Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MTA vs GROY vs WPM vs RGLD vs FNV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$671M
5Y Perf.-18.4%
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$633M
5Y Perf.-19.8%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$63.05B
5Y Perf.+263.4%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.59B
5Y Perf.+122.1%
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$44.75B
5Y Perf.+85.3%

MTA vs GROY vs WPM vs RGLD vs FNV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MTA logoMTA
GROY logoGROY
WPM logoWPM
RGLD logoRGLD
FNV logoFNV
IndustryOther Precious MetalsOther Precious MetalsGoldGoldGold
Market Cap$671M$633M$63.05B$16.59B$44.75B
Revenue (TTM)$4M$20M$2.33B$1.31B$1.83B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$-1M$1.48B$634M$1.12B
Gross Margin46.4%73.4%75.1%44.4%73.9%
Operating Margin-191.5%20.1%68.6%64.2%74.2%
Forward P/E112.6x60.7x25.2x20.3x26.5x
Total Debt$11M$101K$8M$966M$9M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$12M$1.15B$234M$433M

MTA vs GROY vs WPM vs RGLD vs FNVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MTA
GROY
WPM
RGLD
FNV
StockMar 21May 26Return
Metalla Royalty & S… (MTA)10081.6-18.4%
Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY)10080.2-19.8%
Wheaton Precious Me… (WPM)100363.4+263.4%
Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD)100222.1+122.1%
Franco-Nevada Corpo… (FNV)100185.3+85.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MTA vs GROY vs WPM vs RGLD vs FNV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Royal Gold, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. MTA and FNV also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

MTA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +144.1% vs RGLD's +34.8%
Best for: momentum
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GROY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
The Growth Play

WPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 83.3%, EPS growth 181.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.3%
  • 6.9% 10Y total return vs MTA's 25.8%
  • 83.3% revenue growth vs MTA's -18.7%
  • 63.6% margin vs MTA's -223.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
The Income Pick

RGLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 0.7%
  • Lower P/E (20.3x vs 25.2x)
  • 0.7% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs FNV's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
The Defensive Pick

FNV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 8.30x
  • PEG 0.99 vs RGLD's 2.62
  • Beta 0.66, yield 0.6%, current ratio 8.30x
  • Beta 0.66 vs MTA's 1.58, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWPM logoWPM83.3% revenue growth vs MTA's -18.7%
ValueRGLD logoRGLDLower P/E (20.3x vs 25.2x)
Quality / MarginsWPM logoWPM63.6% margin vs MTA's -223.0%
Stability / SafetyFNV logoFNVBeta 0.66 vs MTA's 1.58, lower leverage
DividendsRGLD logoRGLD0.7% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs FNV's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MTA logoMTA+144.1% vs RGLD's +34.8%
Efficiency (ROA)WPM logoWPM17.8% ROA vs MTA's -6.4%, ROIC 17.4% vs -4.0%

MTA vs GROY vs WPM vs RGLD vs FNV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MTAMetalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

GROYGold Royalty Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

WPMWheaton Precious Metals Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

RGLDRoyal Gold, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty Interest
100.0%$344M
FNVFranco-Nevada Corporation
FY 2024
Mining
34.1%$1.1B
Precious metals
26.1%$853M
Gold
21.7%$707M
Energy
5.9%$193M
Oil
3.9%$129M
Silver
3.6%$118M
Iron Ore
1.5%$51M
Other (4)
3.1%$101M

MTA vs GROY vs WPM vs RGLD vs FNV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWPMLAGGINGFNV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

WPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 592.8x MTA's $4M. WPM is the more profitable business, keeping 63.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTA's -2.2%. On growth, RGLD holds the edge at +144.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMTA logoMTAMetalla Royalty &…GROY logoGROYGold Royalty Corp.WPM logoWPMWheaton Precious …RGLD logoRGLDRoyal Gold, Inc.FNV logoFNVFranco-Nevada Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$20M$2.3B$1.3B$1.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M$8M$1.9B$1.1B$1.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M-$1M$1.5B$634M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M$7M$565M-$244M-$695M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.4%+73.4%+75.1%+44.4%+73.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-191.5%+20.1%+68.6%+64.2%+74.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.2%-5.7%+63.6%+48.5%+61.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-168.6%+33.9%+24.3%-18.7%-38.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+107.2%+128.7%+130.7%+144.8%+88.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.8%+173.0%+5.6%+91.9%+113.2%
WPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RGLD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 35.7x trailing earnings, RGLD trades at a 15% valuation discount to WPM's 42.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FNV offers better value at 1.49x vs RGLD's 4.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMTA logoMTAMetalla Royalty &…GROY logoGROYGold Royalty Corp.WPM logoWPMWheaton Precious …RGLD logoRGLDRoyal Gold, Inc.FNV logoFNVFranco-Nevada Cor…
Market CapShares × price$671M$633M$63.0B$16.6B$44.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$677M$621M$61.9B$17.3B$44.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-30.21x-152.97x42.20x35.73x39.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.112.58x60.67x25.23x20.35x26.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.87x4.59x1.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple140.15x32.06x20.58x27.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue278.06x40.56x26.77x16.10x24.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.74x0.90x7.28x2.31x5.88x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF633.17x109.92x23.54x
RGLD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

