Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MRBK logo
MRBK
CZWI logo
CZWI
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
NBTB logo
NBTB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MRBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs NBTB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MRBK
Meridian Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$237M
5Y Perf.+151.7%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%

MRBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs NBTB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MRBK logoMRBK
CZWI logoCZWI
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
NBTB logoNBTB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology ServicesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$237M$207M$896.00B$20.26B$2.52B
Revenue (TTM)$205M$90M$280.33B$11.66B$902M
Net Income (TTM)$22M$14M$57.05B$2.67B$169M
Gross Margin54.4%54.7%60.0%37.6%73.6%
Operating Margin13.8%7.0%25.9%17.9%24.3%
Forward P/E9.7x11.8x14.4x6.2x11.5x
Total Debt$178M$52M$942.38B$4.01B$327M
Cash & Equiv.$10M$119M$343.34B$599M$185M

MRBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs NBTBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MRBK
CZWI
JPM
FIS
NBTB
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Meridian Corporation (MRBK)100251.7+151.7%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MRBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs NBTB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Meridian Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. CZWI and NBTB also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MRBK
Meridian Corporation
The Banking Pick

MRBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.

  • NIM 3.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • +57.5% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: bank quality
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs MRBK's 158.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.64
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.64
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs MRBK's 10.6%
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)MRBK logoMRBK+57.5% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0%

MRBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MRBKMeridian Corporation
FY 2025
Investment Advice
100.0%$6M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M

MRBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs NBTB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCZWILAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRBK's 10.6%.

MetricMRBK logoMRBKMeridian Corporat…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$205M$90M$280.3B$11.7B$902M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$29M$9M$81.4B$4.1B$241M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$22M$14M$57.0B$2.7B$169M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5M$11M$100.9B$2.8B$225M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.4%+54.7%+60.0%+37.6%+73.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.8%+7.0%+25.9%+17.9%+24.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.6%+16.0%+20.4%+22.9%+18.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.6%+12.4%+36.0%+23.9%+24.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.5%+63.0%+16.0%+30.6%+39.5%
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.6x trailing earnings, MRBK trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMRBK logoMRBKMeridian Corporat…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
Market CapShares × price$237M$207M$896.0B$20.3B$2.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$405M$140M$1.50T$23.7B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.56x14.70x16.00x52.27x14.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.74x11.79x14.40x6.24x11.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.90x0.90x2.14x2.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.19x15.69x18.36x6.50x11.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.15x2.29x3.20x1.90x2.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.15x1.11x2.47x1.46x1.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.51x19.90x8.88x7.21x11.49x
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — FIS and NBTB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRBK scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMRBK logoMRBKMeridian Corporat…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.8%+7.8%+15.9%+18.4%+9.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.8%+1.3%+7.5%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.9%+2.0%+4.5%+6.0%+7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.1%+0.6%+8.9%+6.6%+2.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.89x0.28x2.60x0.29x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$168M-$67M$599.0B$3.4B$142M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$119M$343.3B$599M$185M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$178M$52M$942.4B$4.0B$327M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.36x0.16x0.74x21.16x1.05x
Evenly matched — FIS and NBTB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MRBK leads with a +57.5% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRBK logoMRBKMeridian Corporat…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+18.2%+24.3%-0.5%-38.9%+17.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+57.5%+52.1%+21.8%-49.4%+18.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+120.0%+153.7%+138.2%-18.9%+48.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.7%+69.0%+118.2%-67.3%+44.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+158.0%+149.0%+465.8%-25.6%+108.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.1%+36.4%+33.6%-6.8%+14.1%
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CZWI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRBK logoMRBKMeridian Corporat…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x0.50x0.94x0.61x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.67$22.62$337.25$82.74$48.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.16$12.83$262.71$37.91$39.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.1%+94.9%+95.1%+47.4%+99.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.251.259.130.863.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded117K41K7.0M5.6M266K
Evenly matched — CZWI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MRBK as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.

MetricMRBK logoMRBKMeridian Corporat…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.00$339.75$62.88$46.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts42613710
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+1.7%+1.9%+4.2%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0615113
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.49$0.37$5.95$1.63$1.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+3.0%+3.9%+7.0%+0.4%
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallCitizens Community Bancorp,… (CZWI)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MRBK vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Meridian Corporation (MRBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Meridian Corporation (MRBK) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB?

On trailing P/E, Meridian Corporation (MRBK) is the cheapest at 10.

6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 90% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Meridian Corporation grew EPS 30. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is MRBK or CZWI or JPM or FIS or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MRBK and CZWI and JPM and FIS and NBTB?

These companies operate in different sectors (MRBK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and NBTB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MRBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.