Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MRX vs VIRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
MRX vs VIRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $3.60B | $4.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $3.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $526M | $551M |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | 32.0% | 33.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $10.17B | $8.98B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.38B | $1.06B |
MRX vs VIRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marex Group plc Ord… (MRX) | 100 | 260.0 | +160.0% |
| Virtu Financial, In… (VIRT) | 100 | 231.3 | +131.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRX vs VIRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, MRX is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
VIRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 72.7%
- 216.3% 10Y total return vs MRX's 169.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs MRX's 25.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs MRX's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs MRX's 0.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs MRX's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.6% vs MRX's +9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs MRX's 0.4% |
MRX vs VIRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MRX vs VIRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIRT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIRT and MRX operate at a comparable scale, with $3.6B and $3.6B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.9% (VIRT) to 8.5% (MRX).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $526M | $551M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $883M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.7% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +33.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.8% | +96.3% |
Valuation Metrics
VIRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, VIRT trades at a 24% valuation discount to MRX's 12.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MRX's 6.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VIRT's 9.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.94x | 9.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.23x | 8.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.18x | 9.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.02x | 2.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.50x | 3.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VIRT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRX delivers a 49.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $29 for VIRT. VIRT carries lower financial leverage with a 4.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRX's 8.05x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +49.7% | +29.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.05x | 4.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.4B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.2B | $9.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.54x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VIRT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRX five years ago would be worth $26,909 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,274 for VIRT. Over the past 12 months, VIRT leads with a +23.6% total return vs MRX's +9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIRT at 44.6% vs MRX's 39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.4% | +54.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.1% | +23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.1% | +202.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.1% | +92.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.1% | +216.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.1% | +44.6% |
Risk & Volatility
VIRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRX's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VIRT currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs MRX's 91.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.60 | $52.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.91 | $31.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.8 | 60.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
VIRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MRX as "Buy" and VIRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for MRX (target: $55) vs -4.4% for VIRT (target: $48). For income investors, VIRT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs MRX's 1.46%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | $48.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.73 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +4.4% |
VIRT leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
MRX vs VIRT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRX or VIRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Virtu Financial, Inc.
(VIRT) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 25. 4% for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares (MRX). Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares (MRX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRX or VIRT?
On trailing P/E, Virtu Financial, Inc.
(VIRT) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares at 12. 9x. On forward P/E, Virtu Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRX or VIRT?
Over the past 5 years, Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares (MRX) delivered a total return of +169.
1%, compared to +92. 7% for Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIRT returned +216. 3% versus MRX's +169. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRX or VIRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virtu Financial, Inc.
(VIRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares's 0. 74β — meaning MRX is approximately 84% more volatile than VIRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 8% for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRX or VIRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Virtu Financial, Inc.
(VIRT) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus 25. 4% for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares (MRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virtu Financial, Inc. grew EPS 72. 7% year-over-year, compared to 42. 3% for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRX or VIRT?
Virtu Financial, Inc.
(VIRT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 8. 5% for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIRT leads at 33. 8% versus 32. 0% for MRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRX leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRX or VIRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Virtu Financial, Inc.
(VIRT) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 10. 2x for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRX: 9. 8% to $55. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRX or VIRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 5% for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares (MRX).
09Is MRX or VIRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Virtu Financial, Inc.
(VIRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 2. 0% yield, +216. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIRT: +216. 3%, MRX: +169. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRX and VIRT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.