REIT - Residential
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRP vs NTST vs NNN vs PINE vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
MRP vs NTST vs NNN vs PINE vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $2.02B | $8.86B | $289M | $58.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $713M | $193M | $936M | $65M | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $463M | $11M | $387M | $-415K | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 96.9% | 90.2% | 81.4% | -4.1% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 85.1% | 31.9% | 63.3% | 28.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 68.5x | 23.0x | 38.8x | 39.2x |
| Total Debt | $2.11B | $1.12B | $4.82B | $394M | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $14M | $5M | $5M | $435M |
MRP vs NTST vs NNN vs PINE vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Millrose Properties… (MRP) | 100 | 127.4 | +27.4% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 109.8 | +9.8% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 121.5 | +21.5% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 110.0 | +10.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRP vs NTST vs NNN vs PINE vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 47.9% 10Y total return vs PINE's 42.5%
- 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 39.2x)
- 65.0% margin vs PINE's -0.6%
NTST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 151.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 77.3%, current ratio 7.06x
- PEG 1.16 vs NNN's 2.07
- Beta 0.05, yield 4.1%, current ratio 7.06x
NNN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 5.1%
- Beta 0.04 vs MRP's 0.82
PINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +44.6% vs O's +13.8%
Among these 5 stocks, O doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 39.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 65.0% margin vs PINE's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MRP's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NNN's 5.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.6% vs O's +13.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 5.6% vs 2.2% |
MRP vs NTST vs NNN vs PINE vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MRP vs NTST vs NNN vs PINE vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MRP leads in 4 of 6 categories
NNN leads 1 • NTST leads 0 • PINE leads 0 • O leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 91.4x PINE's $65M. MRP is the more profitable business, keeping 65.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, MRP holds the edge at +135.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $713M | $193M | $936M | $65M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $610M | $151M | $867M | $45M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $463M | $11M | $387M | -$415,000 | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.4B | -$126M | $464M | -$46M | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.9% | +90.2% | +81.4% | -4.1% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +85.1% | +31.9% | +63.3% | +28.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +5.7% | +41.4% | -0.6% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -65.3% | +49.6% | -71.7% | +68.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +135.7% | +26.5% | +4.1% | +29.6% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.7% | +189.9% | -2.0% | +185.7% | +17.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MRP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, MRP trades at a 95% valuation discount to NTST's 248.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 2.02x vs O's 75.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $2.0B | $8.9B | $289M | $58.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.6B | $3.1B | $13.7B | $678M | $90.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.94x | 248.41x | 22.51x | -91.59x | 53.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.41x | 68.49x | 23.04x | 38.82x | 39.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.19x | 2.02x | — | 75.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.35x | 22.10x | 16.32x | 14.79x | 22.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.48x | 11.13x | 9.57x | 4.77x | 10.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.18x | 1.99x | 1.04x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.22x | 18.44x | 13.29x | — | 14.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MRP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. MRP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PINE's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTST scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +0.8% | +8.8% | -0.1% | +2.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +0.4% | +4.1% | -0.1% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +1.7% | +4.8% | +2.2% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +2.4% | +6.4% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.77x | 1.09x | 1.31x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $1.1B | $4.8B | $390M | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $14M | $5M | $5M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $1.1B | $4.8B | $394M | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.36x | 1.15x | 2.93x | 0.82x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRP five years ago would be worth $14,786 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,242 for NTST. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +44.6% total return vs O's +13.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRP at 13.9% vs O's 5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +17.1% | +20.9% | +23.6% | +11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.3% | +29.1% | +15.1% | +44.6% | +13.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +24.8% | +24.7% | +44.7% | +18.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +2.4% | +15.9% | +35.4% | +14.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +42.0% | +42.3% | +42.5% | +46.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | +7.7% | +7.6% | +13.1% | +5.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NNN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NNN is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRP's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs MRP's 80.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.05x | 0.04x | 0.21x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.00 | $21.30 | $46.90 | $20.80 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.30 | $16.14 | $38.90 | $13.10 | $55.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +95.6% | +99.3% | +96.9% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 49.7 | 63.6 | 55.0 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.2M | 1.6M | 144K | 5.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MRP and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRP as "Buy", NTST as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", PINE as "Buy", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.6% upside for NTST (target: $22) vs -0.3% for NNN (target: $46). For income investors, MRP offers the higher dividend yield at 6.18% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.33 | $46.44 | $20.60 | $68.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 18 | 29 | 12 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +4.1% | +5.1% | +0.2% | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 36 | 7 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.80 | $0.84 | $2.36 | $0.04 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | 0.0% |
MRP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NNN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
MRP vs NTST vs NNN vs PINE vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 20. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O?
On trailing P/E, Millrose Properties, Inc.
(MRP) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 248. 4x. On forward P/E, Millrose Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 16x versus Realty Income Corporation's 75. 30x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O?
Over the past 5 years, Millrose Properties, Inc.
(MRP) delivered a total return of +47. 9%, compared to +2. 4% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRP returned +47. 9% versus NTST's +42. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Millrose Properties, Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning MRP is approximately 1920% more volatile than NNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 131% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 20. 9% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Millrose Properties, Inc. grew EPS 264. 9% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O?
Millrose Properties, Inc.
(MRP) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 3% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRP leads at 80. 9% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 90. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus Realty Income Corporation's 75. 30x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 68. 5x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 59. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTST: 9. 6% to $22. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is MRP or NTST or NNN or PINE or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNN: +42. 3%, MRP: +47. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRP and NTST and NNN and PINE and O?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MRP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MRP, NTST, NNN, O pay a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.