Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MSS vs SFM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
MSS vs SFM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $3M | $7.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114M | $8.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $507M |
| Gross Margin | 20.2% | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 14.5x |
| Total Debt | $51M | $1.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $775K | $257M |
MSS vs SFM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maison Solutions In… (MSS) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 192.8 | +92.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSS vs SFM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 114.0%, EPS growth 134.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 43.6%
- 114.0% revenue growth vs SFM's 14.1%
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 14.5x)
SFM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.17
- 203.9% 10Y total return vs MSS's -98.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, current ratio 0.93x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.0% revenue growth vs SFM's 14.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 14.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs MSS's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs MSS's 0.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -51.7% vs MSS's -86.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs MSS's -16.1%, ROIC 17.8% vs -1.4% |
MSS vs SFM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MSS vs SFM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 78.2x MSS's $114M. SFM is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSS's -10.6%. On growth, SFM holds the edge at +4.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114M | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $996M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $507M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$738,151 | $361M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +37.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.5% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MSS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.9x trailing earnings, MSS trades at a 88% valuation discount to SFM's 15.3x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.85x | 15.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 5.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.56x | 16.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-118 for MSS. SFM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSS's 4.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSS scores 9/9 vs SFM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -118.2% | +36.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.1% | +12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.4% | +17.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +22.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.40x | 1.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $775,360 | $257M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.78x | 254.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SFM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $31,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $136 for MSS. Over the past 12 months, SFM leads with a -51.7% total return vs MSS's -86.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFM at 31.2% vs MSS's -76.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.4% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.4% | -51.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +125.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +213.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +203.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.1% | +31.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SFM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SFM is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSS's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFM currently trades 44.5% from its 52-week high vs MSS's 3.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.60 | $182.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $64.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.1% | +44.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 259K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $91.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.2% |
SFM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MSS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MSS vs SFM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSS or SFM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Maison Solutions Inc.
Class A Common Stock (MSS) is the stronger pick with 114. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 1% for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock (MSS) offers the better valuation at 1. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSS or SFM?
On trailing P/E, Maison Solutions Inc.
Class A Common Stock (MSS) is the cheapest at 1. 9x versus Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. at 15. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSS or SFM?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -98. 6% for Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock (MSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFM returned +203. 9% versus MSS's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSS or SFM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock's 0. 98β — meaning MSS is approximately 470% more volatile than SFM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 139% versus 4% for Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MSS or SFM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Maison Solutions Inc.
Class A Common Stock (MSS) is pulling ahead at 114. 0% versus 14. 1% for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock grew EPS 134. 7% year-over-year, compared to 41. 6% for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSS leads at 43. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSS or SFM?
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 0. 9% for Maison Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFM leads at 7. 8% versus -1. 0% for MSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MSS or SFM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MSS or SFM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), +203. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFM: +203. 9%, MSS: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MSS and SFM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.