Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MPB logo
MPB
NBTB logo
NBTB
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$868M
5Y Perf.+85.9%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPB logoMPB
NBTB logoNBTB
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$868M$2.52B$355.61B$896.00B$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$348M$902M$49.28B$280.33B$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$56M$169M$13.70B$57.05B$2.67B
Gross Margin63.6%73.6%61.7%60.0%37.6%
Operating Margin20.5%24.3%29.3%25.9%17.9%
Forward P/E10.8x11.5x25.3x14.4x6.2x
Total Debt$59M$327M$45.49B$942.38B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$47M$185M$10.27B$343.34B$599M

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPB
NBTB
KO
JPM
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB)100185.9+85.9%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MPB and NBTB also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MPB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.

  • NIM 3.2% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • +31.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: bank quality
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs MPB's 16.2%
  • 13.1% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
  • PEG 0.26 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MPB's 16.2%
Stability / SafetyFIS logoFISBeta 0.61 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)MPB logoMPB+31.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8%

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MPBMid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
36.4%$5M
Debit Card
27.1%$4M
Mortgage Banking
19.4%$3M
Deposit Account
17.1%$2M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 805.0x MPB's $348M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPB's 16.2%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$348M$902M$49.3B$280.3B$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$241M$15.5B$81.4B$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$56M$169M$13.7B$57.0B$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$31M$225M$12.6B$100.9B$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.6%+73.6%+61.7%+60.0%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.5%+24.3%+29.3%+25.9%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.2%+18.8%+27.8%+20.4%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.0%+24.9%+25.5%+36.0%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%+39.5%+18.2%+16.0%+30.6%
Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.4x trailing earnings, MPB trades at a 74% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$868M$2.5B$355.6B$896.0B$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$881M$2.7B$390.8B$1.50T$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.44x14.47x27.18x16.00x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.81x11.54x25.27x14.40x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.06x2.43x0.90x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x11.03x26.39x18.36x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.66x2.90x7.42x3.20x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.97x1.29x10.40x2.47x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.28x11.49x67.15x8.88x7.21x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+9.5%+41.1%+15.9%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.1%+13.1%+1.3%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+7.9%+15.8%+4.5%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.8%+2.4%+17.3%+8.9%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.17x1.33x2.60x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M$142M$35.2B$599.0B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$185M$10.3B$343.3B$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$59M$327M$45.5B$942.4B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.57x1.05x10.70x0.74x21.16x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MPB leads with a +31.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+17.6%+20.3%-0.5%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+18.3%+17.2%+21.8%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.2%+48.5%+47.0%+138.2%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.8%+44.4%+65.6%+118.2%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+164.5%+108.5%+121.1%+465.8%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.3%+14.1%+13.7%+33.6%-6.8%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.76x-0.20x0.94x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.22$48.27$84.04$337.25$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.02$39.20$65.35$262.71$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.3%+99.8%+98.3%+95.1%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.963.160.659.130.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded142K266K12.7M7.0M5.6M
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$46.00$86.13$339.75$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts210486137
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+3.0%+2.5%+1.9%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11356151
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$1.43$2.04$5.95$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+0.4%+0.2%+3.9%+7.0%
Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

(MPB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is MPB or NBTB or KO or JPM or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MPB and NBTB and KO and JPM and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.