Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPU vs EBON vs BTBT vs CIFR vs MARA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPU
Mega Matrix Corp.

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$37M
5Y Perf.+74.1%
EBON
Ebang International Holdings Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-51.2%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.40B
5Y Perf.+110.0%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+488.0%

MPU vs EBON vs BTBT vs CIFR vs MARA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPU logoMPU
EBON logoEBON
BTBT logoBTBT
CIFR logoCIFR
MARA logoMARA
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesComputer HardwareFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$37M$16M$589M$8.40B$4.83B
Revenue (TTM)$35M$12M$164M$224M$907M
Net Income (TTM)$-10M$-34M$137M$-898M$-1.31B
Gross Margin57.2%12.8%61.9%28.4%-47.7%
Operating Margin-26.7%-429.2%16.8%-150.7%-90.6%
Forward P/E9.2x
Total Debt$0.00$5M$14M$2.77B$3.65B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$200M$95M$628M$547M

MPU vs EBON vs BTBT vs CIFR vs MARALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPU
EBON
BTBT
CIFR
MARA
StockOct 20May 26Return
Mega Matrix Corp. (MPU)100174.1+74.1%
Ebang International… (EBON)1000.9-99.1%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10048.8-51.2%
Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR)100210.0+110.0%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)100588.0+488.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPU vs EBON vs BTBT vs CIFR vs MARA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Mega Matrix Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. CIFR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MPU
Mega Matrix Corp.
The Income Pick

MPU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.44
  • Rev growth 756.0%, EPS growth -76.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.1%
  • 756.0% revenue growth vs EBON's 11.4%
  • Beta 1.44 vs CIFR's 3.87
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
EBON
Ebang International Holdings Inc.
The Defensive Pick

EBON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.89, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 27.31x
  • Beta 1.89, current ratio 27.31x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.

  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 17.3% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
  • 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: bank quality
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
The Banking Pick

CIFR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 108.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
  • +5.8% vs EBON's -32.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMPU logoMPU756.0% revenue growth vs EBON's 11.4%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
Stability / SafetyMPU logoMPUBeta 1.44 vs CIFR's 3.87
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CIFR logoCIFR+5.8% vs EBON's -32.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs MPU's -60.6%, ROIC 6.5% vs -83.2%

MPU vs EBON vs BTBT vs CIFR vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MPUMega Matrix Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

EBONEbang International Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Service
87.9%$6M
Product
12.1%$793,047
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
CIFRCipher Mining Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining
100.0%$224M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M

MPU vs EBON vs BTBT vs CIFR vs MARA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 73.1x EBON's $12M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIFR's -3.7%. On growth, MPU holds the edge at -11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.EBON logoEBONEbang Internation…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35M$12M$164M$224M$907M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M-$51M$166M-$203M$627M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$10M-$34M$137M-$898M-$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M-$36M-$448M-$930M-$312M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.2%+12.8%+61.9%+28.4%-47.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-26.7%-4.3%+16.8%-150.7%-90.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-29.8%-2.8%+17.3%-3.7%-144.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.7%-2.9%-65.3%-3.1%-34.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.0%-21.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-189.8%+31.4%+2.8%-154.5%-4.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MPU and EBON and CIFR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.EBON logoEBONEbang Internation…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Market CapShares × price$37M$16M$589M$8.4B$4.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$28M-$180M$508M$10.5B$7.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.60x-1.07x9.15x-9.62x-3.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.02x2.40x3.60x37.49x5.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.61x0.06x0.56x9.44x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.99x
Evenly matched — MPU and EBON and CIFR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. EBON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.EBON logoEBONEbang Internation…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-88.0%-13.3%+21.4%-115.5%-30.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-60.6%-12.6%+19.0%-24.7%-17.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-83.2%-34.3%+6.5%-11.7%-9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-94.8%-8.9%+8.5%-15.6%-12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945633
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.03x3.31x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M-$196M-$81M$2.1B$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$200M$95M$628M$547M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$5M$14M$2.8B$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-402.18x-32.12x4.73x
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CIFR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $20,789 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $232 for EBON. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +584.9% total return vs EBON's -32.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 119.7% vs MPU's -30.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.EBON logoEBONEbang Internation…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.6%-25.0%-10.3%+27.7%+28.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-26.9%-32.8%-9.0%+584.9%-4.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.9%-61.5%-19.7%+960.8%+36.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.3%-97.7%-84.6%+107.9%-59.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.3%-98.4%-60.4%+108.9%-51.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.8%-27.2%-7.1%+119.7%+10.8%
CIFR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MPU and CIFR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MPU is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIFR currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs MPU's 13.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.EBON logoEBONEbang Internation…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.44x1.89x3.37x3.87x3.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.44$5.90$4.55$25.52$23.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.51$1.61$1.25$2.95$6.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.5%+40.7%+40.2%+81.1%+54.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.852.869.167.569.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded55K5K18.5M24.9M47.6M
Evenly matched — MPU and CIFR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MPU and EBON each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", CIFR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.EBON logoEBONEbang Internation…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$27.86$16.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts21219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises220
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.1%+1.0%
Evenly matched — MPU and EBON each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIFR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPU vs EBON vs BTBT vs CIFR vs MARA: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPU or EBON or BTBT or CIFR or MARA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mega Matrix Corp.

(MPU) is the stronger pick with 756. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 4% for Ebang International Holdings Inc. (EBON). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — MPU or EBON or BTBT or CIFR or MARA?

Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.

(CIFR) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to -97. 7% for Ebang International Holdings Inc. (EBON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIFR returned +108. 9% versus EBON's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — MPU or EBON or BTBT or CIFR or MARA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mega Matrix Corp.

(MPU) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 168% more volatile than MPU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ebang International Holdings Inc. (EBON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — MPU or EBON or BTBT or CIFR or MARA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mega Matrix Corp.

(MPU) is pulling ahead at 756. 0% versus 11. 4% for Ebang International Holdings Inc. (EBON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPU leads at 79. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — MPU or EBON or BTBT or CIFR or MARA?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -349. 9% for EBON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — MPU or EBON or BTBT or CIFR or MARA?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. MPU, EBON, CIFR, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is MPU or EBON or BTBT or CIFR or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mega Matrix Corp.

(MPU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPU: -64. 3%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between MPU and EBON and BTBT and CIFR and MARA?

These companies operate in different sectors (MPU (Industrials) and EBON (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and CIFR (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MPU is a small-cap high-growth stock; EBON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MPU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EBON

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CIFR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MPU and EBON and BTBT and CIFR and MARA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MPU: -11.0% · EBON: -21.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.