Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MSGM vs TTWO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
MSGM vs TTWO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $22M | $46.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $6.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-3.96B |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | -59.3% |
| Forward P/E | 3.2x | 56.9x |
| Total Debt | $18K | $4.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $1.46B |
MSGM vs TTWO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motorsport Games In… (MSGM) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 110.8 | +10.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSGM vs TTWO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSGM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 252.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 2.25x
- 30.0% revenue growth vs TTWO's 5.3%
TTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.63
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs MSGM's -98.7%
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 0.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% revenue growth vs TTWO's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.2x vs 56.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 61.3% margin vs TTWO's -60.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs MSGM's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.4% vs TTWO's -4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 76.4% ROA vs TTWO's -39.6%, ROIC 81.5% vs -49.8% |
MSGM vs TTWO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MSGM vs TTWO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSGM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTWO is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 580.6x MSGM's $11M. MSGM is the more profitable business, keeping 61.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTWO's -60.4%. On growth, MSGM holds the edge at +94.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $488M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | -59.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | -60.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.9% | +24.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +112.5% | +29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MSGM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $46.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $49.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.15x | -8.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.10x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 8.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.88x | 18.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.38x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGM delivers a 129.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $130 in annual profit, vs $-113 for TTWO. MSGM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTWO's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGM scores 6/9 vs TTWO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +129.7% | -113.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +76.4% | -39.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +81.5% | -49.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.3% | -57.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17,575 | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 87.32x | -69.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTWO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTWO five years ago would be worth $13,164 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $209 for MSGM. Over the past 12 months, MSGM leads with a +80.4% total return vs TTWO's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTWO at 20.9% vs MSGM's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.4% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.4% | -4.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.0% | +76.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +31.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +535.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.4% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
TTWO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTWO is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGM's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.41 | $264.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.11 | $187.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +83.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $291.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 56 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MSGM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TTWO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MSGM vs TTWO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSGM or TTWO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Motorsport Games Inc.
(MSGM) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) a "Buy" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MSGM or TTWO?
Over the past 5 years, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) delivered a total return of +31. 6%, compared to -97. 9% for Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTWO returned +535. 7% versus MSGM's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MSGM or TTWO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Motorsport Games Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning MSGM is approximately 49% more volatile than TTWO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 192% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MSGM or TTWO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Motorsport Games Inc.
(MSGM) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 5. 3% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorsport Games Inc. grew EPS 252. 1% year-over-year, compared to -16. 2% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTWO leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MSGM or TTWO?
Motorsport Games Inc.
(MSGM) is the more profitable company, earning 61. 3% net margin versus -79. 5% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 61. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSGM leads at 14. 5% versus -77. 9% for TTWO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSGM leads at 81. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MSGM or TTWO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MSGM or TTWO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +535. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTWO: +535. 7%, MSGM: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MSGM and TTWO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MSGM is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.