WPM delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for MTA. GROY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RGLD's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FNV scores 7/9 vs RGLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMTA logoMTAMetalla Royalty &…GROY logoGROYGold Royalty Corp.WPM logoWPMWheaton Precious …RGLD logoRGLDRoyal Gold, Inc.FNV logoFNVFranco-Nevada Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.7%-0.2%+18.5%+11.8%+16.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.4%-0.1%+17.8%+9.4%+15.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.0%+0.2%+17.4%+9.2%+16.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.2%+0.2%+19.8%+10.4%+18.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946647
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x0.00x0.00x0.13x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M-$12M-$1.1B$732M-$425M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$12M$1.2B$234M$433M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11M$101,000$8M$966M$9M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.64x0.81x294.59x52.45x450.58x
WPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WPM five years ago would be worth $32,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,340 for GROY. Over the past 12 months, MTA leads with a +144.1% total return vs RGLD's +34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WPM at 39.5% vs MTA's 12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMTA logoMTAMetalla Royalty &…GROY logoGROYGold Royalty Corp.WPM logoWPMWheaton Precious …RGLD logoRGLDRoyal Gold, Inc.FNV logoFNVFranco-Nevada Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.5%-11.5%+18.0%+8.5%+11.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+144.1%+132.9%+69.2%+34.8%+41.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+43.2%+59.5%+171.6%+72.9%+48.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.2%-26.6%+225.3%+107.5%+61.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2578.5%+2.5%+689.7%+349.0%+262.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.7%+16.8%+39.5%+20.0%+14.1%
WPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WPM and FNV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FNV is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTA's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WPM currently trades 83.8% from its 52-week high vs GROY's 66.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMTA logoMTAMetalla Royalty &…GROY logoGROYGold Royalty Corp.WPM logoWPMWheaton Precious …RGLD logoRGLDRoyal Gold, Inc.FNV logoFNVFranco-Nevada Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.58x0.80x0.78x0.73x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.25$5.46$165.76$306.25$285.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.75$1.45$75.42$150.75$152.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.4%+66.2%+83.8%+78.1%+81.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.050.746.439.538.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded484K2.4M2.3M1.0M794K
Evenly matched — WPM and FNV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RGLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MTA as "Buy", GROY as "Buy", WPM as "Buy", RGLD as "Buy", FNV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 66.2% upside for GROY (target: $6) vs 3.4% for MTA (target: $8). For income investors, RGLD offers the higher dividend yield at 0.71% vs WPM's 0.48%.

MetricMTA logoMTAMetalla Royalty &…GROY logoGROYGold Royalty Corp.WPM logoWPMWheaton Precious …RGLD logoRGLDRoyal Gold, Inc.FNV logoFNVFranco-Nevada Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.50$6.00$152.50$315.00$275.20
# AnalystsCovering analysts26202825
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+0.7%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0062411
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.66$1.70$1.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
RGLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RGLD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallWheaton Precious Metals Cor… (WPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MTA vs GROY vs WPM vs RGLD vs FNV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the stronger pick with 83. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) offers the better valuation at 35. 7x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV?

On trailing P/E, Royal Gold, Inc.

(RGLD) is the cheapest at 35. 7x versus Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. at 42. 2x. On forward P/E, Royal Gold, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Franco-Nevada Corporation wins at 0. 99x versus Royal Gold, Inc. 's 2. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV?

Over the past 5 years, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) delivered a total return of +225. 3%, compared to -26. 6% for Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTA returned +25. 8% versus GROY's +2. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

66β versus Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. 's 1. 58β — meaning MTA is approximately 140% more volatile than FNV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Royal Gold, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is pulling ahead at 83. 3% versus -18. 7% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. grew EPS 181. 2% year-over-year, compared to -18. 0% for Gold Royalty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GROY leads at 58. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV?

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 6% net margin versus -452. 8% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps 63. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FNV leads at 71. 0% versus -255. 3% for MTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GROY leads at 76. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Royal Gold, Inc. 's 2. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 112. 6x for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — 92. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GROY: 66. 2% to $6. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV?

In this comparison, RGLD (0.

7% yield), FNV (0. 6% yield), WPM (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MTA, GROY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MTA or GROY or WPM or RGLD or FNV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

66), 0. 6% yield, +262. 2% 10Y return). Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FNV: +262. 2%, MTA: +25. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MTA and GROY and WPM and RGLD and FNV?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GROY is a small-cap high-growth stock; WPM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RGLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FNV is a mid-cap high-growth stock. RGLD, FNV pay a dividend while MTA, GROY, WPM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MTA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 53%
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GROY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 64%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WPM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 65%
  • Net Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RGLD

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Net Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FNV

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 44%
  • Net Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MTA and GROY and WPM and RGLD and FNV on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MTA: 107.2% · GROY: 128.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.