Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MPB logo
MPB
NBTB logo
NBTB
KO logo
KO
TRMK logo
TRMK
CZWI logo
CZWI
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs TRMK vs CZWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$868M
5Y Perf.+85.9%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.70B
5Y Perf.+87.2%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs TRMK vs CZWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPB logoMPB
NBTB logoNBTB
KO logoKO
TRMK logoTRMK
CZWI logoCZWI
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$868M$2.52B$355.61B$2.70B$207M
Revenue (TTM)$348M$902M$49.28B$1.16B$90M
Net Income (TTM)$56M$169M$13.70B$224M$14M
Gross Margin63.6%73.6%61.7%64.7%54.7%
Operating Margin20.5%24.3%29.3%24.2%7.0%
Forward P/E10.8x11.5x25.3x11.8x11.8x
Total Debt$59M$327M$45.49B$1.12B$52M
Cash & Equiv.$47M$185M$10.27B$668M$119M

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs TRMK vs CZWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPB
NBTB
KO
TRMK
CZWI
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB)100185.9+85.9%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK)100187.2+87.2%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs TRMK vs CZWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO and CZWI are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. MPB, NBTB, and TRMK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MPB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x)
Best for: value
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
  • 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
  • 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
The Banking Pick

TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.

  • PEG 1.46 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • NIM 3.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
  • 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: valuation efficiency and bank quality
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 149.0% 10Y total return vs MPB's 164.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.50 vs TRMK's 0.82, lower leverage
  • +52.1% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTRMK logoTRMK34.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueMPB logoMPBLower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.50 vs TRMK's 0.82, lower leverage
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+52.1% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs TRMK vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MPBMid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
36.4%$5M
Debit Card
27.1%$4M
Mortgage Banking
19.4%$3M
Deposit Account
17.1%$2M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
TRMKTrustmark Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs TRMK vs CZWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 547.2x CZWI's $90M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$348M$902M$49.3B$1.2B$90M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$241M$15.5B$323M$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$56M$169M$13.7B$224M$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$31M$225M$12.6B$230M$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.6%+73.6%+61.7%+64.7%+54.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.5%+24.3%+29.3%+24.2%+7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.2%+18.8%+27.8%+19.3%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.0%+24.9%+25.5%+19.8%+12.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%+39.5%+18.2%+5.4%+63.0%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TRMK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 54% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.54x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Market CapShares × price$868M$2.5B$355.6B$2.7B$207M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$881M$2.7B$390.8B$3.2B$140M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.44x14.47x27.18x12.41x14.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.81x11.54x25.27x11.75x11.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.06x2.43x1.54x2.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x11.03x26.39x9.67x15.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.66x2.90x7.42x2.41x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.97x1.29x10.40x1.31x1.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.28x11.49x67.15x11.65x19.90x
TRMK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+9.5%+41.1%+10.8%+7.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.1%+13.1%+1.2%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+7.9%+15.8%+7.1%+2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.8%+2.4%+17.3%+3.2%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.17x1.33x0.53x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M$142M$35.2B$448M-$67M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$185M$10.3B$668M$119M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$59M$327M$45.5B$1.1B$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.57x1.05x10.70x0.75x0.16x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,577 for MPB. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+17.6%+20.3%+18.7%+24.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+18.3%+17.2%+35.5%+52.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.2%+48.5%+47.0%+115.6%+153.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.8%+44.4%+65.6%+56.8%+69.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+164.5%+108.5%+121.1%+127.3%+149.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.3%+14.1%+13.7%+29.2%+36.4%
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMK's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.76x-0.20x0.82x0.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.22$48.27$84.04$46.03$22.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.02$39.20$65.35$33.39$12.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.3%+99.8%+98.3%+99.7%+94.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.963.160.660.151.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded142K266K12.7M330K41K
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", KO as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs CZWI's 1.73%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$46.00$86.13$45.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts2104892
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+3.0%+2.5%+2.1%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1135616
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$1.43$2.04$0.97$0.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+0.4%+0.2%+3.0%+3.0%
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TRMK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPB vs NBTB vs KO vs TRMK vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI?

On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.

4x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 46x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +35. 8% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPB returned +164. 5% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Trustmark Corporation's 0. 82β — meaning TRMK is approximately -512% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.

8% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 46x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is MPB or NBTB or KO or TRMK or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, TRMK: +127. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MPB and NBTB and KO and TRMK and CZWI?

These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and TRMK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.