Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MPB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MPB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $868M | $2.52B | $2.70B | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $902M | $1.16B | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $169M | $224M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 73.6% | 64.7% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 24.3% | 24.2% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 11.5x | 11.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $327M | $1.12B | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $185M | $668M | $119M |
MPB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB) | 100 | 185.9 | +85.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 187.2 | +87.2% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 1.46 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 3.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 149.0% 10Y total return vs MPB's 164.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs TRMK's 0.82, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs TRMK's 0.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
MPB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MPB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRMK leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • MPB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 12.9x CZWI's $90M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.3% (TRMK) to 16.0% (CZWI).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $902M | $1.2B | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $241M | $323M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $169M | $224M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $225M | $230M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +73.6% | +64.7% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +24.3% | +24.2% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +18.8% | +19.3% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +24.9% | +19.8% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.3% | +39.5% | +5.4% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 16% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.54x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $868M | $2.5B | $2.7B | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $881M | $2.7B | $3.2B | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.44x | 14.47x | 12.41x | 14.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.81x | 11.54x | 11.75x | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.06x | 1.54x | 2.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 11.03x | 9.67x | 15.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 2.90x | 2.41x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.29x | 1.31x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.28x | 11.49x | 11.65x | 19.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRMK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +9.5% | +10.8% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +7.9% | +7.1% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +2.4% | +3.2% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.17x | 0.53x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $142M | $448M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $185M | $668M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $327M | $1.1B | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.57x | 1.05x | 0.75x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,577 for MPB. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +17.6% | +18.7% | +24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +18.3% | +35.5% | +52.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | +48.5% | +115.6% | +153.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +44.4% | +56.8% | +69.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | +108.5% | +127.3% | +149.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +14.1% | +29.2% | +36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMK's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.76x | 0.82x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.22 | $48.27 | $46.03 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.02 | $39.20 | $33.39 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +99.8% | +99.7% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 63.1 | 60.1 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 266K | 330K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.2% upside for MPB (target: $35) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $46.00 | $45.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 | 9 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +3.0% | +2.1% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $1.43 | $0.97 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). TRMK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MPB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 46x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +35. 8% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPB returned +164. 5% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Trustmark Corporation's 0. 82β — meaning TRMK is approximately 66% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 46x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPB: 2. 2% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is MPB or NBTB or TRMK or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, TRMK: +127. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPB and NBTB and TRMK and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.