Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MPAA vs ORLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
MPAA vs ORLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $223M | $79.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $771M | $18.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $2.60B |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 29.2x |
| Total Debt | $201M | $8.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $194M |
MPAA vs ORLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 73.5 | -26.5% |
| O'Reilly Automotive… (ORLY) | 100 | 340.7 | +240.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPAA vs ORLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPAA is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (15.5x vs 29.2x)
- +28.0% vs ORLY's +2.5%
ORLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.14
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 9.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
- 434.6% 10Y total return vs MPAA's -62.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs MPAA's 5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.5x vs 29.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs MPAA's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs MPAA's 0.99 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.0% vs ORLY's +2.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs MPAA's 0.2%, ROIC 37.2% vs 6.2% |
MPAA vs ORLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPAA vs ORLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORLY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.2B annually — 23.6x MPAA's $771M. ORLY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPAA's 0.3%. On growth, ORLY holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $771M | $18.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.2% | +15.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MPAA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MPAA's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ORLY's 22.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $79.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $415M | $87.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.74x | 31.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.49x | 29.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.25x | 22.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 4.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.46x | 49.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORLY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPAA scores 7/9 vs ORLY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +37.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +48.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $192M | $8.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $201M | $8.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 14.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MPAA and ORLY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORLY five years ago would be worth $25,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,962 for MPAA. Over the past 12 months, MPAA leads with a +28.0% total return vs ORLY's +2.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 35.1% vs ORLY's 14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.0% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.0% | +2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.7% | +50.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | +153.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.4% | +434.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.1% | +14.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ORLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ORLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPAA's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORLY currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs MPAA's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.12 | $108.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.07 | $86.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MPAA as "Buy" and ORLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.1% upside for MPAA (target: $20) vs 16.9% for ORLY (target: $111).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $110.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +2.6% |
ORLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MPAA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MPAA vs ORLY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPAA or ORLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY) offers the better valuation at 31. 9x trailing P/E (29. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPAA or ORLY?
On forward P/E, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPAA or ORLY?
Over the past 5 years, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) delivered a total return of +153. 4%, compared to -50. 4% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORLY returned +434. 6% versus MPAA's -62. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPAA or ORLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning MPAA is approximately 592% more volatile than ORLY relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MPAA or ORLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus 5. 5% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to 9. 6% for O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORLY leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPAA or ORLY?
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus -2. 6% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORLY leads at 19. 5% versus 5. 3% for MPAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORLY leads at 51. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPAA or ORLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPAA: 72. 1% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPAA or ORLY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MPAA or ORLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), +434. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORLY: +434. 6%, MPAA: -62. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPAA and ORLY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.