Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MTH vs SHW vs MAS vs IBP vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Construction
Residential Construction
Construction
MTH vs SHW vs MAS vs IBP vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Chemicals - Specialty | Construction | Residential Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.30B | $78.98B | $14.51B | $5.84B | $8.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.62B | $23.94B | $7.68B | $2.95B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $386M | $2.60B | $837M | $255M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 18.6% | 49.1% | 35.4% | 33.9% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 16.1% | 16.8% | 12.7% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 27.3x | 16.9x | 19.5x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.89B | $14.53B | $3.44B | $1.05B | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $775M | $207M | $647M | $322M | $182M |
MTH vs SHW vs MAS vs IBP vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meritage Homes Corp… (MTH) | 100 | 185.4 | +85.4% |
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 337.3 | +237.3% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 381.9 | +281.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTH vs SHW vs MAS vs IBP vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MTH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 12.12x
- Beta 1.17, yield 2.7%, current ratio 12.12x
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 16.9x)
SHW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.
- 2.1% revenue growth vs MTH's -8.4%
- Beta 0.79 vs BLDR's 1.65
MAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 10.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
- 15.9% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 35.4% vs 6.4%
IBP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.1%
- PEG 0.80 vs MTH's 4.17
- +34.0% vs BLDR's -25.0%
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.1% revenue growth vs MTH's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs BLDR's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs BLDR's -25.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 35.4% vs 6.4% |
MTH vs SHW vs MAS vs IBP vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MTH vs SHW vs MAS vs IBP vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAS leads in 2 of 6 categories
MTH leads 1 • IBP leads 1 • SHW leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHW is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.9B annually — 8.1x IBP's $2.9B. MAS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, SHW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.6B | $23.9B | $7.7B | $2.9B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $479M | $4.5B | $1.4B | $656M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $386M | $2.6B | $837M | $255M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $238M | $2.9B | $943M | $63M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +49.1% | +35.4% | +33.9% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +16.1% | +16.8% | +12.7% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +10.9% | +10.9% | +8.6% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +12.1% | +12.3% | +2.1% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.7% | +6.8% | +6.5% | -3.5% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.5% | +7.5% | +20.7% | -21.3% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MTH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, MTH trades at a 68% valuation discount to SHW's 31.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs SHW's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $79.0B | $14.5B | $5.8B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.4B | $93.3B | $17.3B | $6.6B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.07x | 31.18x | 18.63x | 22.33x | 20.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.82x | 27.27x | 16.85x | 19.50x | 14.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.27x | 4.51x | 3.76x | 0.92x | 2.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.63x | 21.24x | 12.18x | 13.41x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 3.35x | 1.92x | 1.97x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 17.33x | 201.40x | 8.26x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.50x | 29.76x | 16.76x | 19.41x | 10.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. MTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs MTH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +58.2% | +8.0% | +37.5% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +10.0% | +15.9% | +12.2% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +16.5% | +35.4% | +20.7% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +21.3% | +35.9% | +22.6% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 3.16x | 45.81x | 1.48x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $14.3B | $2.8B | $731M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $775M | $207M | $647M | $322M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $14.5B | $3.4B | $1.1B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 815.85x | 7.83x | 12.60x | 9.47x | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $18,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,609 for MAS. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +34.0% total return vs BLDR's -25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs BLDR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.0% | -2.1% | +12.1% | -18.1% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.8% | -8.0% | +21.1% | +34.0% | -25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.6% | +42.4% | +40.1% | +98.3% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.4% | +16.1% | +16.1% | +80.6% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +306.9% | +250.0% | +152.1% | +650.1% | +614.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.5% | +12.5% | +11.9% | +25.6% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHW and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHW is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 0.79x | 1.28x | 1.19x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $84.74 | $379.65 | $79.19 | $349.00 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.03 | $301.58 | $58.16 | $150.83 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.0% | +84.3% | +90.8% | +62.1% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 47.6 | 59.6 | 55.0 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 933K | 1.6M | 2.7M | 344K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MTH and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MTH as "Buy", SHW as "Buy", MAS as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 14.5% for MAS (target: $82). For income investors, MTH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.65% vs SHW's 0.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.25 | $389.43 | $82.36 | $293.00 | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 38 | 38 | 27 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.0% | +1.7% | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 37 | 12 | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.71 | $3.17 | $1.24 | $3.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.9% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +3.0% | +4.7% |
MAS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MTH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MTH vs SHW vs MAS vs IBP vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger pick with 2.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH). Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) is the cheapest at 10.
1x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, Meritage Homes Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus Meritage Homes Corporation's 4. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +80. 6%, compared to +16. 1% for Masco Corporation (MAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus MAS's +152. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 109% more volatile than SHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is pulling ahead at 2.
1% versus -8. 4% for Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Installed Building Products, Inc. grew EPS 6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR?
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
9% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus Meritage Homes Corporation's 4. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 3x for The Sherwin-Williams Company — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR?
In this comparison, MTH (2.
7% yield), MAS (1. 7% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield), SHW (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MTH or SHW or MAS or IBP or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 1. 0% yield, +250. 0% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHW: +250. 0%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MTH and SHW and MAS and IBP and BLDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (MTH (Consumer Cyclical) and SHW (Basic Materials) and MAS (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MTH, SHW, MAS, IBP pay a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.