Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs NXE vs URG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.91B
5Y Perf.+628.7%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.

Uranium

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$5.83B
5Y Perf.+1456.3%
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.45B
5Y Perf.+90.8%
NXE
NexGen Energy Ltd.

Uranium

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$8.43B
5Y Perf.+898.4%
URG
Ur-Energy Inc.

Uranium

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$696M
5Y Perf.+264.4%

MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs NXE vs URG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MP logoMP
UUUU logoUUUU
LAC logoLAC
NXE logoNXE
URG logoURG
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsUraniumIndustrial MaterialsUraniumUranium
Market Cap$12.91B$5.83B$1.45B$8.43B$696M
Revenue (TTM)$275M$85M$0.00$0.00$27M
Net Income (TTM)$-86M$-70M$-241M$-310M$-75M
Gross Margin5.8%37.3%-65.2%
Operating Margin-53.0%-108.3%-255.0%
Forward P/E288.3x
Total Debt$1.04B$676M$23M$586M$68M
Cash & Equiv.$1.17B$65M$594M$802M$124M

MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs NXE vs URGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MP
UUUU
LAC
NXE
URG
StockJun 20May 26Return
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100728.7+628.7%
Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU)1001556.3+1456.3%
Lithium Americas Co… (LAC)100190.8+90.8%
NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE)100998.4+898.4%
Ur-Energy Inc. (URG)100364.4+264.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs NXE vs URG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MP leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Energy Fuels Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. LAC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Income Pick

MP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.40
  • Rev growth 35.1%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -19.5%
  • Beta 1.40, current ratio 7.24x
  • 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

UUUU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs MP's 6.3%
  • +409.8% vs LAC's +98.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
The Defensive Pick

LAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
  • 1.4% margin vs URG's -275.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
NXE
NexGen Energy Ltd.
The Energy Pick

NXE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
URG
Ur-Energy Inc.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, URG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMP logoMP35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
Quality / MarginsLAC logoLAC1.4% margin vs URG's -275.3%
Stability / SafetyMP logoMPBeta 1.40 vs UUUU's 1.85, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)UUUU logoUUUU+409.8% vs LAC's +98.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MP logoMP-2.7% ROA vs URG's -37.6%, ROIC -4.7% vs -130.4%

MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs NXE vs URG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M
UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LACLithium Americas Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

NXENexGen Energy Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

URGUr-Energy Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs NXE vs URG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPLAGGINGURG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MP and UUUU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MP and NXE operate at a comparable scale, with $275M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -31.2% (MP) to -2.8% (URG). On growth, UUUU holds the edge at +112.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …NXE logoNXENexGen Energy Ltd.URG logoURGUr-Energy Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$275M$85M$0$0$27M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$56M-$94M-$32M-$87M-$63M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$86M-$70M-$241M-$310M-$75M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$328M-$87M-$648M-$183M-$67M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+5.8%+37.3%-65.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-53.0%-108.3%-2.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-31.2%-82.7%-2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-119.1%-102.5%-2.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+70.0%+112.1%-53.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+133.8%+69.2%-21.4%+36.4%+25.2%
Evenly matched — MP and UUUU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MP and LAC and URG each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …NXE logoNXENexGen Energy Ltd.URG logoURGUr-Energy Inc.
Market CapShares × price$12.9B$5.8B$1.5B$8.4B$696M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12.8B$6.4B$881M$8.3B$640M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-145.30x-63.51x-28.52x-33.65x-9.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.288.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue46.86x88.49x25.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.17x8.01x1.27x5.62x8.80x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — MP and LAC and URG each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MP delivers a -5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-76 for URG. LAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UUUU's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MP scores 4/9 vs URG's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …NXE logoNXENexGen Energy Ltd.URG logoURGUr-Energy Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.0%-10.2%-26.9%-25.4%-76.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.7%-6.5%-16.6%-17.3%-37.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.7%-8.5%-7.1%-4.9%-130.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.2%-10.5%-3.9%-5.9%-33.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942232
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x0.99x0.02x0.32x0.88x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$123M$611M-$571M-$215M-$56M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.2B$65M$594M$802M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$676M$23M$586M$68M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.74x-5.43x-39.41x
MP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UUUU five years ago would be worth $39,363 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,851 for LAC. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +409.8% total return vs LAC's +98.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UUUU at 57.2% vs LAC's -22.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …NXE logoNXENexGen Energy Ltd.URG logoURGUr-Energy Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+32.2%+40.9%+25.6%+25.7%+20.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+194.2%+409.8%+98.3%+139.0%+158.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+238.1%+288.4%-53.0%+227.7%+95.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+147.9%+293.6%-21.5%+180.0%+41.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+626.5%+983.0%+256.5%+569.1%+256.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+50.1%+57.2%-22.3%+48.5%+25.1%
UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MP and NXE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UUUU's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NXE currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs LAC's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …NXE logoNXENexGen Energy Ltd.URG logoURGUr-Energy Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x1.85x1.42x1.48x1.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$100.25$27.90$10.52$13.96$2.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.64$4.20$2.47$5.16$0.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.5%+84.2%+56.9%+92.3%+78.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.653.263.349.457.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.6M9.8M9.0M6.6M7.8M
Evenly matched — MP and NXE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MP as "Buy", UUUU as "Buy", LAC as "Hold", NXE as "Buy", URG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.3% upside for URG (target: $2) vs 2.5% for UUUU (target: $24).

MetricMP logoMPMP Materials Corp.UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.LAC logoLACLithium Americas …NXE logoNXENexGen Energy Ltd.URG logoURGUr-Energy Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$78.25$24.08$7.00$2.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts11815410
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). UUUU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallMP Materials Corp. (MP)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs NXE vs URG: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MP or UUUU or LAC or NXE or URG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for Ur-Energy Inc. (URG). Analysts rate MP Materials Corp. (MP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — MP or UUUU or LAC or NXE or URG?

Over the past 5 years, Energy Fuels Inc.

(UUUU) delivered a total return of +293. 6%, compared to -21. 5% for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UUUU returned +983. 0% versus URG's +256. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — MP or UUUU or LAC or NXE or URG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Energy Fuels Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning UUUU is approximately 32% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 99% for Energy Fuels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — MP or UUUU or LAC or NXE or URG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -19. 3% for Ur-Energy Inc. (URG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MP Materials Corp. grew EPS 12. 3% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, URG leads at 1027% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — MP or UUUU or LAC or NXE or URG?

Lithium Americas Corp.

(LAC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -275. 3% for Ur-Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAC leads at 0. 0% versus -255. 0% for URG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UUUU leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is MP or UUUU or LAC or NXE or URG more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for URG: 24.

3% to $2. 30.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MP or UUUU or LAC or NXE or URG?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is MP or UUUU or LAC or NXE or URG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+626. 5% 10Y return). Ur-Energy Inc. (URG) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MP: +626. 5%, URG: +256. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MP and UUUU and LAC and NXE and URG?

These companies operate in different sectors (MP (Basic Materials) and UUUU (Energy) and LAC (Basic Materials) and NXE (Energy) and URG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UUUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UUUU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 56%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NXE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

URG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MP and UUUU and LAC and NXE and URG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MP: 70.0% · UUUU: 112.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.