Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | QCOM | 13.7% revenue growth vs MRVL's 4.7% |
| Value | QCOM | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 28.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | MRVL | 31.7% net margin vs QCOM's 12.0% |
| Stability / Safety | QCOM | Beta 1.48 vs MRVL's 2.25 |
| Dividends | QCOM | 2.4% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs MRVL's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | QCOM | -7.2% vs MRVL's -10.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MRVL | 11.5% ROA vs QCOM's 10.1%, ROIC -3.1% vs 29.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Marvell Technology is a semiconductor company that designs and sells data infrastructure chips for data centers, enterprise networking, and automotive applications. It generates revenue primarily from data center products (~40%), enterprise networking (~30%), and carrier infrastructure (~20%), with the remainder from consumer and automotive segments. The company's moat lies in its specialized expertise in data processing, storage, and networking semiconductors—particularly in high-growth areas like cloud computing and AI infrastructure.
Qualcomm is a semiconductor and wireless technology company that designs and licenses foundational technologies for mobile communications. It generates revenue primarily through selling smartphone chipsets (~75% of revenue) and licensing its extensive patent portfolio for wireless standards like 5G (~25% of revenue). The company's key advantage is its massive portfolio of essential wireless patents—particularly in CDMA and 5G—which creates a licensing moat that generates high-margin recurring revenue.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MRVL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.9B annually — 5.8x MRVL's $7.8B. MRVL is the more profitable business, keeping 31.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QCOM's 12.0%. On growth, MRVL holds the edge at +36.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MRVLMarvell Technolog… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $44.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.5B | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.7% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +27.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +28.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.8% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QCOM's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRVL's 116.5x.
| Metric | MRVLMarvell Technolog… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70.7B | $152.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $74.1B | $161.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -80.09x | 28.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.71x | 12.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 116.46x | 11.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.27x | 3.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.27x | 7.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 50.91x | 11.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $18 for MRVL. MRVL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QCOM scores 6/9 vs MRVL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MRVLMarvell Technolog… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.6% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.8% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $948M | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.82x | 18.76x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MRVL five years ago would be worth $16,739 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,332 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, QCOM leads with a -7.2% total return vs MRVL's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRVL at 22.2% vs QCOM's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MRVLMarvell Technolog… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.5% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.8% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.5% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.4% | +13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +780.5% | +234.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.2% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
QCOM is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRVL currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs QCOM's 69.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MRVLMarvell Technolog… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.77 | $205.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.09 | $120.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.5% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.3M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MRVL as "Buy" and QCOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for MRVL (target: $118) vs 13.4% for QCOM (target: $162). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.42% vs MRVL's 0.29%.
| Metric | MRVLMarvell Technolog… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $117.68 | $161.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 71 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +5.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 369.3 | +269.3% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 194.92 | +94.9% |
Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) returned +67% over 5 years vs QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)'s +13%. A $10,000 investment in MRVL 5 years ago would be worth $16,739 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | $2.6B | $5.8B | +117.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | $23.6B | $44.3B | +88.0% |
Marvell Technology, Inc.'s revenue grew from $2.6B (2016) to $5.8B (2025) — a 9.0% CAGR. QUALCOMM Incorporated's revenue grew from $23.6B (2016) to $44.3B (2025) — a 7.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | -30.6% | -15.3% | +49.9% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 24.2% | 12.5% | -48.3% |
Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net margin went from -31% (2016) to -15% (2025). QUALCOMM Incorporated's net margin went from 24% (2016) to 13% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 39 | 34.1 | -12.6% |
QUALCOMM Incorporated has traded in a 10x–39x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~28x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | -1.59 | -1.02 | +35.8% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 3.81 | 5.01 | +31.5% |
Marvell Technology, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.59 (2016) to $-1.02 (2025). QUALCOMM Incorporated's EPS grew from $3.81 (2016) to $5.01 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Marvell Technology, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+99% vs 2021). QUALCOMM Incorporated generated $13B FCF in 2025 (+48% vs 2021).
MRVL vs QCOM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRVL or QCOM a better buy right now?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 28.4x trailing P/E (12.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRVL or QCOM?
On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 12.7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRVL or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) delivered a total return of +67.4%, compared to +13.3% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). A $10,000 investment in MRVL five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRVL returned +780.5% versus QCOM's +234.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRVL or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.48β versus Marvell Technology, Inc.'s 2.25β — meaning MRVL is approximately 52% more volatile than QCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MRVL or QCOM?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 12.5% net margin versus -15.3% for Marvell Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27.9% versus -12.5% for MRVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QCOM leads at 55.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MRVL or QCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 12.7x forward P/E versus 28.7x for Marvell Technology, Inc. — 16.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRVL: 44.1% to $117.68.
07Which pays a better dividend — MRVL or QCOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the highest yield at 2.4%, versus 0.3% for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL).
08Is MRVL or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.4% yield, +234.4% 10Y return). Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) carries a higher beta of 2.25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +234.4%, MRVL: +780.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MRVL and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. QCOM pays a dividend while MRVL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.