Netflix is a global streaming entertainment service that offers original and licensed TV shows, movies, and documentaries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees — with three pricing tiers — and earns additional income from licensing its original content to other platforms. Its key advantage is its massive scale and data-driven content creation, which allows it to invest billions in programming that attracts and retains subscribers worldwide.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MOMO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 4.3x MOMO's $10.5B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOMO's 8.2%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.5B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $854M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -139.6% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 75% valuation discount to NFLX's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 10.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 11.8x.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $350.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $355.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.12x | 32.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.14x | 26.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.99x | 11.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.46x | 7.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 13.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.40x | 37.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for MOMO. MOMO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs MOMO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.8% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.2% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.7% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $459M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.1B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.22x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $15,346 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,960 for MOMO. Over the past 12 months, MOMO leads with a -12.0% total return vs NFLX's -16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 36.8% vs MOMO's -3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.0% | -16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | +156.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.4% | +53.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.5% | +772.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.0% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFLX's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 71.8% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.22 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.12 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.8% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 842K | 41.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MOMO as "Buy" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.8% upside for NFLX (target: $117) vs 22.4% for MOMO (target: $8). MOMO is the only dividend payer here at 8.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.10 | $117.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.83 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | +2.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 23.31 | -76.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 218.25 | +118.2% |
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) returned +53% over 5 years vs Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)'s -40%. A $10,000 investment in NFLX 5 years ago would be worth $15,346 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | $3.8B | $10.6B | +175.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | $8.8B | $45.2B | +411.7% |
Netflix, Inc.'s revenue grew from $8.8B (2016) to $45.2B (2025) — a 19.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 26.3% | 9.8% | -62.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 2.1% | 24.3% | +1049.7% |
Netflix, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to 24% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 2.4 | 1.4 | -41.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 153.6 | 37.1 | -75.8% |
Hello Group Inc. has traded in a 1x–3x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x. Netflix, Inc. has traded in a 30x–154x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~33x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 5 | 5.58 | +11.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 0.04 | 2.53 | +5783.7% |
Netflix, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.04 (2016) to $2.53 (2025) — a 57% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Hello Group Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021). Netflix, Inc. generated $9B FCF in 2025 (+7269% vs 2021).
MOMO vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOMO or NFLX a better buy right now?
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 8.1x trailing P/E (1.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOMO or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the cheapest at 8.1x versus Netflix, Inc. at 32.7x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOMO or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) delivered a total return of +53.5%, compared to -40.4% for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +772.4% versus MOMO's -9.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOMO or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.46β versus Netflix, Inc.'s 0.78β — meaning NFLX is approximately 69% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MOMO or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24.3% net margin versus 9.8% for Hello Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 24.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29.5% versus 14.5% for MOMO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MOMO or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) trades at 1.1x forward P/E versus 26.4x for Netflix, Inc. — 25.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 41.8% to $117.25.
07Which pays a better dividend — MOMO or NFLX?
In this comparison, MOMO (8.5% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MOMO or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.46), 8.5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9.5%, NFLX: +772.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MOMO and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. MOMO pays a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 5%
- Dividend Yield > 3.3%