Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MSGY vs ATXG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
MSGY vs ATXG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $6M | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 14.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | -49.4% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $325K |
Quick Verdict: MSGY vs ATXG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSGY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%
- -89.3% 10Y total return vs ATXG's -99.9%
- 13.0% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9%
ATXG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.44
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, current ratio 7.54x
- Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs ATXG's -202.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.44 vs MSGY's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -53.4% vs MSGY's -89.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.9% ROA vs ATXG's -19.4%, ROIC 77.1% vs -2.9% |
MSGY vs ATXG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MSGY vs ATXG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSGY leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSGY is the larger business by revenue, generating $23M annually — 6.3x ATXG's $4M. MSGY is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$947,630 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +14.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | -49.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | -34.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -136.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MSGY leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $25M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.24x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 0.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.69x | 4.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGY leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGY delivers a 46.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $-32 for ATXG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGY scores 7/9 vs ATXG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +46.6% | -31.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.9% | -19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +77.1% | -2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +54.9% | -3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $324,953 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSGY five years ago would be worth $1,074 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, ATXG leads with a -53.4% total return vs MSGY's -89.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGY at -52.5% vs ATXG's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -83.0% | -13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.3% | -53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -95.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.5% | -65.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ATXG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATXG is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGY's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATXG currently trades 17.5% from its 52-week high vs MSGY's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.20 | $27.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $0.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +17.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 215K | 157K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MSGY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ATXG leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
MSGY vs ATXG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSGY or ATXG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Masonglory Limited Ordinary Shares (MSGY) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MSGY or ATXG?
Over the past 5 years, Masonglory Limited Ordinary Shares (MSGY) delivered a total return of -89.
3%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSGY returned -89. 3% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MSGY or ATXG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Addentax Group Corp.
(ATXG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus Masonglory Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 77β — meaning MSGY is approximately 23% more volatile than ATXG relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MSGY or ATXG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Masonglory Limited Ordinary Shares (MSGY) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MSGY or ATXG?
Masonglory Limited Ordinary Shares (MSGY) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
5% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSGY leads at 6. 4% versus -43. 5% for ATXG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATXG leads at 15. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MSGY or ATXG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MSGY or ATXG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Addentax Group Corp.
(ATXG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Masonglory Limited Ordinary Shares (MSGY) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATXG: -99. 9%, MSGY: -89. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MSGY and ATXG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.