Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MSGE vs CNK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.71B
5Y Perf.-15.5%
CNK
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.24B
5Y Perf.+84.5%

MSGE vs CNK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MSGE logoMSGE
CNK logoCNK
IndustryEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Cap$2.71B$3.24B
Revenue (TTM)$1.01B$3.12B
Net Income (TTM)$52M$138M
Gross Margin46.1%40.7%
Operating Margin13.5%11.0%
Forward P/E57.0x13.1x
Total Debt$1.20B$3.78B
Cash & Equiv.$43M$344M

MSGE vs CNKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MSGE
CNK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Madison Square Gard… (MSGE)10084.5-15.5%
Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK)100184.5+84.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MSGE vs CNK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CNK leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
The Quality Compounder

MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.

  • 5.1% margin vs CNK's 4.4%
  • +88.1% vs CNK's -8.9%
Best for: quality and momentum
CNK
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

CNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.0%
  • Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth -49.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
  • -6.0% 10Y total return vs MSGE's -24.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCNK logoCNK2.1% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7%
ValueCNK logoCNKLower P/E (13.1x vs 57.0x)
Quality / MarginsMSGE logoMSGE5.1% margin vs CNK's 4.4%
Stability / SafetyCNK logoCNKBeta 0.22 vs MSGE's 0.94
DividendsCNK logoCNK1.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MSGE logoMSGE+88.1% vs CNK's -8.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CNK logoCNK3.0% ROA vs MSGE's 2.8%, ROIC 7.5% vs 8.5%

MSGE vs CNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MSGEMadison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
FY 2025
Entertainment
45.2%$712M
Ticketing And Venue License Fee Revenues
28.8%$453M
Sponsorship and Signage, Suite And Advertising Commission Revenues
16.0%$253M
Food, Beverage And Merchandise Revenues
9.6%$151M
Product and Service, Other
0.4%$6M
CNKCinemark Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Admissions Revenue
49.6%$1.5B
Concessions
39.4%$1.2B
Other Revenues
11.0%$343M

MSGE vs CNK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSGELAGGINGCNK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSGE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

CNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 3.1x MSGE's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.1% (MSGE) to 4.4% (CNK). On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.0B$3.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$195M$545M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$52M$138M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$207M$177M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.1%+40.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.5%+11.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.1%+4.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.4%+5.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.9%-4.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.4%-18.2%
MSGE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CNK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 26.7x trailing earnings, CNK trades at a 69% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNK's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSGE's 21.5x.

MetricMSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…
Market CapShares × price$2.7B$3.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.9B$6.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS86.95x26.66x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.57.04x13.09x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.48x12.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.87x1.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.06x18.28x
CNK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSGE leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

MSGE delivers a 144.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $144 in annual profit, vs $25 for CNK. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs CNK's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+144.2%+25.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.8%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.5%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.0%+9.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage9.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.2B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$43M$344M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$3.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.08x1.89x
MSGE leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CNK five years ago would be worth $13,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,718 for MSGE. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +88.1% total return vs CNK's -8.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 25.0% vs CNK's 19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.2%+18.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+88.1%-8.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.5%+72.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.8%+37.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.4%-6.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.0%+19.9%
MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MSGE and CNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGE's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs CNK's 81.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.94x0.22x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$68.51$34.01
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$33.38$21.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.7%+81.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.837.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded304K2.1M
Evenly matched — MSGE and CNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates MSGE as "Buy" and CNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.2% upside for CNK (target: $32) vs -1.0% for MSGE (target: $66). CNK is the only dividend payer here at 1.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$66.29$31.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts1231
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.5%+8.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MSGE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMadison Square Garden Enter… (MSGE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MSGE vs CNK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MSGE or CNK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is the stronger pick with 2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MSGE or CNK?

On trailing P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is the cheapest at 26. 7x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 9x. On forward P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MSGE or CNK?

Over the past 5 years, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) delivered a total return of +37. 4%, compared to -22. 8% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNK returned -6. 0% versus MSGE's -24. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MSGE or CNK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning MSGE is approximately 332% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — MSGE or CNK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is pulling ahead at 2. 1% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cinemark Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -49. 5% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSGE leads at 13. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MSGE or CNK?

Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 4% net margin versus 4. 0% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSGE leads at 13. 0% versus 11. 0% for CNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSGE leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MSGE or CNK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 0x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 44. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNK: 14. 2% to $31. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MSGE or CNK?

In this comparison, CNK (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. MSGE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MSGE or CNK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 0%, MSGE: -24. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MSGE and CNK?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

CNK pays a dividend while MSGE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MSGE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MSGE and CNK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MSGE: 12.9% · CNK: -4.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(MSGE: 5.1% · CNK: 4.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MSGE: 86.9x · CNK: 26.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.