Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPU vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs BTBT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPU
Mega Matrix Corp.

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$37M
5Y Perf.+26.9%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.14B
5Y Perf.+1026.6%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+1714.3%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.58B
5Y Perf.+595.5%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.+91.6%

MPU vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs BTBT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPU logoMPU
RIOT logoRIOT
MARA logoMARA
CLSK logoCLSK
BTBT logoBTBT
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$37M$9.14B$4.83B$3.58B$589M
Revenue (TTM)$35M$647M$907M$785M$164M
Net Income (TTM)$-10M$-867M$-1.31B$-261M$137M
Gross Margin57.2%-15.6%-47.7%41.4%61.9%
Operating Margin-26.7%-61.8%-90.6%-26.4%16.8%
Forward P/E12.5x9.2x
Total Debt$0.00$280M$3.65B$824M$14M
Cash & Equiv.$9M$234M$547M$43M$95M

MPU vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs BTBTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPU
RIOT
MARA
CLSK
BTBT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Mega Matrix Corp. (MPU)100126.9+26.9%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)1001126.6+1026.6%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)1001814.3+1714.3%
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)100695.5+595.5%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)100191.6+91.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPU vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs BTBT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Mega Matrix Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. RIOT and CLSK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MPU
Mega Matrix Corp.
The Growth Leader

MPU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.

  • 756.0% revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
  • Beta 1.44 vs RIOT's 3.87
Best for: growth and stability
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
  • +207.5% vs MPU's -26.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
The Growth Play

CLSK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
  • 0.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: growth exposure
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 3.37, yield 0.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 3.37, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 5.39x
  • Beta 3.37, yield 0.3%, current ratio 5.39x
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMPU logoMPU756.0% revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTLower P/E (9.2x vs 12.5x)
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Stability / SafetyMPU logoMPUBeta 1.44 vs RIOT's 3.87
DividendsCLSK logoCLSK0.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RIOT logoRIOT+207.5% vs MPU's -26.9%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs MPU's -60.6%, ROIC 6.5% vs -83.2%

MPU vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MPUMega Matrix Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
FY 2021
Consolidated Revenues
96.9%$49M
Other Revenue And Eliminations
3.1%$2M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260

MPU vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs BTBT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGCLSK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 25.7x MPU's $35M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, CLSK holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35M$647M$907M$785M$164M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M-$450M$627M$181M$166M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$10M-$867M-$1.3B-$261M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M-$1.0B-$312M-$1.0B-$448M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.2%-15.6%-47.7%+41.4%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-26.7%-61.8%-90.6%-26.4%+16.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-29.8%-102.4%-144.6%-33.2%+17.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.7%-119.6%-34.4%-133.1%-65.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.0%+11.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-189.8%-60.0%-4.8%-2.6%+2.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MPU and RIOT and CLSK and BTBT each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 27% valuation discount to CLSK's 12.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$37M$9.1B$4.8B$3.6B$589M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$28M$9.2B$7.9B$4.4B$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.60x-12.36x-3.44x12.48x9.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.53x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.02x14.12x5.32x4.67x3.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.61x2.87x1.30x2.04x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.99x
Evenly matched — MPU and RIOT and CLSK and BTBT each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-88 for MPU. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-88.0%-28.8%-30.5%-13.7%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-60.6%-21.5%-17.1%-8.5%+19.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-83.2%-8.7%-9.0%+10.3%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-94.8%-11.0%-12.1%+13.7%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943356
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x1.05x0.38x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M$46M$3.1B$781M-$81M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$234M$547M$43M$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$280M$3.6B$824M$14M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-402.18x-16.47x4.73x-18.49x
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — RIOT and CLSK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLSK five years ago would be worth $7,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +207.5% total return vs MPU's -26.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 48.8% vs MPU's -30.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.6%+70.3%+28.2%+21.0%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-26.9%+207.5%-4.7%+74.1%-9.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.9%+129.8%+36.1%+229.7%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.3%-27.8%-59.5%-26.9%-84.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.3%+787.3%-51.6%-84.3%-60.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.8%+32.0%+10.8%+48.8%-7.1%
Evenly matched — RIOT and CLSK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MPU and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MPU is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MPU's 13.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.44x3.87x3.11x3.39x3.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.44$24.14$23.45$23.61$4.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.51$7.68$6.66$7.91$1.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.5%+99.9%+54.2%+59.2%+40.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.874.569.671.569.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded55K18.4M47.6M19.0M18.5M
Evenly matched — MPU and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MPU and RIOT and CLSK and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: RIOT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). For income investors, BTBT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.31% vs CLSK's 0.24%.

MetricMPU logoMPUMega Matrix Corp.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.90$16.13$20.21$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1819102
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2220
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.03$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%+1.0%+4.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — MPU and RIOT and CLSK and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPU vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPU or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or BTBT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mega Matrix Corp.

(MPU) is the stronger pick with 756. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MPU or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or BTBT?

On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus CleanSpark, Inc. at 12. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MPU or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or BTBT?

Over the past 5 years, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) delivered a total return of -26. 9%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus CLSK's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MPU or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or BTBT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mega Matrix Corp.

(MPU) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 168% more volatile than MPU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MPU or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or BTBT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mega Matrix Corp.

(MPU) is pulling ahead at 756. 0% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MPU or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or BTBT?

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MPU or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or BTBT?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield), CLSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MPU, RIOT, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is MPU or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.

(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MPU and RIOT and MARA and CLSK and BTBT?

These companies operate in different sectors (MPU (Industrials) and RIOT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MPU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MPU and RIOT and MARA and CLSK and BTBT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MPU: -11.0% · RIOT: 71.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.