Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MPB vs FXNC vs CZWI vs FUNC vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
MPB vs FXNC vs CZWI vs FUNC vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $868M | $273M | $207M | $272M | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $115M | $90M | $120M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $18M | $14M | $25M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 74.7% | 54.7% | 70.3% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 19.0% | 7.0% | 27.2% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 12.8x | 11.8x | 9.7x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $43M | $52M | $115M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $161M | $119M | $132M | $599M |
MPB vs FXNC vs CZWI vs FUNC vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB) | 100 | 185.9 | +85.9% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPB vs FXNC vs CZWI vs FUNC vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- NIM 3.6% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs MPB's 0.72
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 361.3% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 258.5%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.26 vs FXNC's 8.59
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 9.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.74
- 22.9% margin vs FXNC's 15.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 9.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.74 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs FXNC's 15.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs MPB's 0.72 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0% |
MPB vs FXNC vs CZWI vs FUNC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPB vs FXNC vs CZWI vs FUNC vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories
FXNC leads 1 • FUNC leads 1 • MPB leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 129.4x CZWI's $90M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FXNC's 15.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $115M | $90M | $120M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $25M | $9M | $35M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $18M | $14M | $25M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $21M | $11M | $16M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +74.7% | +54.7% | +70.3% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +19.0% | +7.0% | +27.2% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +15.4% | +16.0% | +20.5% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +18.2% | +12.4% | +13.1% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.3% | +7.1% | +63.0% | +20.2% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs FXNC's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $868M | $273M | $207M | $272M | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $881M | $155M | $140M | $255M | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.44x | 15.40x | 14.70x | 11.11x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.81x | 12.82x | 11.79x | 9.66x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 10.32x | 2.90x | 0.85x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 7.05x | 15.69x | 7.85x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 2.43x | 2.29x | 2.28x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.46x | 1.11x | 1.34x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.28x | 12.99x | 19.90x | 17.67x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +10.0% | +7.8% | +12.6% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +7.7% | +2.0% | +7.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +9.9% | +0.6% | +9.8% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.56x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$118M | -$67M | -$17M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $161M | $119M | $132M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $43M | $52M | $115M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.57x | 0.84x | 0.16x | 0.99x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +24.4% | +24.3% | +14.3% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +57.8% | +52.1% | +44.4% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | +103.7% | +153.7% | +192.2% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +71.0% | +69.0% | +141.9% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | +258.5% | +149.0% | +361.3% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +26.8% | +36.4% | +43.0% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FXNC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPB's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.52x | 0.50x | 0.67x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.22 | $30.51 | $22.62 | $42.35 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.02 | $18.31 | $12.83 | $28.00 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +99.0% | +94.9% | +98.9% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 67.0 | 51.2 | 71.6 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 79K | 41K | 13K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FXNC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $21.00 | — | $25.00 | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +2.0% | +1.7% | +2.2% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $0.61 | $0.37 | $0.92 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.1% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +7.0% |
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FXNC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
MPB vs FXNC vs CZWI vs FUNC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +361. 3% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning MPB is approximately 45% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 56% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
6% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 27. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for First National Corporation — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is MPB or FXNC or CZWI or FUNC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 2. 0% yield, +258. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +258. 5%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPB and FXNC and CZWI and FUNC and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.