Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MSS vs CHEF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
MSS vs CHEF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $3M | $3.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114M | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $79M |
| Gross Margin | 20.2% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 36.8x |
| Total Debt | $51M | $1.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $775K | $121M |
MSS vs CHEF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maison Solutions In… (MSS) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| The Chefs' Warehous… (CHEF) | 100 | 422.2 | +322.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSS vs CHEF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 114.0%, EPS growth 134.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 43.6%
- 114.0% revenue growth vs CHEF's 9.4%
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 36.8x)
CHEF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.63
- 373.1% 10Y total return vs MSS's -98.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 2.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.0% revenue growth vs CHEF's 9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 36.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs MSS's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs MSS's 0.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.6% vs MSS's -86.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs MSS's -16.1%, ROIC 7.7% vs -1.4% |
MSS vs CHEF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MSS vs CHEF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHEF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHEF is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 37.4x MSS's $114M. CHEF is the more profitable business, keeping 1.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSS's -10.6%. On growth, CHEF holds the edge at +11.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114M | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $419M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$738,151 | $81M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +24.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.5% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | +60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MSS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.9x trailing earnings, MSS trades at a 96% valuation discount to CHEF's 47.8x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.85x | 47.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 6.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.56x | 37.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHEF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHEF delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-118 for MSS. CHEF carries lower financial leverage with a 1.95x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSS's 4.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSS scores 9/9 vs CHEF's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -118.2% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.4% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.40x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $775,360 | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.78x | 3.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHEF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHEF five years ago would be worth $24,950 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $136 for MSS. Over the past 12 months, CHEF leads with a +29.6% total return vs MSS's -86.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHEF at 32.1% vs MSS's -76.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.4% | +28.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.4% | +29.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +130.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +149.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +373.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.1% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CHEF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHEF is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSS's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHEF currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs MSS's 3.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.60 | $80.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $53.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.1% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 75.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 259K | 471K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
CHEF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MSS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MSS vs CHEF: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSS or CHEF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Maison Solutions Inc.
Class A Common Stock (MSS) is the stronger pick with 114. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 4% for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF). Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock (MSS) offers the better valuation at 1. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSS or CHEF?
On trailing P/E, Maison Solutions Inc.
Class A Common Stock (MSS) is the cheapest at 1. 9x versus The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. at 47. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSS or CHEF?
Over the past 5 years, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) delivered a total return of +149. 5%, compared to -98. 6% for Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock (MSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHEF returned +373. 1% versus MSS's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSS or CHEF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock's 0. 98β — meaning MSS is approximately 56% more volatile than CHEF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 195% versus 4% for Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MSS or CHEF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Maison Solutions Inc.
Class A Common Stock (MSS) is pulling ahead at 114. 0% versus 9. 4% for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock grew EPS 134. 7% year-over-year, compared to 27. 3% for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSS leads at 43. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSS or CHEF?
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 7% net margin versus 0. 9% for Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHEF leads at 3. 7% versus -1. 0% for MSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHEF leads at 24. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MSS or CHEF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MSS or CHEF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +373. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHEF: +373. 1%, MSS: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MSS and CHEF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHEF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.