Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MSM vs SITE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MSM
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.75B
5Y Perf.+48.6%
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.36B
5Y Perf.+13.9%

MSM vs SITE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MSM logoMSM
SITE logoSITE
IndustryIndustrial - DistributionIndustrial - Distribution
Market Cap$5.75B$5.36B
Revenue (TTM)$3.81B$4.71B
Net Income (TTM)$205M$153M
Gross Margin40.7%34.9%
Operating Margin8.4%5.1%
Forward P/E23.7x27.8x
Total Debt$539M$980M
Cash & Equiv.$56M$191M

MSM vs SITELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MSM
SITE
StockMay 20May 26Return
MSC Industrial Dire… (MSM)100148.6+48.6%
SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE)100113.9+13.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MSM vs SITE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSM leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MSM
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
The Income Pick

MSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 3.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 38.6%, current ratio 1.68x
  • Beta 0.86, yield 3.3%, current ratio 1.68x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
The Growth Play

SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
  • 353.9% 10Y total return vs MSM's 86.2%
  • 3.6% revenue growth vs MSM's -1.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSITE logoSITE3.6% revenue growth vs MSM's -1.3%
ValueMSM logoMSMLower P/E (23.7x vs 27.8x)
Quality / MarginsMSM logoMSM5.4% margin vs SITE's 3.2%
Stability / SafetyMSM logoMSMBeta 0.86 vs SITE's 1.24, lower leverage
DividendsMSM logoMSM3.3% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MSM logoMSM+37.8% vs SITE's +0.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MSM logoMSM8.2% ROA vs SITE's 4.6%, ROIC 12.3% vs 7.3%

MSM vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MSMMSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$3.8B
SITESiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
FY 2025
Landscaping Products
76.9%$3.6B
Agronomic
23.1%$1.1B

MSM vs SITE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSMLAGGINGSITE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SITE and MSM operate at a comparable scale, with $4.7B and $3.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.4% (MSM) to 3.2% (SITE). On growth, MSM holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.8B$4.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$414M$382M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$205M$153M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$167M$246M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.7%+34.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.4%+5.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.4%+3.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.4%+5.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.0%+0.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.0%+1.6%
MSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MSM and SITE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 28.9x trailing earnings, MSM trades at a 20% valuation discount to SITE's 35.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSM's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SITE's 16.2x.

MetricMSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
Market CapShares × price$5.7B$5.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.2B$6.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS28.85x35.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.69x27.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate8.66x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.43x16.24x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.52x1.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.12x3.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.86x21.73x
Evenly matched — MSM and SITE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

MSM delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $9 for SITE. MSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SITE's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs MSM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.8%+9.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.2%+4.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.3%+7.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.5%+9.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–958
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.39x0.58x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$483M$789M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$56M$191M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$539M$980M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.56x6.79x
MSM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSM five years ago would be worth $12,864 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,256 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, MSM leads with a +37.8% total return vs SITE's +0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSM at 7.6% vs SITE's -7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.0%-3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+37.8%+0.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+24.7%-20.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.6%-37.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+86.2%+353.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+7.6%-7.5%
MSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITE's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSM currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs SITE's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.86x1.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$105.09$168.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$74.30$112.23
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.0%+71.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.438.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded594K686K
MSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates MSM as "Hold" and SITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.1% upside for SITE (target: $162) vs -5.1% for MSM (target: $98). MSM is the only dividend payer here at 3.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$97.75$162.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts2815
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises42
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.39
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+1.8%
MSM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MSM leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallMSC Industrial Direct Co., … (MSM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MSM vs SITE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MSM or SITE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM) offers the better valuation at 28. 9x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MSM or SITE?

On trailing P/E, MSC Industrial Direct Co.

, Inc. (MSM) is the cheapest at 28. 9x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MSM or SITE?

Over the past 5 years, MSC Industrial Direct Co.

, Inc. (MSM) delivered a total return of +28. 6%, compared to -37. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITE returned +353. 9% versus MSM's +86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MSM or SITE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MSC Industrial Direct Co.

, Inc. (MSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning SITE is approximately 45% more volatile than MSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 58% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MSM or SITE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -1. 3% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -22. 1% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MSM or SITE?

MSC Industrial Direct Co.

, Inc. (MSM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus 3. 2% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSM leads at 8. 3% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSM leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MSM or SITE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MSC Industrial Direct Co.

, Inc. (MSM) trades at 23. 7x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITE: 34. 1% to $162. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MSM or SITE?

In this comparison, MSM (3.

3% yield) pays a dividend. SITE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MSM or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MSC Industrial Direct Co.

, Inc. (MSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSM: +86. 2%, SITE: +353. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MSM and SITE?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MSM pays a dividend while SITE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MSM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SITE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MSM and SITE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MSM: 4.0% · SITE: 0.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(MSM: 5.4% · SITE: 3.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MSM: 28.9x · SITE: 35.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.