Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MSGE vs CNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
MSGE vs CNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $2.71B | $3.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.01B | $3.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $52M | $138M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | 57.0x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.20B | $3.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $344M |
MSGE vs CNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.5 | -15.5% |
| Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK) | 100 | 184.5 | +84.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSGE vs CNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- 5.1% margin vs CNK's 4.4%
- +88.1% vs CNK's -8.9%
CNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth -49.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- -6.0% 10Y total return vs MSGE's -24.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.1% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 57.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs CNK's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs MSGE's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.1% vs CNK's -8.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs MSGE's 2.8%, ROIC 7.5% vs 8.5% |
MSGE vs CNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MSGE vs CNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSGE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 3.1x MSGE's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.1% (MSGE) to 4.4% (CNK). On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $195M | $545M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $52M | $138M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $207M | $177M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | -4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.4% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CNK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.7x trailing earnings, CNK trades at a 69% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNK's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSGE's 21.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 86.95x | 26.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.04x | 13.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.48x | 12.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 9.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.06x | 18.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE delivers a 144.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $144 in annual profit, vs $25 for CNK. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs CNK's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +144.2% | +25.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 9.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $344M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | 1.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNK five years ago would be worth $13,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,718 for MSGE. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +88.1% total return vs CNK's -8.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 25.0% vs CNK's 19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.2% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.1% | -8.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.5% | +72.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.8% | +37.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.4% | -6.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.0% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSGE and CNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGE's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs CNK's 81.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.51 | $34.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.38 | $21.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +81.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 37.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 304K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MSGE as "Buy" and CNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.2% upside for CNK (target: $32) vs -1.0% for MSGE (target: $66). CNK is the only dividend payer here at 1.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.29 | $31.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +8.5% |
MSGE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MSGE vs CNK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSGE or CNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger pick with 2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSGE or CNK?
On trailing P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the cheapest at 26. 7x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 9x. On forward P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSGE or CNK?
Over the past 5 years, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) delivered a total return of +37. 4%, compared to -22. 8% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNK returned -6. 0% versus MSGE's -24. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSGE or CNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning MSGE is approximately 332% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MSGE or CNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is pulling ahead at 2. 1% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cinemark Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -49. 5% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSGE leads at 13. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSGE or CNK?
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 4% net margin versus 4. 0% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSGE leads at 13. 0% versus 11. 0% for CNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSGE leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MSGE or CNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 0x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 44. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNK: 14. 2% to $31. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MSGE or CNK?
In this comparison, CNK (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. MSGE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MSGE or CNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 0%, MSGE: -24. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MSGE and CNK?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CNK pays a dividend while MSGE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.