Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MSGE vs AMC vs LYV vs CNK vs IMAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
MSGE vs AMC vs LYV vs CNK vs IMAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $3.15B | $930M | $38.65B | $3.21B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $5.03B | $25.61B | $3.12B | $405M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $42M | $-547M | $84M | $138M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 31.5% | 75.3% | 40.3% | 40.7% | 58.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 46.5% | 3.4% | 11.0% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 56.8x | — | 115.8x | 13.0x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.20B | $8.14B | $12.44B | $3.78B | $297M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $429M | $7.11B | $344M | $151M |
MSGE vs AMC vs LYV vs CNK vs IMAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| AMC Entertainment H… (AMC) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 338.3 | +238.3% |
| Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK) | 100 | 182.8 | +82.8% |
| IMAX Corporation (IMAX) | 100 | 282.6 | +182.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSGE vs AMC vs LYV vs CNK vs IMAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSGE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +83.6% vs AMC's -43.9%
AMC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LYV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs IMAX's 8.9%
CNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and stability.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 115.8x)
- Beta 0.22 vs AMC's 1.82
- 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
IMAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 31.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 69.5%, current ratio 1.67x
- Beta 0.43, current ratio 1.67x
- 16.5% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.5% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 115.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.7% margin vs AMC's -10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs AMC's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs AMC's -43.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs AMC's -6.9%, ROIC 12.7% vs 23.7% |
MSGE vs AMC vs LYV vs CNK vs IMAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MSGE vs AMC vs LYV vs CNK vs IMAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
LYV leads 1 • MSGE leads 0 • AMC leads 0 • CNK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYV is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.6B annually — 63.3x IMAX's $405M. IMAX is the more profitable business, keeping 10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMC's -10.9%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $5.0B | $25.6B | $3.1B | $405M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $245M | $2.6B | $1.6B | $545M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $42M | -$547M | $84M | $138M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $289M | -$124M | $1.2B | $177M | $115M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.5% | +75.3% | +40.3% | +40.7% | +58.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +46.5% | +3.4% | +11.0% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -10.9% | +0.3% | +4.4% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | -2.5% | +4.8% | +5.7% | +28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.4% | +21.2% | +12.1% | -4.7% | -6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -123.5% | +53.2% | -4.8% | -18.2% | +65.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMC and IMAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.4x trailing earnings, CNK trades at a 70% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMC's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSGE's 24.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $930M | $38.6B | $3.2B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $8.6B | $44.0B | $6.6B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 86.64x | -1.24x | -692.98x | 26.42x | 56.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 56.83x | — | 115.80x | 12.97x | 21.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.97x | 4.67x | 19.89x | 12.23x | 13.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.35x | 0.19x | 1.53x | 1.03x | 4.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 21.20x | 8.92x | 4.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.88x | — | 115.84x | 18.11x | 16.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMAX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNK delivers a 25.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $4 for LYV. IMAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNK's 9.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMAX scores 7/9 vs AMC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | — | +4.4% | +25.4% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | -6.9% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +23.7% | +19.7% | +7.5% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +29.0% | +13.4% | +9.3% | +14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 6.84x | 9.14x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $7.7B | $5.3B | $3.4B | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $429M | $7.1B | $344M | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $8.1B | $12.4B | $3.8B | $297M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.43x | 0.35x | 3.68x | 1.89x | 21.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYV five years ago would be worth $20,800 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $160 for AMC. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs AMC's -43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYV at 28.8% vs AMC's -70.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.8% | -5.6% | +14.5% | +17.2% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +83.6% | -43.9% | +24.0% | -10.7% | +38.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.8% | -97.4% | +113.7% | +71.0% | +79.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.2% | -98.4% | +108.0% | +29.3% | +70.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.6% | -84.7% | +622.5% | -6.6% | +8.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.9% | -70.5% | +28.8% | +19.6% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSGE and CNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMC's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs AMC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.82x | 0.80x | 0.22x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.86 | $4.08 | $175.25 | $34.01 | $43.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.31 | $0.93 | $125.34 | $21.60 | $24.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +37.3% | +94.9% | +80.8% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 60.0 | 63.6 | 43.7 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 312K | 30.1M | 2.8M | 2.1M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LYV and IMAX each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSGE as "Buy", AMC as "Hold", LYV as "Buy", CNK as "Buy", IMAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.6% upside for AMC (target: $2) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66). CNK is the only dividend payer here at 1.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.29 | $2.00 | $181.00 | $31.67 | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 28 | 44 | 31 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +8.6% | +0.1% |
IMAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LYV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
MSGE vs AMC vs LYV vs CNK vs IMAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the stronger pick with 16.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX?
On trailing P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX?
Over the past 5 years, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) delivered a total return of +108. 0%, compared to -98. 4% for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +622. 5% versus AMC's -84. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning AMC is approximately 735% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 9% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is pulling ahead at 16.
5% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IMAX Corporation grew EPS 31. 3% year-over-year, compared to -108. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYV leads at 14. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX?
IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
5% net margin versus -13. 0% for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMC leads at 38. 1% versus 5. 9% for LYV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMC leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 102. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMC: 31. 6% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX?
In this comparison, CNK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MSGE, AMC, LYV, IMAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MSGE or AMC or LYV or CNK or IMAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield). AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 6%, AMC: -84. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MSGE and AMC and LYV and CNK and IMAX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMAX is a small-cap high-growth stock. CNK pays a dividend while MSGE, AMC, LYV, IMAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 10%
- Gross Margin > 45%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.