Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MRCC vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
MRCC vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $110M | $1.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 60.8% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | 51.7% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $191M | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $43M |
MRCC vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monroe Capital Corp… (MRCC) | 100 | 65.4 | -34.6% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRCC vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRCC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.64x
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
CSWC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 10.2%
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth -28.3%
- 234.2% 10Y total return vs MRCC's 22.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.7% NII/revenue growth vs MRCC's -39.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 14.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs CSWC's 0.84 | |
| Dividends | 10.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MRCC's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs MRCC's -6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% |
MRCC vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRCC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 7.7x MRCC's $21M. MRCC is the more profitable business, keeping 53.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSWC's 43.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.8% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.7% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +53.8% | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.5% | +113.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MRCC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, MRCC trades at a 41% valuation discount to CSWC's 16.3x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $110M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $108M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.58x | 16.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.94x | 10.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.21x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.55x | 8.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.95x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-3 for MRCC. CSWC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRCC's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRCC scores 6/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.15x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $189M | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $191M | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,905 for MRCC. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +34.0% total return vs MRCC's -6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 20.7% vs MRCC's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.4% | +11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.8% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.0% | +75.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.9% | +51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.8% | +234.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.7% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRCC and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSWC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs MRCC's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.76 | $24.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.04 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 156K | 664K |
Analyst Outlook
CSWC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MRCC as "Hold" and CSWC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.5% upside for MRCC (target: $8) vs -6.2% for CSWC (target: $23). For income investors, CSWC offers the higher dividend yield at 10.20% vs MRCC's 0.24%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +10.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.93 | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CSWC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MRCC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MRCC vs CSWC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRCC or CSWC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger pick with 7.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 7% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRCC or CSWC?
On trailing P/E, Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus Capital Southwest Corporation at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Capital Southwest Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRCC or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +51.
4%, compared to -0. 9% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +234. 2% versus MRCC's +22. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRCC or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 84β — meaning CSWC is approximately 13% more volatile than MRCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 115% for Monroe Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRCC or CSWC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is pulling ahead at 7.
7% versus -39. 7% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Monroe Capital Corporation grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Capital Southwest Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRCC or CSWC?
Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) is the more profitable company, earning 53.
8% net margin versus 43. 1% for Capital Southwest Corporation — meaning it keeps 53. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRCC leads at 51. 7% versus 48. 5% for CSWC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSWC leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRCC or CSWC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) trades at 10.
1x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Monroe Capital Corporation — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRCC: 57. 5% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRCC or CSWC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the highest yield at 10. 2%, versus 0. 2% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC).
09Is MRCC or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84), 10. 2% yield, +234. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSWC: +234. 2%, MRCC: +22. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRCC and CSWC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CSWC pays a dividend while MRCC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.